Kawass is bordering on insufferable at this point. Not only is she disingenuous about Katie's morality, she's actually disingenuous about everything including how she completely evaded the very simple question she was responding to. Even the way she asks witnesses "how they are doing?" as if she actually gives a flying how they are doing, is disingenuous.
But perhaps the worst thing about her is that she actually plays very dirty. Despite pre-trial motions barring her from garnering sympathy about Katie's mother dying, her child's autism or the fake "immunity" offer that never happened....she asked direct questions about all of these things, hoping to get them on record. She also tried to get Cappleman tossed off the case based on trumped up allegations that Georgia mislead the court in the first trial, when in fact it was two very minor technical mistakes by witnesses, one of which actually helped the defense. She's on Instagram complaining about the Judge not allowing exculpatory evidence. Just extremely childish and unprofessional behaviour.
In closing, when Kawass challenged Cappleman to explain why Katie wouldn't take a deal, I really liked Georgia's rebuttal but I really wish she would have added: "I'm not going to take up the Defense on their challenge because the Defense didn't even have the guts to live up to their own challenge. In their opening statement, they told you that they were going to prove beyond any doubt that Charlie Adelson and Sigfredo Garcia planned and carried out this murder together behind Katies back. Well, we have been here for 2 weeks. Where is it? What is this proof? I'd love to see it. And I am sure you would too. But we didn't see it because there is not even a shred of evidence of this. Its a fantasy. A made up story. And thats why Ms. Kawass is not talking about this in her closing, so she wants to distract you with anything else. Especially the evidence. She does not want you to look at the evidence."
