Boytwnmom
Verified Attorney
- Joined
- Jul 26, 2008
- Messages
- 1,652
- Reaction score
- 297
and was erroneous in his conclusions based on it which is part of why it is illegal for LE to use racial profiling. GZ may have been profiling "in good faith" in his mind which "knew" that there were lots of burglaries all done by young black guys and hey, look, a black guy and he's "suspicious" because ummm, he's walking and looking around, wait, he's on drugs, there's something wrong with him, he's up to no good etc. Those were all things he said and conclusions that were drawn based upon, IMO, very little actual evidence beyond Trayvon was young and black and male.
The problem with profiling is that it offers no, ZERO information about the likelihood of any particular individual committing a crime or doing something illegal. Behavior is a much better indicator than race. So, was it Trayvon's behavior or race that caused him to be suspicious. IMO, it was his race and I believe if a white boy had been doing the same thing as Trayvon GZ would not have concluded he was a criminal and thus set in motion the tragic events of that evening. I would feel differently if Trayvon had engaged in any behavior noted, at that time (and not invented now), as being actually suspicious, i.e., looking in windows, trying doors, checking out garage door opener panels, hiding in bushes while going from house to house. People can disagree but I think Trayvon's race was an essential aspect of GZ's conclusion that Trayvon was a criminal that needed to be apprehended and that if he didn't do something this a%$hole would get away just like all the others.
The problem with profiling is that it offers no, ZERO information about the likelihood of any particular individual committing a crime or doing something illegal. Behavior is a much better indicator than race. So, was it Trayvon's behavior or race that caused him to be suspicious. IMO, it was his race and I believe if a white boy had been doing the same thing as Trayvon GZ would not have concluded he was a criminal and thus set in motion the tragic events of that evening. I would feel differently if Trayvon had engaged in any behavior noted, at that time (and not invented now), as being actually suspicious, i.e., looking in windows, trying doors, checking out garage door opener panels, hiding in bushes while going from house to house. People can disagree but I think Trayvon's race was an essential aspect of GZ's conclusion that Trayvon was a criminal that needed to be apprehended and that if he didn't do something this a%$hole would get away just like all the others.
I have a question.
I would love an answer.
Is there anything that shows GZ is a racist?
Besides the word that NOBODY understands. Could have been racist but its not clear.
Is there ANYTHING else?
Because post after post I read
"this racist" and "wanted to shoot a black kid" and "black kid in a hoodie".
Is there anything that shows GZ is a racist?
The race issue is out of hand. With NO evidence GZ is even racist.