This whole situation is making some names pop into my head: Billie J. Dunn; Casey Anthony; Toby Keith. SMH
Wow. That's pretty repugnant. Especially considering the "step father" got a mention.
And...THREE sisters?
question for you:
Normally, wouldn't a lawyer approach law concerning anything like this if it's that big of a deal?
Isn't there a rule of thumb that cases are not to be discussed through interviews and the like (twitter, social media) or is it more common sense and tact?
I am not familiar with law or at least in the sense of practicing it; but I was under the assumption that atty's do not discuss cases that are currently pending or ones they are retained for. I know they can be spokesman but they steer clear of any personal type talks or opinions. I look at this like a Dr or nurse going public with a patient. There's just some things you don't do.
This whole situation is making some names pop into my head: Billie J. Dunn; Casey Anthony; Toby Keith. SMH
It is my personal understanding and professional understanding (not a lawyer but a LE support profession) that issues are dealt with through proper channels such as the courts by filing motions etc. Not social media. I work in a job where we would get fired for posting anything work related on social media or blogs etc.
I agree for the most part, however I think it's worth considering that "if her mother had protected her" maybe the scenario could have gotten worse. e.g. the offender becoming angry he wasn't getting what he wanted so attacks the mother and/or the children
Thank you for answering my questions. your response is what I thought to be the norm too.
Even the most fame monger atty's don't behave in this manner. Allred, Kuby etc. i wanted to call my atty and ask about this but I kinda didn't want to spend the 200.00 for a question lol
Thank you for answering my questions. your response is what I thought to be the norm too.
Even the most fame monger atty's don't behave in this manner. Allred, Kuby etc. i wanted to call my atty and ask about this but I kinda didn't want to spend the 200.00 for a question lol
They do when they see the system fail over and over again some has too speak out.I usually have not seen a Court evaluator speak out and I follow many cases. Everyone involved most likely feels some responsibility or maybe just sick to death of seeing children die.
What should his lawyer tell him to do ?Not attend the funeral?Stay in Ca.? Your child what would you do?
Interesting how RP refused to tell Mr. Jarreau of Cherish's birth and he had to find out from the state when she claimed benefits for her. So she denied him the right to even know he had a child.
Then she fights him in court to try and keep him from his child, when it is clear the child would be better off with her dad.
Now she wants to keep Mr Jarreau away from the funeral for Cherish and is allegedly threatening to cause him problems if her shows up. Even in DEATH - she tries to deny him the chance to be with his child, hos LAST chance to see her before she is buried.
But meanwhile, she had no problems Cherish being with a strange man ( a SEX OFFENDER!!!), had no problem with him going with Cherish to the dressing room, had no problem with Cherish going to Mc D with this sex predator.
Umm, yeah there is something seriously wrong with this unusual "mom". Deny the father access but allow a convicted sex offender free access.
Yeah, I'm going to go sit on my hands now cuz I love WS and the mods an don;t want to cause any problems with expressing my real uncensored thoughts on this.
I agree for the most part, however I think it's worth considering that "if her mother had protected her" maybe the scenario could have gotten worse. e.g. the offender becoming angry he wasn't getting what he wanted so attacks the mother and/or the children
They do when they see the system fail over and over again some has too speak out.I usually have not seen a Court evaluator speak out and I follow many cases. Everyone involved most likely feels some responsibility or maybe just sick to death of seeing children die.
What should his lawyer tell him to do ?Not attend the funeral?Stay in Ca.? Your child what would you do?
There are a lot of lawyers on Twitter etc. And example being Mark Eiglarsh. I have never seen him so anything of the sort.
A lot of companies and agencies have social media policies for employees now.
I believe that this lawyer was Mr. Jarreau's Florida counsel in the custody battle for Cherish. I have a funny feeling that Mr. Jarreau (and others) have been told not to speak about the specifics of the case to the media because LE has a few tricks left up their sleeve, so I think the lawyer may be speaking on Billy's behalf so he has some sort of voice in all this.
Family lawyers take to social media to speak out? I doubt it.
His lawyer should tell him to do what is best for his daughter. His lawyer should have dealt with the funeral home and made arrangements and had a letter couriered to the mother stating his client's position. Going on Facebook did nothing but make people more angry than they already are. What's the point? Does it help Cherish?
As for why the mother has not been charged...it is only Wednesday. CPS has to wait for the police to finish their investigation. Doesn't mean that there is nothing being looking into...we just don't know about it.