Are you referring to WA in the second paragraph? She is not a widow, since she and Dan were already divorced by the time he was murdered. As for aging out of the job market: she's a lawyer, a field where experience counts for much more than youth. I agree that her reputation is a liability, however, since being followed around by whispers of maybe being involved in a murder doesn't exactly inspire confidence.I hope the boys are being taken care of and wish them only the best. If what you say is correct and I certainly don't know differently, that would hardly cover WAs spa treatments, hair extensions and Botox. Not to mention her blue contacts.
I don't mean to be disparaging of the widow but she is not a likeable person and I know she has attempted employment over the years but the reputation she has earned will only continue to become a hardship for her as she ages out of the job market. Maybe her situation is too messy for some fields as well as being 'arm candy' for some lucky fella. I'm already beginning to feel sorry for her.
Roman is about 8 years old. His "baby mama" (I hate the term, yet somehow in CA's case it seems appropriate) is a woman called Brianna Price. She was upset because the audio recordings of her phone calls to CA in prison were publicly released: in them, she asks CA to marry her and he turns her down flat. She was also upset because little Roman's voice could be heard on some of the calls.There is nothing to prevent her from using any money in any fashion. Maybe no conviction for either WA or HA but drain their resources and shame them into oblivion but anyone who thinks murder is a solution for your inconvenience is shameless.
I wonder about her boys. Are they following the family gene of privilege and selfishness or have they had an exposure to real people? Did WA even want children or is that what she was supposed to do?
Not much is known about CA's son Roman?? How old is he and who is his mother? DA wasn't as dedicated to him, was she?
Ok, then Black Widow. Emerita.Are you referring to WA in the second paragraph? She is not a widow, since she and Dan were already divorced by the time he was murdered.
I just watched
The "UNREDACTED" Interview of Jeffrey Lacasse
For the first time. It is so revealing. Wendi is definitely materially involved in the conspiracy. Her only defense is INSANITY.
Agreed, and the realtor testimony didn't make the point that the defense thought it did. The dates were presented in a confusing way, and the fact that no house was purchased undercut the defense's point, if anything.Nothing in yesterday's defense testimonies resonated with me. Friends said Donna seemed shocked and upset about Dan's killing and CA's guilty conviction. But of course that is how she would have acted in front of friends if they weren't aware of her role. She would play the 'victim'.
Regarding PI testimonies.... neither taped the conversation so we have to take their word and there isn't a full video that prosecution could have used to test the veracity of the statements or use other topics that might have been discussed. Patricia Byrd already didn't have a lot of credibility, so no comments there scored points for the defense.
The prison video added nothing other than confirm that DA wrote in the informant's journal. Which is damning for defense.
So far the defense hasn't made any significant inroads into the prosecution's strong case. IMO.
Yes, like this divorce had absolutely nothing to do with what happened to DM. Cross examination is going to be interesting to watch.This witness is making the divorce/settlement sound alot different than we have been led to believe. She is making it sound like Wendi would have prevailed, not Danny, at least on the marital assets argument.
I don't understand why they brought in this witness, unless they want to make it seem like DA knew very little about the divorce proceedings. If I was on the jury, I wouldn't buy it.Are we going to rehash all the details of WA and DM messy divorce fillings? Is the defense trying to make DM look bad and justify his murder? Why this is being brought up in such biased detail just doesn't seem right to me.....JMOO