Every time I see a comment about Maddie supposedly making a comment about living in the woods when she was 13 it makes me wonder if not only was it SS, but that that was part of his plan. As you all know, she was found in a wooded area. So, if his plan hadn't backfired on him, perhaps he was hoping they'd think she ran away "to live in the woods", and that unfortunately someone saw her out there and killed her before SS and Maddie's mom could go out and find her to bring her home.
I, too, have considered this option. There is just something off about that "living in the woods statement".
However, looking at everything else this guy did, I find it very, very unlikely that he'd have the brains or even opportunity to send the text beforehand. And if the text was undeleted (as I assume, because mum found it), then Madeline would have seen the text at least the next time she messaged said friend and would surely have been freaked about it.
So at this time, I think Madeline sent it. The question is why (could just be e.g inspired by a book she read, but still).
Teenage girl, been with family all day, excited about gifts and doesn't contact friends telling them about their day and gifts?
I am honestly bamboozled that so many of you find this unbelievable. I could name like 10+ kids like that from the top of my head. Might be a cultural thing.
But there is a lot of assumptions here: that she had close friends, that she and her friends chatted online about daily matters at home, that they were able to do this late at night (some parents collect cellphones for the night), that she was exited about gifts, that telling others about her gifts is a thing she even does, that she did find the gifts "worthy" of bragging about, etc.
These are middle schoolers, not kindergarteners. It’s a normal time for freedoms to be increasing which, for some kids, could mean walking or riding a bike to school on their own.
And let's face the facts: this case (nor similar Audrii case) had
nothing, absolutely nothing to do with walking to school any distance. She was killed by a male known to her and family who assaulted her in her family home (most probably and at least on one occasion).
If people want to ban stuff, ban stepdads living with non-biological kids. Or men living with anyone, tbh. Or dicks.
Not kids walking.
Out of the countless cases like this that I’ve followed over the years, I’ve never seen any killer try anything like that. This guy carried out this crime like he’d never even thought about it before.
Yes, IMO, it does look very disorganized and made-up-as-I-go.
This creep had a "good thing going" in that he had a victim he had easy and continued access to. SOMETHING happened for him to decide to get rid of her.
BBM. I don't think we know that he
decided anything.
It is possible he killed her because it was his plan to kill her for some reason. But it is also possible, that he killed her without planning to do so: could have been drugging her for assaults and gotten it wrong, could be that he likes to strangle victims during the assault, could be that the victim was resisting him vocally and he suffocated her accidentally the keep her quiet, could be that the victim was resisting him physically and he killed her during a struggle, could be that he "got carried away" and did kill her on purpose at the moment, but had not been planning to do so prior the attack. I'm sure there are even more options.
Just looking at the way he dealt with it, he either did not plan it ahead or he is
very stupid or he was high on something or all of the above.