FL FL - Michelle Parker, 33, Orlando, 17 Nov 2011 - # 7

Status
Not open for further replies.
  • #101
Dale's statement about her saying she was going shopping also conflicts with what Michelle's sister said her plans were. IIRC, Michelle told her sister she was going to drop the twins off then go home and take a nap before work, or something to that effect.


yep, that's what she said. I always try to stick with statements that are said early on. That being said, the media in the last few years has made it so hard to follow and separate fact from sensationalism.
 
  • #102
[/B]
bbm
Thats one of the points I missed. Do we know for sure that the 11 yr old didn't call until 6:50? Was Michelle pretty consistent in getting home for his arrival from school? I would really like to hear more on that. We do know she never missed a day of work and from accounts she was on time. That leads me to believe she was very time oriented and consistent in her routine. That makes me question DS statement that she was going shopping after dropping the twins off.

It was Michelle's sister "recently" that stated the child didn't call his grandmother until 6:50.

I sure would like to know more myself. :crazy:
 
  • #103
Yikes, I'm gonna have to fix this puter....it is soooooooooooooo slow! Every time I try to refresh it takes almost five minutes to get back!

It's not your puter, I am having problems too!
 
  • #104
I hope the Fl court takes little Tierra fate into consideration with MP's twins!
 
  • #105
It's not your puter, I am having problems too!

That's because we have soooo many windows open. No need to alert Adnoid!!
 
  • #106
yep, that's what she said. I always try to stick with statements that are said early on. That being said, the media in the last few years has made it so hard to follow and separate fact from sensationalism.

In the beginning, when Michelle's sister stated she was going to dropped the children off, I had always thought that the children were with Michelle at that time she was at the salon.

It wasn't until the other day that I heard about the daycare center, and perhaps it should have been reported clearer as: "she left the salon at 2:30 PM to PICK up her children at the daycare and then DROP them off at their father's condo."

Heck, there was one other person that saw Michelle, and that was the daycare person, before Michelle got to Dale's.

Not that it matters because Michelle picked up the children, but it sure had another person in the picture that saw her. Who is this person and why haven't we heard about the daycare person?
 
  • #107
  • #108
  • #109
It was Michelle's sister "recently" that stated the child didn't call his grandmother until 6:50.

I sure would like to know more myself. :crazy:

Yesterday I posted a video link from Today (from 11/29), and quoted a portion of the transcript where it said the nephew called at 6:50 pm.

Here's the link, the sister starts talking around the 3:00 mark and she mentions the nephew around the 5:00 mark:

http://today.msnbc.msn.com/id/45475...ng-womans-sister-im-not-surprised-ex-suspect/
 
  • #110
un uh I don't believe you! lol:floorlaugh:

OK, I lied, I have my bedroom window open. :floorlaugh: :floorlaugh:

Really, I am not recording Nancy so I only have one window open. :) :hug:
 
  • #111
In the beginning, when Michelle's sister stated she was going to dropped the children off, I had always thought that the children were with Michelle at that time she was at the salon.

It wasn't until the other day that I heard about the daycare center, and perhaps it should have been reported clearer as: "she left the salon at 2:30 PM to PICK up her children at the daycare and then DROP them off at their father's condo."

Heck, there was one other person that saw Michelle, and that was the daycare person, before Michelle got to Dale's.

Not that it matters because Michelle picked up the children, but it sure had another person in the picture that saw her. Who is this person and why haven't we heard about the daycare person?


Now I have to ask if the twins were at a daycare center....where is the day care center and how does that fit into the timeline?
 
  • #112
  • #113
Now I have to ask if the twins were at a daycare center....where is the day care center and how does that fit into the timeline?

Respectfully, let me find my crystal ball. :great:

I have no clue how far the daycare is from the salon. Although the link posted earlier with lots of wrong information states 11 miles.

No clue how they know 11 miles because we didn't even uncover there was a daycare center until the other day, and that was through Michelle's sister. I don't even think the media has added it to their timeline.

One of our locals indicated that they have driven the route from the salon to Dale's and it has taken them about 30 to 35 minutes. This is without stopping to pick up children at a daycare, put them in their car seat and get on the road.

Google map says it should take 26 minutes, but of course, they never include traffic, accidents, lights, time of day, pick ups along the way and so on.
 
  • #114
Thank you. I did listen to the show and that is when I got really confused.

