GUILTY FL - Megan Todt 42, Alek 13, Tyler 11, Zoe 4, & dog Breezy, murdered, Celebration, Jan 2020 #2

Over 6 months since the last post about the monster Todt. What is the status of his appeal? Anyone?


On this site, below are the updates from 2023.

1/3/2023: ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF TRANSFERRED CASE 6D23-1278
Info: The Sixth District Court of Appeal has received the APPEAL reflecting a filing date of April 22, 2022 on transfer from a District Court of Appeal where the previous case number was 5D22-0994.

5/11/2023: MANDATE: PER CURIAM AFFIRMED, 6D23-1278 - RECORDED (OR.6406.795. / 2023060947)
Info: PER CURIAM. AFFIRMED.

5/19/2023: ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF NEW CASE (PETITION) 6D23-2664
Info: The Sixth District Court of Appeal has received the PETITION reflecting a filing date of May 19, 2023. Petition - Ineffective Assistance of Counsel Criminal.

6/5/2023: NOTICE OF ARREST OR PENDING PROSECUTION OF LAW ENFORCEMENT OFFICER WITNESS
Info: There is a pending prosecution against a law enforcement officer who has been listed by the State as a witness in the above-styled criminal case, to wit:
1. Deputy DC of the Osceola County Sheriff’s Office.
2. This new arrest or prosecution has been given case number: 2022-KM-000752 for Culpable Negligence with Personal Injury, and will be prosecuted in Osceola County.

6/9/2013: NOTICE OF ARREST OR PENDING PROSECUTION OF LAW ENFORCEMENT OFFICER WITNESS
Info:
There is a pending prosecution against a law enforcement officer who has been listed by the State as a witness in the above-styled criminal case, to wit:
1. Deputy DC of the Osceola County Sheriff’s Office.
2. This new arrest or prosecution has been given case number: 2023-MM-003655 for Culpable Negligence with Personal Injury and will be prosecuted in Orange County.

6/12/2023: ORDER OF THE COURT, 6TH DCA, STATE TO FILE RESPONSE TO PETITIONER'S PETITION, 6D23-2664
Info:
Respondent shall serve a response to petitioner's petition alleging ineffective assistance of appellate counsel within 30 days. The State's response shall include, in an appendix, any portions of the appellate record on which the respondent relies. Petitioner may serve a reply within 30 days thereafter.

6/26/2023: NOTICE OF PLACEMENT OF A STATE WITNESS ON THE STATE'S BRADY LIST
Info: The State hereby gives notice, pursuant to Fla. R. Crim. Pro. 3.220, and pursuant to Brady v. Maryland, 373 U.S. 83 (1963) that the individual who is listed below has been placed on the State’s Brady List, to wit: DC of the Osceola County Sheriff's Office
 
Based on the court site linked above, there is one update.

2/15/24: PRO SE DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR POST CONVICTION RELIEF UNDER 3.850 ALLEGING INEFFECTIVE ASSISTANCE OF TRIAL COUNSEL AND RULE 3.850(B) NEWLY DISCOVERED EVIDENCE
 
Based on the court site linked above, there are two updates.

06/20/24: ORDER OF THE COURT, 6DCA, MOTION DENIED
06/20/24: ORDER OF THE COURT, 6DCA, PETITION DENIED
Thanks Countem. Any idea what this means - is it connected with Todt’s appeal? I re-watched some of his testimony last night, wonder how he would go if he didn’t take the stand himself, he is just so repelling (as in opposite of compelling).
 
Thanks Countem. Any idea what this means - is it connected with Todt’s appeal? I re-watched some of his testimony last night, wonder how he would go if he didn’t take the stand himself, he is just so repelling (as in opposite of compelling).
I assume that it is the motion from 02/15 that is denied, but they have not yet uploaded the documents to verify.
 
https://courts.osceolaclerk.com/BenchmarkWeb/Home.aspx/Search

Below are the updates since 06/20:

06/28/2024: (PRO SE) AMENDED MOTION FOR POST CONVICTION RELIEF 3.850 ALLEGING INEFFECTIVE ASSISTANCE OF TRIAL COUNSEL AND RULE 3.850(B) NEWLY DISCOVERED EVIDENCE (COPY SENT TO JUDGE)

07/16/2024: PRO SE AMENDED CERTIFICATE OF MAILING (COPY SENT TO JUDGE)
 
https://courts.osceolaclerk.com/BenchmarkWeb/Home.aspx/Search

Below are the updates since 06/20:

06/28/2024: (PRO SE) AMENDED MOTION FOR POST CONVICTION RELIEF 3.850 ALLEGING INEFFECTIVE ASSISTANCE OF TRIAL COUNSEL AND RULE 3.850(B) NEWLY DISCOVERED EVIDENCE (COPY SENT TO JUDGE)

