GUILTY FL - Cherish Perrywinkle, 8, Jacksonville, 21 June 2013 #3

Status
Not open for further replies.
  • #421
“The kids were always in danger over there,”

We have to, number one, make sure the children are going to be safe, they’re going to be cared for, they’re going to be protected,” he said. “If you have a case where the children may be familiar with a certain person, then that needs to be taken into consideration, too

Read more at Jacksonville.com: http://jacksonville.com/news/metro/...r-cherishs-sisters-want-custody#ixzz2YuzaZ6Du

Seems to me, the spokesman for DCF may want to review what he stated. Familiar and safe do not go together in this case. The people most familiar to them also kept them in danger, imo.

DCF is full of BS IMO! Maybe they should have thought what was truley in Cherishs best interest and we would never of read about and she would not have been raped and murdered if the childrens best interest would have been the real concern in the first place.The system knew RA and AP home was dangerous for Cherish yet left her in that home, the judge and system also knew if that home was dangerous for Cherish then it was also a bad home of the now 2 surviving sisters!JMO But I have been fighting DCF in NJ for over 3 years now for my own grandson and he and his sister is still in a home they they have labeled as high abuse danger yet 3 1/2 yrs later case still open and kids still suffering. I just wanted to add I have been fighting the system for years on behalf of children since before my own grandsons situation, Once you are within the system you see it for what it really is and you realize why children are dying everyday even with fathers and family fighting to save them!Exposing them is very difficult because unless your into the system you have no idea it is one big F-D up system JMO!






up IMO.
 
  • #422
cherish7.PNG.jpg


cherish12.PNG


cherish4.PNG


cherishdad1.PNG


cherish10.PNG


I'm not a bettin' woman, but I'd bet dollars to donuts that the man in these photos, whose presence put those smiles on his daughter's face: a) loved his daughter with all his heart and soul; b) is feeling the most excruciating pain he will ever feel in his entire life; and c) would have laid down his own life to save his daughter.

I agree and know how right your words are! When will the courts realize that just because a woman gave birth means she is the right one to raise the children,Some times the father is the only good choice but being male they truly do not stand a chance! Heartbreaking that another child died because of the Family court system really does not do what is the best interest of the children. We see the results here everyday and some of us live with trying to prevent the children we love from being a headline!
 
  • #423
I really feel like nobody is reading what i write. I have known plenty of biodads and moms when faced with support payment, they offer or ask the step parent to adopt. I am not saying that what AP says is true, what i am saying is 1. rather than take cherish from the only parent she knew for almost 4 years, why not work together for the good of cherish? 2. And I do not understand why everything Bio dad says is taken at face value, and nothing AP says is. What i am saying IMO, this poor little girl had she lived was in for a terrible life. Allegations of all kinds of things from both sides, 3. extended family who only cares after tragedy strikes. What i am saying is I really think everybody needs to reach out to your families and say hey is everything OK? 4. Reach out to the moms and dads you know and say hey need a sitter? Don't wait for something horrible to happen. Reach out to your neighbor and say hi my name is lets work out baby sitting coops. Be safe about it, of course, but hold out a hand.

5. This is how the sex offenders get a leg in. Desperate people trying to do too much. And they make mistakes, they leave a preteen or teen at home alone for an hour or two, they get sloppy or they are tired and don't think clearly. I am sorry there is so much anger at RP. None of us on here can know if she can be a good parent. And anytime I try to put some hope out there for either RP or AP, I am feeling very attacked.


BBM:

1. The only parents she knew? All evidence shows Cherish has always known her father, and has seen him/spent time with him. And if Rayne and AP were seriously concerned for the good of Cherish, they should have listened to their child's advocate and agreed to give BJ primary custody. But then no child support check, so....

2. Because most of bio dad's statements in MSM have been supported by an attorney and court documents vetted by the media. Rayne and Aahon's statements contradict themselves and each other with each new telling. Their statements to the media contradict the police report! RP and AP have proven time and again that they are incapable of telling the same story twice.

3. I hope this is not an allusion that the sibling in Australia is somehow to blame for anything as she was abandoned by Rayne herself, and justifiably has not spoken to her mother in 10 years. The extended family in Australia would have no reason to know what was going on and would have little capability in legally doing anything....until now.

