GUILTY FL - Dan Markel, 41, FSU Law Professor, Tallahassee, 18 July 2014 - #8 *arrests*

Status
Not open for further replies.
  • #1,121
GC : Did you call LR on the day of the money drop ?
KG: YES

Respectfully, and not to nitpick you, but it was:

GC: "Did you talk to Luis Rivera on the day of the money drop?"

KM: "Did I talk to him? I believe he called me. Yeah, he called my phone."
 
  • #1,122
If it’s hung, Will KM have to remain in jail until the decision is made to retry the case?
I think someone said yes in a previous post.
 
  • #1,123
I keep having the feeling that the holdout is the lady who asked if she needed to pack her bag for the weekend.
 
  • #1,124
If the jury goes back and does the polling is there an opportunity to continue deliberating and reach a verdict or is it just a mistrial now no matter what? Thanks
 
  • #1,125
  • #1,126
Hey Cappleman, when you try Katie next time, for God's sake, try Charlie A with her.
Right? And go a LOT harder on her in cross examination. That was a soft ball.
 
  • #1,127
Is the jury going back on KM or is hung the final verdict?
 
  • #1,128
  • #1,129
No way will there be an NG for KM. State will re-try her with CA. This all needs to resolved by a jury. JMO.
 
  • #1,130
One thing that has been on my mind has been the incredible arrogance of KM testifying that "after hearing all this evidence" she is convinced CA is responsible for the murder. "All this evidence" has been public knowledge for some time and, certainly, she's known the facts better than anyone. I first learned of this case from the "Over My Dead Body" podcast and after finishing it I googled the case and was stunned at how strong the evidence against CA and DA is. For her to say now disingenuously, "oh my, now I see that Charlie was behind all this" should infuriate any objective juror.
 
  • #1,131
No way she’ll be found NG. It’ll probably remain hung. No way reasonable jurors are going to change their opinion of guilt
 
  • #1,132
If she's retried, does her own testimony in this trial get to be entered into evidence? Even if she doesn't testify?
 
  • #1,133
How can KM be found not guilty? Truth: SG and CA did not know one another...KM is the link. Period.
 
  • #1,134
If she's retried, does her own testimony in this trial get to be entered into evidence? Even if she doesn't testify?
Yes. Sworn testimony is evidence. I think she and her attorneys are going to rue the day she decided to take the stand.
 
  • #1,135
If she's retried, does her own testimony in this trial get to be entered into evidence? Even if she doesn't testify?
My understanding: The State can bring it as evidence against her. But she can't bring it in as evidence for her.
 
  • #1,136
Camera live in court again.
 
  • #1,137
Yes. Sworn testimony is evidence. I think she and her attorneys are going to rue the day she decided to take the stand.

How would they enter that if she didn't testify? What witness would/could they ask about it?
 
  • #1,138
  • #1,139
Is there a lesser charge that would put her away? at least for several years. What are thoughts about CA and DA being indicted??
 
  • #1,140
Status
Not open for further replies.

Staff online

Members online

Online statistics

Members online
115
Guests online
3,382
Total visitors
3,497

Forum statistics

Threads
632,632
Messages
18,629,462
Members
243,231
Latest member
Irena21D
Back
Top