FL - Jennifer Kesse, 24, Orlando, 24 Jan 2006 - #11

[chickenfriedcow]

I just discovered Jennifer's case yesterday, and I've been trying to examine the POI video. Something about this person's clothing seems off to me. It almost looks to me like they're purposefully wearing clothes that don't fit, even shoes that are too big. It makes me wonder, are these even their clothes at all? I wonder if this person dressed this way on purpose, possibly to throw any descriptions off, or to avoid leaving any footprints or other fiber evidence traceable back to them? The short sleeved shirt doesn't make much sense to me for trying to not leave evidence, but the clothes just look like they fit oddly, especially the shoes!

I do think the outfit does resemble that of a labor worker or even a kitchen worker of some kind, but the huge black shoes and just the general fit of the clothing compared with the persons frame make me wonder if this person was trying to disguise themselves, or maybe just wore clothes that weren't theirs to avoid leaving evidence somehow. Very odd.

 

[Jennibee]

You could be totally right. It would completely throw everyone off the whole construction worker scenario that seems to be the number one theory.

 

[Skully]

You could be totally right. It would completely throw everyone off the whole construction worker scenario that seems to be the number one theory.

You have to wonder if this was a husband/wife team or bf/gf team. She may have dressed that way to hid her ID, if she knew the cameras were there. Their have been serial killers that use the wife or gf to trick or lure the victim. The wife or gf is also a victim but over time, they help the killer because now they are not the victim. Wonder if this has been looked at? Any new couples she may have had contact with? Just enough that if the woman knocked at her door she would open it to her.

 

[tricket]

Hmmm. I'm not saying it's not possible, and it's good to look at other possibilities, but unless it was someone she knew it seems a little farfetched. I tend to think it happened after she left her apartment, either in the way to get car or at her car because her purse is missing...I know those coveralls look big for the poi, but I t think most coveralls come in one size fits all. I just hope somehow some new clues are found or something, it has been too long without answers

 

[Maggie2]

As much as I subscribe to the theory that she was taken by one of the construction workers at her complex, I can't help but think that the POI in the video is a woman.

 

[Skully]

Hmmm. I'm not saying it's not possible, and it's good to look at other possibilities, but unless it was someone she knew it seems a little farfetched. I tend to think it happened after she left her apartment, either in the way to get car or at her car because her purse is missing...I know those coveralls look big for the poi, but I t think most coveralls come in one size fits all. I just hope somehow some new clues are found or something, it has been too long without answers

I thought her cloths were still laid out on the bed and the shower stall was still wet. Am I remembering this wrong?

 

[Skully]

As much as I subscribe to the theory that she was taken by one of the construction workers at her complex, I can't help but think that the POI in the video is a woman.

I thought that too, I mean it could be a man who is small in stature, there are small built men. But the body just looks female to me. Also is it possible that the shoes we see, that some think are big, could it be something you wear over the shoe to protect it from paint?

 

[tricket]

No, they were. This is a bit ambiguous because she may have chosen to wear something else or someone came in her apartment while she was getting ready, or in the shower, creepy

 

[Skully]

No, they were. This is a bit ambiguous because she may have chosen to wear something else or someone came in her apartment while she was getting ready, or in the shower, creepy

Being a woman, I don't think I have ever laid out cloths, decide to wear something else and then, didn't put back what I had out. I think she was very neat, clean and orderly. Her job required that of her, and I don't think she left in her cloths. I think she got a shower, and maybe when she stepped out and was toweling off to dry, someone or something interrupted her. Like the doorbell rang. This person was waiting for her. Maybe they forced their way in, IDK, but I also remember something about a key chain, for the mailbox or her door. I don't remember now. I could be way off, but the wet shower and the cloths made me think of this. I used to think she was grabbed at the car, or perhaps just as she was locking the front door. Still a possibility, but the cloths bother me.

 

[tricket]

I won't disagree with you on that. I know the workers had keys to the apartments. I just don't know anymore. Its good to open our minds to other possibilities.

 

[bucshunter]

I'm thinking it happened in parking lot, pulled up alongside her vehicle in a van and abducted her. Because her purse, phone, etc was also missing.

 

[Skully]

You are probably right. I know it probably doesn't matter, but, did anyone ever go through her cloths with the bf or someone who knew what she owned and see what was missing? Maybe they could figure out what she had on that day. I know that would have been hard, but some times pictures of what you have on, or people remember outfits, like us girls, maybe someone would say, this or that is not here. She may have been in the habit of setting out several outfits at a time. I just see her coming back from the trip and lots of cloths to wash, or put away.

 

[Topcat]

I'm thinking it happened in parking lot, pulled up alongside her vehicle in a van and abducted her. Because her purse, phone, etc was also missing.

Then why take her car? It serves no purpose if she was the target of an abduction.

 

[tricket]

Speaking of her car, I wonder if le searched other cameras in the area to see if they could capture the driver from when the driver brought the car back? And why bring her car back to a complex rather than leave it on the side of a road...

 

[Topcat]

Speaking of her car, I wonder if le searched other cameras in the area to see if they could capture the driver from when the driver brought the car back? And why bring her car back to a complex rather than leave it on the side of a road...

Unless the perp had to return to the area for some unknown reason to us.

 

[tricket]

Like to get back to work?

 

[Topcat]

Like to get back to work?

Work,home or visiting someone

 

[STANDREID]

As much as I subscribe to the theory that she was taken by one of the construction workers at her complex, I can't help but think that the POI in the video is a woman.

That's because it's Jennifer.:thinking:

 

[Skully]

Then why take her car? It serves no purpose if she was the target of an abduction.

You know you're right. If they came to take her away and then returned the car, why? Unless they used the car for something else and then returned it. Or she was already in the car when they ambushed her. Or they didn't have a car and took her's, but again, that doesn't make sense. So did anything else happen in the area that would involve a car, like a robbery or some other crime? Israel Keyes would move the victims car or use it IIRC in a crime. Possible that they use Jennifer's car because it was like a car jacking, but ended up killing her in the process? Just throwing stuff out there. I have been thinking of Keyes lately and there is another posted who thinks this could be what happened to Jennifer too, that Keyes was responsible. I thought of him when we learned he had ties to FL and he had been in Orlando in 2009. Funny how those SK end up here in FL.

 

[bucshunter]

Then why take her car? It serves no purpose if she was the target of an abduction.

Moved it to keep LE off the trail...it kind of worked they found the car two days later.