4. Is the implication here that if some neighbor had just been kind and offered to babysit the kids that night, Rayne wouldn't have sent her daughter off with a creeper to a fitting room, then for a burger? Aharon was home that evening, talking to a neighbor about how long Rayne was gone. An able bodied adult and father of two of the three girls, capable of caring for his 'own', who should have been in bed, especially Cherish who had a very early flight. But those darn neighbors didn't reach out and help them? So blame there? The world at large is responsible for RP's tiredness and desperation?

5. Get a leg in? She HANDED. HER DAUGHTER. TO HIM. A STRANGE MAN. Mutiple times. She didn't have to go shopping. She didn't have to drag three children with her, Aahon was home. Her desire for a gift card--free money--caused criminal blindness to her children's safety. Period. Too tired to go shopping? Don't go shopping. They bought a sparkly barrette that night. She wasn't hauling the family to the store for diapers and baby formula.

I've never heard of someone being so tired and exhausted, they temporarily forgot they should never let a stranger take their child anywhere, least of all a changing room. The woman is 45 years old. And why is she so tired and exhausted, more so than everyone else in this country? Her oldest was in school during the day, and was leaving for the summer the next day. That leaves two kids, and neither were babes in diapers, or even toddlers. RP doesn't appear to work, but I see no reason why she cannot. If you are desperate for money: work.

If it's mental illness, or drugs, well, if the mental illness or drugs makes her so out of it and tired and so sloppy....again, she should not be legally responsible for children.

If anything makes you so tired and sloppy that you do to your children what 5year olds are taught in kindergarten not to do, (talk to stranger/get in car with stranger/change clothes near/in front of stranger) you should not be raising children.

Comparing letting your little girl go off with alone with a strange man who 'gave you a creepy feeling', to leaving a preteen home for a few hours is staggering to me. They are not even close to the same. One is criminal child endangerment/neglect/abuse, and one is a common every day judgment call that good parent make depending on the maturity of a child.

Arguably, though those 3 girls were not teens or preteens, they WOULD have been safer if she'd left them home alone. If they'd been at home, Rayne wouldn't have been able to hand Cherish to a strange man in exchange for an invisible Walmart card.

Again, IMO:

RP's desire for a gift card--free money--caused criminal blindness/negligence/endangerment to her children's safety.

BJ: Fighting for custody, to care for his daughter, didn't cause this. Neither did bickering with Rayne and AP. Not even a little.

Australia family: how can they be blamed for not stepping in from an ocean away. Why would they know what was going on? Rayne abandoned her grown daughter years ago and moved to another continent.

I'm sorry you're feeling attacked. No one intends to attack a poster here. We do tend to attack a post, which happens on a lot of threads and is a common part of the discussion/debate. I believe it is one thing to put out your own personal hope for RP And AP to improve their lives. Some/many may not agree, but it's your prerogative, your opinion, and a kind thing to do if you feel compelled to do so. But when a post treads into the area to spreading the blame of a child's murder or misery on a non-custodial bio father that lived across the country, on friends/family/neighbors who may or may not have offered to 'help' this 'poor, exhausted mom' .... well, it gets people's hackles up.

This particular murder of this particular child on this exact night was EASILY avoidable. This is not one of those "that could have happened to any mom" situations. It's just not.

Cherish died, IMO, because 5 things happened.

1)Donald Smith was let out of prison.

2)A judge went against the recommendation of a child advocate and placed Cherish in the custody of an unsafe parent.

3) Rayne chose to drag three kids shopping with her for non-necessities, instead of leaving them home with their dad/stepdad figure, or having him accompany her to help with the kids.

4)Rayne went against every natural parental instinct 99.9% of the population and willfully chose to endanger her 3 children in a minimum of three different instances for the promise of a Walmart gift card.

5)Donald Smith is a sick monster and did what sick monsters do.
 
  • #424
BBM:

1. The only parents she knew? All evidence shows Cherish has always known her father, and has seen him/spent time with him. And if Rayne and AP were seriously concerned for the good of Cherish, they should have listened to their child's advocate and agreed to give BJ primary custody. But then no child support check, so....

2. Because most of bio dad's statements in MSM have been supported by an attorney and court documents vetted by the media. Rayne and Aahon's statements contradict themselves and each other with each new telling. Their statements to the media contradict the police report! RP and AP have proven time and again that they are incapable of telling the same story twice.

3. I hope this is not an allusion that the sibling in Australia is somehow to blame for anything as she was abandoned by Rayne herself, and justifiably has not spoken to her mother in 10 years. The extended family in Australia would have no reason to know what was going on and would have little capability in legally doing anything....until now.

