FL - FSU Law Professor Dan Markel Murdered by Hitmen #13 *1 guilty*

[katiecoolady]

Okay - I do have those other dates, just needed the one in February!

Should have realized that! I did some poking around and don't see a Feb. date shared yet.

 

[Niner]

Should have realized that! I did some poking around and don't see a Feb. date shared yet.

Okay - thanks for checking it out!

 

[Miss Elizabeth]

Okay - I do have those other dates, just needed the one in February!

Case management hearing is set for 2/24/23.



~ E

 

[Miss Elizabeth]

I find this very interesting, particularly the last paragraph.



~ E

 

[Niner]

Case management hearing is set for 2/24/23.

View attachment 388840

~ E

Thanks a bunch! Much appreciated!

 

[Gardenista]

I find this very interesting, particularly the last paragraph.

View attachment 388842

~ E

TY for posting this. The last paragraph is definitely interesting. Somehow I missed ML's video on SG's letters

 

[katiecoolady]

I find this very interesting, particularly the last paragraph.

View attachment 388842

~ E

This letter is mind blowing, really.

NOW is the time to talk Sigfredo. The only chance your kids ever have of EVER having one of their parents on the outside of prison one day. Gawd, the gall of these killers, all of them.

 

[Miss Elizabeth]

Looks like Magbanua has filed to remove her public defender and replace with her own counsel for her appeal. Lawyers in the group, please review to ensure what I'm saying is correct. Thank you.

~ E

 

[Marysmith]

Looks like Magbanua has filed to remove her public defender and replace with her own counsel for her appeal. Lawyers in the group, please review to ensure what I'm saying is correct. Thank you.

~ E

View attachment 389104

Hmmm… I thought Decoste was representing her still now?

 

[Blue Shakehead]

Looks like Magbanua has filed to remove her public defender and replace with her own counsel for her appeal. Lawyers in the group, please review to ensure what I'm saying is correct. Thank you.

~ E

View attachment 389104

Not a lawyer but my interpretation is that the DCA has granted the previous motion from her appointed appellate attorney to withdraw due to a conflict of interest, and then authorizes the circuit court to appoint her a new appellate attorney. I don't think there is much here.

 

[Miss Elizabeth]

Not a lawyer but my interpretation is that the DCA has granted the previous motion from her appointed appellate attorney to withdraw due to a conflict of interest, and then authorizes the circuit court to appoint her a new appellate attorney. I don't think there is much here.

Thank you for your explanation.

~ E

 

[minusfour]

No further Adelson arrests yet? Sigh. We can wait, but I wish we didn't have too.

 

[jbc]

Why, then, is Tara K. served with this document if she has already recused from Katie's defense?

 

[Seattle1]

Not a lawyer but my interpretation is that the DCA has granted the previous motion from her appointed appellate attorney to withdraw due to a conflict of interest, and then authorizes the circuit court to appoint her a new appellate attorney. I don't think there is much here.

I agree. Saw this also happen with two of the defendants in the Frostproof murders at the trial level.

From KM's Oct 18, 2022 MOTION TO WITHDRAW FROM APPEAL AND FOR APPOINTMENT OF SEPARATE COUNSEL:

[..]

2. This Office was appointed to represent Ms. Magbanua on appeal on October 13, 2022, nunc pro tunc to July 29, 2022. The record on appeal has not yet been e-filed. There is a pending order to show cause issued to trial counsel dated October 10, 2022.

3. This office cannot represent Ms. Magbanua on direct appeal without a conflict of interest. The nature of the conflict is personal conflict because the victim in this case was a Florida State University Law school professor.

4. This Office previously withdrew at the trial level for a co-defendant, who testified as a State witness, after consulting with The Florida Bar.
The Florida Bar informed this Office that it could not ethically represent any of the defendants in this case. Subsequently, this Office moved to withdraw from another co-defendant’s direct appeal in December 2019 in case no. 1D19-4005. This Court granted the motion to withdraw.

https://edca.1dca.org/DcaDocs/2022/2733/2022-2733_Motion_473124_MO44202D20Motion20To20Withdraw20as20Counsel.pdf

 

[Seattle1]

Why, then, is Tara K. served with this document if she has already recused from Katie's defense?

She's copied because Attorney Tara Kawass was referenced in KM's 11/28/22 Amended Motion:

5. This Office is precluded from revealing privileged and confidential client information. Smith v. State, 156 So.3d 1119, 1125 (Fla. 1st DCA 2015). Undersigned counsel has spoken with Ms. Magbanua's trial attorney, Ms. Kawass, regarding this appeal.

6. Ms. Magbanua has the right to conflict-free counsel.

https://edca.1dca.org/DcaDocs/2022/2733/2022-2733_Motion_473926_MO44202D20Motion20To20Withdraw20as20Counsel.pdf

 

[Miss Elizabeth]

I agree. Saw this also happen with two of the defendants in the Frostproof murders at the trial level.

From KM's Oct 18, 2022 MOTION TO WITHDRAW FROM APPEAL AND FOR APPOINTMENT OF SEPARATE COUNSEL:

[..]

2. This Office was appointed to represent Ms. Magbanua on appeal on October 13, 2022, nunc pro tunc to July 29, 2022. The record on appeal has not yet been e-filed. There is a pending order to show cause issued to trial counsel dated October 10, 2022.

3. This office cannot represent Ms. Magbanua on direct appeal without a conflict of interest. The nature of the conflict is personal conflict because the victim in this case was a Florida State University Law school professor.

4. This Office previously withdrew at the trial level for a co-defendant, who testified as a State witness, after consulting with The Florida Bar.
The Florida Bar informed this Office that it could not ethically represent any of the defendants in this case. Subsequently, this Office moved to withdraw from another co-defendant’s direct appeal in December 2019 in case no. 1D19-4005. This Court granted the motion to withdraw.

https://edca.1dca.org/DcaDocs/2022/2733/2022-2733_Motion_473124_MO44202D20Motion20To20Withdraw20as20Counsel.pdf

Thank you - I should have read the previous docs before posting!

~ E

 

[Bongo]

Did anyone else find Daniel Rashbaum's comment yesterday "the prison has been terrific!" right in front of Charlie a little....bizarre?

I bet it's not been so terrific for Charlie! I mean helpful, cooperative, even "good to deal with."

But "terrific?"

It did kind of make me laugh though.

I feel like the distinction is only really meaningful to those who have experienced both jail and prison.

 

[katiecoolady]

I feel like the distinction is only really meaningful to those who have experienced both jail and prison.

I think the effusiveness of "terrific" was what was the most bizarre. Wonder how Charlie felt sitting there hearing his prison/jail experience being described as "terrific". #nolobsterforyou

 

[Seattle1]

I think the effusiveness of "terrific" was what was the most bizarre. Wonder how Charlie felt sitting there hearing his prison/jail experience being described as "terrific". #nolobsterforyou

I wouldn't be surprised to learn that CA uses "terrific" with his attorney.
In one of the YT blogs that lists CA's jailhouse call logs, there was also a report written on 11/17/22 (the date he received the MP3 player) by a jail guard that asked how he was doing physically and mentally pre-holiday season where CA actually used "fine" and "great" to describe himself.

 

[katiecoolady]

I wouldn't be surprised to learn that CA uses "terrific" with his attorney.
In one of the YT blogs that lists CA's jailhouse call logs, there was also a report written on 11/17/22 (the date he received the MP3 player) by a jail guard that asked how he was doing physically and mentally pre-holiday season where CA actually used "fine" and "great" to describe himself.

They do say sociopaths transition surprisingly easy to the prison system.