07/16/2024: PRO SE AMENDED CERTIFICATE OF MAILING (COPY SENT TO JUDGE)
Hm. Wonder what the new evidence is. Pro Se means he doesn't have an attorney, right?
 
https://courts.osceolaclerk.com/BenchmarkWeb/Home.aspx/Search

Below are the updates since 06/20:

06/28/2024: (PRO SE) AMENDED MOTION FOR POST CONVICTION RELIEF 3.850 ALLEGING INEFFECTIVE ASSISTANCE OF TRIAL COUNSEL AND RULE 3.850(B) NEWLY DISCOVERED EVIDENCE (COPY SENT TO JUDGE)

07/16/2024: PRO SE AMENDED CERTIFICATE OF MAILING (COPY SENT TO JUDGE)

He filed that same stuff on 2/15/24 per my notes....
per my notes:

2/15/24 Docket update: Pro Se defendant's motion for post conviction relief under Rule 3.850 alleging ineffective counsel & Rule 3.850(B) newly discovered evidence.
6/20/24 Docket update: Order of the Court, 6DCA, Motion Denied & Petition Denied.
 
He filed that same stuff on 2/15/24 per my notes....
per my notes:

2/15/24 Docket update: Pro Se defendant's motion for post conviction relief under Rule 3.850 alleging ineffective counsel & Rule 3.850(B) newly discovered evidence.
6/20/24 Docket update: Order of the Court, 6DCA, Motion Denied & Petition Denied.
That June 28 2024 action says "amended motion". Too bad we can't see the motions, how that last was amended.
 
https://courts.osceolaclerk.com/BenchmarkWeb/Home.aspx/Search

Below are the updates since 08/04:

09/09/2024: DEFENDANT'S PRO SE SECOND AMENDED MOTION FOR POST CONVICTION RELIEF (COPY TO JUDGE)

09/16/2024: ORDER OF THE COURT, 6DCA, MOTION FOR REHEARING DENIED, 6D23-2664

09/17/2024: DEFENDANT'S NOTICE OF INQUIRY (COPY SENT TO JUDGE)

10/22/2024: (PRO SE) NOTICE OF JUDICIAL NOTICE PURSUANT TO 90.202 AND 90.203 FLA.STAT. (COPY SENT TO JUDGE)
 
Sadly, the PDFs have been requested but have not yet been updated in the system. Once I am able to see them, I will post here!
The documents have been uploaded to the court system at the link in my last post. However, I am currently accessing files by my cellphone, and, unfortunately, the two amended pro se filings are over 200 pages long, so they would be difficult for me to sort through. :( If someone is able to take a peek, it would be appreciated!
 
The documents have been uploaded to the court system at the link in my last post. However, I am currently accessing files by my cellphone, and, unfortunately, the two amended pro se filings are over 200 pages long, so they would be difficult for me to sort through. :( If someone is able to take a peek, it would be appreciated!
Is this what you are looking for? It is the most recent filing. I could not get the 200+ page document to upload.
 

Attachments

Last edited:
I am new here but have looked and looked, even on the Osceola County Website, but can't find it. I am looking for the whole Witness List from the trail! Does anyone have it? I'd rather not go through all days of video to find the names etc.
Thank you and happy Sleuthing!
 
https://courts.osceolaclerk.com/BenchmarkWeb/Home.aspx/Search

Below are the updates since 11/03/24:

11/08/24 ORDER DIRECTING STATE TO FILE RESPONSE
11/08/24 ORDER DIRECTING STATE TO FILE RESPONSE
11/18/24 MANDATE FILED: PETITION DENIED, 6D23-2664
11/20/24 NOTICE OF ARREST OR PENDING PROSECUTION OF LAW ENFORCEMENT OFFICER WITNESS
1/13/25 STATE OF FLORIDAS MOTION FOR TRANSCRIPTION
1/15/25 ORDER GRANTING STATE OF FLORIDA'S MOTION FOR TRANSCRIPTION
1/16/25 STATE OF FLORIDA'S FIRST MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE RESPONSE
1/29/25 ORDER ON STATE OF FLORIDA'S FIRST MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE RESPONSE- GRANTED
1/31/25 (PRO SE) DEFENDANT'S RESPONSE TO STATE OF FLORIDA'S FIRST MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE RESPONSE (COPY TO CHAMBERS)
 

Members online

Online statistics

Members online
86
Guests online
392
Total visitors
478

Forum statistics

Threads
625,550
Messages
18,506,038
Members
240,815
Latest member
Ms Scarlett 86
Back
Top