STING SNARES TWO DISNEY WORLD AND DISNEY RESORT EMPLOYEES AMONG 17 MEN ARRESTED sting snares two Disney World and Disney Resort employees among 17 men arrested
Resources and Information)) are not protected under First Amendment rights, and are illegal contraband under federal law. Section 2256 of Title 18, United States Code, defines child as any visual depiction of sexually explicit conduct involving a minor (someone under 18 years of age). Visual depictions include photographs, videos, digital or computer generated images indistinguishable from an actual minor, and images created, adapted, or modified, but appear to depict an identifiable, actual minor. Undeveloped film, undeveloped videotape, and electronically stored data that can be converted into a visual image of child are also deemed illegal visual depictions under federal law. if it is sufficiently sexually suggestive. Additionally, the age of consent for sexual activity in a given state is irrelevant; any depiction of a minor under 18 years of age engaging in sexually explicit conduct is illegal. using or affecting any means or facility of interstate or foreign commerce (See 18 U.S.C. § 2251; 18 U.S.C. § 2252; 18 U.S.C. § 2252A). Specifically, Section 2251 makes it illegal to persuade, induce, entice, or coerce a minor to engage in sexually explicit conduct for purposes of producing visual depictions of that conduct. Any individual who attempts or conspires to commit a child offense is also subject to prosecution under federal law. offense occurred in interstate or foreign commerce. This includes, for example, using the U.S. Mails or common carriers to transport child across state or international borders. Additionally, federal jurisdiction almost always applies when the Internet is used to commit a child violation. Even if the child image itself did not travel across state or international borders, federal law may be implicated if the materials, such as the computer used to download the image or the CD-ROM used to store the image, originated or previously traveled in interstate or foreign commerce.. with intent to import or transmit the visual depiction into the United States. law is a serious crime, and convicted offenders face severe statutory penalties. For example, a first time offender convicted of producing child under 18 U.S.C. § 2251, face fines and a statutory minimum of 15 years to 30 years maximum in prison. A first time offender convicted of transporting child in interstate or foreign commerce under 18 U.S.C. § 2252, faces fines and a statutory minimum of 5 years to 20 years maximum in prison. Convicted offenders may face harsher penalties if the offender has prior convictions or if the child offense occurred in aggravated situations defined as (i) the images are violent, sadistic, or masochistic in nature, (ii) the minor was sexually abused, or (iii) the offender has prior convictions for child sexual exploitation. In these circumstances, a convicted offender may face up to life imprisonment. laws in addition to, or instead of, federal law.” Today” is used in federal statutes, it is also commonly used by lawmakers, prosecutors, investigators, and the public to describe this form of sexual exploitation of children. However, this term fails to describe the true horror that is faced by countless children every year. The production of child creates a permanent record of a child’s sexual abuse. When these images are placed on the Internet and disseminated online, the victimization of the children continues in perpetuity. Experts and victims agree that victims depicted in child often suffer a lifetime of re-victimization by knowing the images of their sexual abuse are on the Internet forever. The children exploited in these images must live with the permanency, longevity, and circulation of such a record of their sexual victimization. This often creates lasting psychological damage to the child, including disruptions in sexual development, self-image, and developing trusting relationships with others in the future. market. Child images are readily available through virtually every Internet technology, including social networking websites, file-sharing sites, photo-sharing sites, gaming devices, and even mobile apps. Child offenders can also connect on Internet forums and networks to share their interests, desires, and experiences abusing children, in addition to selling, sharing, and trading images. offenders, thereby fostering a larger relationship premised on a shared sexual interest in children. This has the effect of eroding the shame that typically would accompany this behavior, as well as desensitizing those involved to the physical and psychological damage caused to the child victims. For this reason, online communities attract and encourage new individuals to join them in the sexual exploitation of children. continue to use various encryption techniques and anonymous networks on “The Dark Internet”, attempting to hide their amassed collections of illicit child abuse images. Several sophisticated online criminal organizations have even written security manuals to ensure that their members follow preferred security protocols and encryption techniques in an attempt to evade law enforcement and facilitate the sexual abuse of children.. The continuous production and distribution of child increases the demand for new and more egregious images, perpetuating the continued molestation of child victims, as well as the abuse of new children.”, including “sextortion” involving children who are extorted into producing child ; and coercion/enticement of a minor—distribution of child ; possession of child .”, as well as to predators engaging in child sex tourism. The efforts of the CEIU, in addition to ICE’s participation in national programs like Operation Predator and international partnerships like the Virtual Global Taskforce, have resulted in the rescue of thousands of children.“ and/or sexual exploitation of children Victim Assistance (CPVA) Victim Assistance (CPVA) program serves as the central repository for information on identified victims of child . Pursuant to federal statutes, law enforcement may be required to notify victims each time images of their victimization are seized as part of an investigation. The amount and frequency of notifications can be overwhelming, especially as victims may have difficulty coping with the impact of the crime and its ongoing aftermath.
FLORIDA CHILD
11/9/19
Florida child
and 24 counts of possession of child -enhanced, according to a press release by PCSO. and had been viewing it for 22 years.
Is Out of Control: 45 Million Images Exist Online And Things Are Getting Worse images 'worse than actual abuse' are both on the increase JMO.
sting snares two Disney World and Disney Resort employees among 17 men arrested sting
sting in Florida sting.” sting
FLORIDA CHILD
11/9/19
Florida child
stings that happen so often to see exactly what the punishment of each person that was arrested was and to see if all persons were registered on the Sex Offender List.These tech companies that’s reporting are they also shutting down the web sites?It seems like every day there’s a new CP case here. I mean I know this has existed for years and years but sigh with the advancement of the internet it seems to possibly be growing.
So I googled to see if this is indeed increasing, as I’ve started a quite a few CP-related threads lately, including a ring busted which was led by a Cop and a Teacher...
Anyway, upon a quick google these recent articles have come up. I haven’t looked at them yet but wanted to note them somewhere.
Child
September 30, 2019
Continued sharing of child
Exploitation of kids online grows 'exponentially'
Sep 24, 2019
The Internet Is Overrun With Images of Child Sexual Abuse. What Went Wrong?
Sept. 28, 2019
“Last year tech companies reported over 45 million online photos and videos of children being sexually abused, more than double what they found the previous year.”
—-
ETA: Yeah these articles are infinite and seem to confirm my suspicion that things are getting worse with the internet, moo.
Mass shootings and child