You don't say. :D

Just when I think I have everything down, they change one of the times and throw in some random quote, and I feel lost and crazy all over again. LOL
 
  • #115
You don't say. :D

Just when I think I have everything down, they change one of the times and throw in some random quote, and I feel lost and crazy all over again. LOL
:hug:
 
  • #116
Yesterday I posted a video link from Today (from 11/29), and quoted a portion of the transcript where it said the nephew called at 6:50 pm.

Here's the link, the sister starts talking around the 3:00 mark and she mentions the nephew around the 5:00 mark:

http://today.msnbc.msn.com/id/45475...ng-womans-sister-im-not-surprised-ex-suspect/

Hearing that the 11 yr old did not hear from his mom, and called looking for her at 6:50 makes me even more suspicious of Dales story. He said she left at 4:10 to go shopping. If that were true, imo, she would have called her son to let him know. An 11 yr old is capable of spending time home alone, but needs to be in contact with a parent. I am sure she would have called and checked that he was home safe from school if she could have.
 
  • #117
If Michelle was in the habit of calling her son to check to make sure he was home from school, Dale would have know Michelle's habits.

I would think if the 11 year old didn't hear from his mother because she always calls him to make sure he got home from school, I find it odd that he didn't call someone a lot sooner, or perhaps try and call his mother himself.

If Michelle was not the type to call and check on her son, then that leaves a lot of opportunity because Dale would know no one would be looking for Michelle for a while.

At one point we heard Michelle was going to have dinner with her new bf before she went to work, however, we never got a time on when this was suppose to happen.

So many unanswered questions.
 
  • #118
Michelle, so many are looking for you,so many that don't even know you. To Yvonne, I admire your extreme will and dedication to finding your daughter. You are doing everything right to keep Michelle in the public's eye to find her.
May tomorrow bring answers in finding you Shelly.
 
  • #119
OK the information in that article is not quite accurate.
http://[link removed]/viewArticle.action?articleId=281474980847350#.TtlwMIl5zfM.twitter

Never heard this one before: Michelle and her new boyfriend, Nathan Mitchell are having morning coffee. Unless I missed reading it.

There have been speculations as to when the show did air; some reports claim 2 pm while others aim for 3 pm. It is a matter of time-zones and networks. There are no speculation on when the showed aired. It started at 2:00 PM and ended at 3:00 PM and I believe their case was heard first between 2:00 - 2:30 PM

Around 3:15 pm, surveillance footage captures Michelle driving to Smith's home. Just 15 minutes later, her 11-year-old son contacts his grandmother, Yvonne, because Michelle Parker is not home. We know now that the 11 year old didn't call his grandmother until 6:50.

--i have never put any stock in "[link removed]" articles.

--they're written by 'members' that scour the web and throw something together.

--very unreliable.
 
  • #120
Within all the much talked about searching that was done today at another area pond(this one due to a specific tip stating a new hole cut in the fence&fresh tire tracks).. In the midst of all of that there was some extremely important news that came to light that I personally have been waiting for before I broached the subject that I'm about to..

That all important info is more of a clarification/verification from DSJr's neighbor who has the video surveillance.. He states that his timestamp on the video IS ABSOLUTELY CORRECT AND THAT IT WAS 3:18pm when Michelle's hummer is seen approaching Dale's condo.. He says that the time is only a mere 2 seconds off.. This validating what we thought we know from way Back near the beginning.. We now know for certain..

So, I would like to discuss and hear others opinions on what they believe is going on with this flip-flopping of the time Michelle dropped off the twins.. IMO THERE IS SOMETHING OF HUGE SIGNIFIGANCE AT PLAY HERE WITH MICHELLE'S ARRIVAL TIME!! can anyone make sense of why would Lauren Erickson, just two days ago on 11/30 get on a globally broadcast PRIMETIME NEWS CAST and make certain to state that the timestamp on the video of Michelle'sHummer WAS ABSOLUTELY INCORRECT TIME OF 3:18pm.. SHE FURTHER STATES THAT NOT ONLY IS 3:18pm INCORRECT BUT THAT THE ACTUAL CORRECT TIME THAT MICHELLE ARRIVED AT DALE's WITH THE TWINS WAS 4:00pm!!

