minor4th
Verified Attorney
- Joined
- Jan 14, 2013
- Messages
- 8,529
- Reaction score
- 5,223
It is unusual to feel so conflicted over a case. typically by now we all have a distinct opinion on what we feel the verdict should be.
For this case, we have to focus on the law.
I think we all can agree that she is clearly mentally ill. What the jury needs to determine is if she knew that what she was doing was wrong, even though she is mentally ill.
I was getting hung up on the possibility of her not knowing the wrongness of her actions because she was mentally ill.
The great points brought up by the last two witnesses have proven to me that she did indeed know that what she was doing was wrong. They provided insight as to the fact that her actions before and after the murders were very telling into her state of mind and her knowing that the murders were wrong.
jmho
I need to have a closer look at Florida's insanity statute. You're right - it will come down to the application of Florida's law.
One of my first posts about this trial said essentially that I believed she had very distorted thinking but it didn't rise to the level of legal insanity.