4. Is the implication here that if some neighbor had just been kind and offered to babysit the kids that night, Rayne wouldn't have sent her daughter off with a creeper to a fitting room, then for a burger? Aharon was home that evening, talking to a neighbor about how long Rayne was gone. An able bodied adult and father of two of the three girls, capable of caring for his 'own', who should have been in bed, especially Cherish who had a very early flight. But those darn neighbors didn't reach out and help them? So blame there? And, I'm guessing since DFACS didn't take the kids before this, even if they didn't have grounds until now, they're to blame too? The world at large is responsible for RP's tiredness and desperation?

5. Get a leg in? She HANDED. HER DAUGHTER. TO HIM. A STRANGE MAN. Mutiple times. She didn't have to go shopping. She didn't have to drag three children with her, Aahon was home. Her desire for a gift card--free money--caused criminal blindness to her children's safety. Period. Too tired to go shopping? Don't go shopping. They bought a sparkly barrette that night. She wasn't hauling the family to the store for diapers and baby formula.

I've never heard of someone being so tired and exhausted, they temporarily forgot they should never let a stranger take their child anywhere, least of all a changing room. The woman is 45 years old. And why is she so tired and exhausted, more so than everyone else in this country? Her oldest was in school during the day, and was leaving for the summer the next day. That leaves two kids, and neither were babes in diapers, or even toddlers. RP doesn't appear to work, but I see no reason why she cannot. If you are desperate for money: work.

If it's mental illness, or drugs, well, if the mental illness or drugs makes her so out of it and tired and so sloppy....again, she should not be legally responsible for children.

If anything makes you so tired and sloppy that you do to your children what 5year olds are taught in kindergarten not to do, (talk to stranger/get in car with stranger/change clothes near/in front of stranger) you should not be raising children.

Comparing letting your little girl go off with alone with a strange man who 'gave you a creepy feeling', to leaving a preteen home for a few hours is staggering to me. They are not even close to the same. One is criminal child endangerment/neglect/abuse, and one is a common every day judgment call that good parent make depending on the maturity of a child.

Arguably, though those 3 girls were not teens or preteens, they WOULD have been safer if she'd left them home alone. If they'd been at home, Rayne wouldn't have been able to hand Cherish to a strange man in exchange for an invisible Walmart card.

Again, IMO:

RP's desire for a gift card--free money--caused criminal blindness/negligence/endangerment to her children's safety.

BJ: Fighting for custody, to care for his daughter, didn't cause this. Neither did bickering with Rayne and AP. Not even a little.

Australia family: how can they be blamed for not stepping in from an ocean away. Why would they know what was going on? Rayne abandoned her grown daughter years ago and moved to another continent.

I'm sorry you're feeling attacked. No one intends to attack a poster here. We do tend to attack a post, which happens on a lot of threads and is a common part of the discussion/debate. I believe it is one thing to put out your own personal hope for RP And AP to improve their lives. Some/many may not agree, but it's your prerogative, your opinion, and a kind thing to do if you feel compelled to do so. But when a post treads into the area to spreading the blame of a child's murder or misery on a non-custodial bio father that lived across the country, on friends/family/neighbors who may or may not have offered to 'help' this 'poor, exhausted mom' .... well, it gets people's hackles up.

This particular murder of this particular child on this exact night was EASILY avoidable. This is not one of those "that could have happened to any mom" situations. It's just not.

Cherish died, IMO, because 5 things happened.

1)Donald Smith was let out of prison.

2)A judge went against the recommendation of a child advocate and placed Cherish in the custody of an unsafe parent.

3) Rayne chose to drag three kids shopping with her for non-necessities, instead of leaving them home with their dad/stepdad figure, or having him accompany her to help with the kids.

4)Rayne went against every natural parental instinct 99.9% of the population and willfully chose to endanger her 3 children in a minimum of three different instances for the promise of a Walmart gift card.

5)Donald Smith is a sick monster and did what sick monsters do.
Now it's my turn to do this:

:great::thewave::thewave::thewave::great:
 
  • #425
:goodpost: Magdalyn .. said so exactly perfectly
 
  • #426
Magdalyn, that was an amazing post! I'm not quoting it for the sake of space but you killed it and did it so kindly and intelligently! The blame game that is going on here regarding BJ is distressing and inexplicable. I find it really strange to see his motive and honesty being questioned while extreme attempts are being made to justify Rayne's actions and deflect blame off her. It was NOT BJ's job to "work with" RP's baby daddy and it was NOT the neighbors', mailman's or Flying Spahetti Monster's job to baby sit RP's kids. It WAS Rayne's job to tell the creepy, old man "no thanks" and to stay the hell away from her daughters and the dressing room! DS did not even have to abduct or even hide the fact that the was walking off with Cherish because RP handed her over for a freaking fast food cheeseburger!!
 
