I just got time to read this one today. I have some serious doubts as to the shooting/kidnapping,
though it is certainly possible.
Again, just based on what I have read so far from msm, I might have missed a key point or article.
(1)
The only report of the "shooting" was from the missing boy.
(2)
The only report of the kidnappers/shooters description was from the missing boy.
(3)
No eye witnesses.
(4)
The truck was NOT "all shot up." The only statement was the truck was sitting later with "evidence markers around it". If that car had been full of bullet holes, forensic ballistic specialists would have been actively working it unless the county was so small they had to call in a team for that (possible). They do more than take photographs and put out evidence markers. If there are bullet holes in the vehicle they'll use measurements as well as sometimes 3D laser scans of the vehicle and surrounding area, to help determine whether the vehicle or shooter was moving, if more than one firearm was used, AND, if shot from other than a vehicle, the shooters position or height.
(5)
No mention of blood or any definitive evidence of injury.
Certainly, this could simply be poor or incomplete reporting (not that THAT ever happens
) but the scenario
as reported, just raises my "red flags" as to the possibility of a hoax, unless the famiy has had threatening events going on that have not been disclosed to the public.