If not even more important is what she IMMEDIATELY STATES AFTER GIVING THE NEW&CORRECTED TIME OF MICHELLE's ARRIVAL at 4:00pm.. It's followed by her saying that even Dale told her&family upon first speaking with them on the night of 11/17 and their asking him when did he last see Michelle.. Lauren states that Dale's account of the events was that Michelle arrived at the condo with the twins at 4:00pm, he says they talked for 10minutes with Michelle telling him she was headed to go shopping and that is when she left his condo.. Again this is Dale's original statement made to Michelle's family on 11/17.. And Lauren makes sure to include all of Dale's acct including the 4:00pm arrival time ON THIS GLOBALLY BROADCAST PRIMETIME NEWS STATION.. why??

As we had validated for us today by the very man whose video surveillance camera and video is what captured these last known images of Michelle as she arrived at DSJr and now know FOR A FACT THAT SHE DID ARRIVE AT 3:18pm.. His timestamp is only a mere 2 seconds "off"..this is a fact derived strait from it's originating source(the horse's mouth)..
What is the motive for Lauren publicly making known a completely false and untrue important detail of thhis case??.. I truly am anxious to hear what many of you, my fellow sleuths believe to be the motive or the "plan".. What's to be accomplished from making adamant public statement altering what essentially is the most important detail of the whole entire case.. The time Michelle arrived at Dale's condo with the twins??

In breaking it down and putting it out there just exactly what it is that I'm talking about and why I am very much questioning what SIGNIFIGANCE is at play with this major detail of this entire case.. Look at who and when this detail has been altered just thus far..

1) 3:18pm is the timestamp we all saw on the video showing Michelle's Hummer arriving with the twins at Dale's condo on 11/17. Publicly reported by multiple news agencies that Michelle arrived at 3:18pm.

2) Dale Smith JR's ORIGINAL and very first account of the events of 11/17 to her family. This acct was given the night of 11/17 when the family first spoke with Dale and ask him when was the last time he saw Michelle?.. Dale's acct is Michelle and the twins arrive at his condo at 4:00pm, they chat/talk for 10mins, she tells him she is headed to go "shopping", and leaves the condo.[this stated by Lauren Erickson publicly]

3) Mark NeJame is retained by Dale Smith Jr.. NeJame immediately holds a presser where he publicly outlined a timeline of the events as they occurred that day(11/17) and using this timeline as defense against his clients involvement in Michelle's disappearance by claiming there just is such a small and definite window of opportunity that was available and due to that it was just not humanly possible his client could have murdered Michelle and disposed of her body.. NeJame's timeline states that Michelle and the twins arrive at Dale's condo at 3:18pm and that 72 short minutes later Dale and the twins arrive across town at his dad's house..(MOO.. I love NeJame to death but IMOO I believe it was very very stupid what he did in that presser and for him to literally lay out a timeline publicly..I just do not know what he was thinking ESPECIALLY GIVEN THE FACT THAT THE TIMELINE DIRECTLY CONTRADICTS HIS VERY OWN CLIENTS ACCOUNT HE GAVE TO THE VICTIMS FAMILY(ie. Michelle didn't arrive til 4:00pm).. All just MOO, tho..)

4) On 11/30 the victim's sister, Lauren Erickson appeared live via phone interview on a GLOBALLY BROADCAST PRIMETIME NEWS CAST and made a bold statement that the video surveillance time of 3:18pm showing Michelle's Hummer arriving at Dale Jr's condo(and she did state that it was in fact Michelle's Hummer seen on that footage).. BUT THE TIME OF HER ARRIVAL AT 3:18pm WAS ABSOLUTELY INCORRECT.. wanting to make sure and publicly correct Michelle's arrival time as 4:00pm.. Even more interesting she follows the corrected arrival time of 4:00pm quoting what Dale Smith Jr's ORIGINAL ACCT OF EVENTS OF 11/17 was that he personally stated to Michelle's family when they first spoke with him the evening of 11/17.. The family asked Dale Jr when was the last time he saw Michelle.. Dale told the family that Michelle and the twins arrived at his condo at 4:00pm, they chatted/talked for 10mins, that Michelle told Dale that she was the headed to go "shopping", and she left his condo..

I hope I've made clear enough what it is that I'm trying to explain about what I believe to be one of the most important details of the case and what in the hell could possibly be the motive for having Lauren Erickson go public with such direct and bold contradiction of that extremely important detail..
Would love to hear what is others opinion on this strange development?!?!!!
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Staff online

Members online

Online statistics

Members online
141
Guests online
3,446
Total visitors
3,587

Forum statistics

Threads
632,627
Messages
18,629,326
Members
243,225
Latest member
2co
Back
Top