  • #427
Thank you Madalyn and My_Tee_Mouse for putting my thoughts and feelings into words that I found hard to express in a post! We have some amazing WS members here for Cherish.

I apologize Salem. I was upset about the attacks on Cherish's father. I'll choose my words wisely next time. Sorry to make your job more difficult.
 
  • #428
  • #429
  • #430
Not guilty huh?

The guy must have rotten luck. What are the odds that an eight year old leaves Walmart with a RSO and then some other dude does it.

:banghead:

.....and just happens to be found soaking wet and dirty at the same time the victim's body is found near water.
 
  • #431
  • #432
Not guilty huh?

The guy must have rotten luck. What are the odds that an eight year old leaves Walmart with a RSO and then some other dude does it.

:banghead:

I'd say the odds are about the same as RP learning anything from this and becoming a decent parent. I have bronchitis and can't breathe anyway but the rest of you probably shouldn't hold your breath.
 
  • #433
How in the heck an a registered sex offender be seen on camera leaving Walmart with Cherish and then plead NOT GUILTY?

What's his story? He took her to McDonalds down the street to get the burgers, but she ran away and he couldn't go back to Walmart to tell Rayne that he lost her so he just went home? Then, some random perp ran into her and killed her? Puh-lease.

Just admit you're a monster!
 
  • #434
I believe it was reported his lawyer will go for insanity defense.
 
  • #435
As for the Insanity- he did say he had a wife-- whole story about the Virgin Islands, that he had a job, that he had the infamous gift card.

I don't think a bit of that is insanity. Just lying manipulation.

I'm sure that when the DNA comes back from Cherish- LE will find plenty to cement their case.
 
  • #436
I don't believe for a second that he is insane. But when he is on video taking the child from Walmart, what else is there to defend him? I guess he can go for he took the child from Walmart, but somebody else killed her defense? Not very believable if you ask me.
 
  • #437
Of course he wants to plead insanity. He's a coward who preys on young, vulnerable children. He would rather be locked up in a mental institute instead of facing fellow inmates. He might have survived in prison with his past crimes, he won't survive this time. DS is the worst of the worst. JMO
 
  • #438
im on my phone, but if anyone cares to dig, i believe he attempted an insanity defense in a past case and it was denied. does anybody know, if it's been denied once, does he even have the option of trying that again? can one just develop insanity? (btw, he's clearly sane and capable of manipulating and plotting... IMO!)
 
  • #439
Authorities rejected a plea of insanity in one of his early criminal cases after a psychiatric exam.

Smith spent 1999 to 2002 under involuntary civil commitment after meeting the criteria of a violent sexual predator as part of the state's Jimmy Ryce Act.

http://www.wtsp.com/news/article/323031/19/Troubled-history-for-man-charged-in-Florida-slaying



"Involuntary civil commitment is the admission of individuals against their will into a mental health unit. Generally speaking, there are three reasons why an individual would be subject to involuntary civil commitment under modern statutes: mental illness, developmental disability, and substance addiction."

http://www.law.cornell.edu/wex/involuntary_civil_commitment
 
  • #440
I have really been wondering about the trip that Cherish was going on to visit her Daddy and these things crossed my mind. It just seems odd that RP had Cherish out so late since she was supposed to be flying the next morning. It doesn't seem like the mom was going to send Cherish, seeing as she had no way to get her to the airport.

*Since RP had no money, I was wondering just how she expected Cherish to get to the airport.

*I understand that BJ was supposed to pay for the ticket but was he the one who booked and paid for the ticket OR had he sent the money to RP for her to book the ticket and pay for it? Basically, I am wondering that IF it was RP who was supposed to get the ticket, was there even a ticket purchased? Or had she and AP done something else with the money, if BJ had sent the money to them for the ticket?

*Did Cherish already have her things packed that she was going to bring with her? Surely she had a little suitcase or backpack already packed and ready to go but we never heard anything about that.

Honestly it just doesn't seem like RP had any intentions of putting her on that plane.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Members online

Online statistics

Members online
133
Guests online
3,239
Total visitors
3,372

Forum statistics

Threads
632,550
Messages
18,628,331
Members
243,196
Latest member
CaseyClosed
Back
Top