FL FL - Michelle Parker, 33, Orlando, 17 Nov 2011 - # 9

[JadedGrace]

Ok, looked up all the felony cases filed today. As you can see from this screencap of the section where this should be, there is a big gap. It skips from -016476 to -016496. It could be as simple as information still being entered, but I'm not sure. Also, if they have issued a warrant for an arrest, it will show that warrant in the event section and also show "out for arrest" in the case status area.

Would that indicate that the records were sealed ?

 

[nobodynoz]

Ok, looked up all the felony cases filed today. As you can see from this screencap of the section where this should be, there is a big gap. It skips from -016476 to -016496. It could be as simple as information still being entered, but I'm not sure. Also, if they have issued a warrant for an arrest, it will show that warrant in the event section and also show "out for arrest" in the case status area.

Thank you! Now I'm really curious where 016477 to 016495 are. And if they'll ever be posted.

 

[Tammy N]

The case number should read 2010 as this is when this offense happened. It is odd to have a 2011 case number for something that happened the year before. At least, I have not seen it that way.

Correct - the charges shown inside whatever that was posted - shows charges from 2010 - the Case File No. would not change even if filed at a later date for, say, a probation violation.

I was going to go out on a limb and offer that maybe, just MAYBE, something was filed today on a probable cause to issue a warrant on him - but that doesn't make ANY sense either in that that posting showed specifically 2010 drug charges, which are completely irrelevant to this matter.

I'm new here - surely don't want to rock any boats. But I can't stop thinking that that post was contrived and/or edited for some silly reason ::shrugs:: MOO - but something isn't right about this one.

 

[andalso]

Thanks Tammy. Without an actual link, we can't know that that info ever really existed on line. I'd feel better if eefive were still on here and contributing... May have been a drive-by.

Thank you. Feel the same way.

 

[WannaBePI]

Watching Wesh2 news. They are showing that the phone was found near the Hoffner bridge.

 

[sarah7855]

Would that indicate that the records were sealed ?

I honestly have no idea. Looks like we are going to have to wait and see on this one.

 

[stilettos]

Correct - the charges shown inside whatever that was posted - shows charges from 2010 - the Case File No. would not change even if filed at a later date for, say, a probation violation.

I was going to go out on a limb and offer that maybe, just MAYBE, something was filed today on a probable cause to issue a warrant on him - but that doesn't make ANY sense either in that that posting showed specifically 2010 drug charges, which are completely irrelevant to this matter.

I'm new here - surely don't want to rock any boats. But I can't stop thinking that that post was contrived and/or edited for some silly reason ::shrugs:: MOO - but something isn't right about this one.

If true, that simply sucks.

 

[Angelonline]

Thank you. I don't recall seeing that, but I am willing to look for it.

I used the birth date of 11/24/1947 and nothing came up. There are a few Dale Smith's outside of the Dale, Jr, & Sr.

Here is a link to the mandate from the appeal. The person is Dale Wayne Smith the year is 1984 and the attorney is J. Russell Hornsby (the younger Hornsby is representing the wife now). I am still looking for orginal case I saw it the other day but did not post it due to TOS and not wanting to put out things about someone not named as a suspect, however with your post about no criminal record I did feel the need to correct that post. I saw the orginal post about it in one of the earlier threads and that is what lead me to orginally search for it.

http://or.occompt.com/recorder/eagleweb/downloads/2769283.pdf?id=DOCC2769283.A0&parent=DOCC2769283

 

[sarah7855]

Correct - the charges shown inside whatever that was posted - shows charges from 2010 - the Case File No. would not change even if filed at a later date for, say, a probation violation.

I was going to go out on a limb and offer that maybe, just MAYBE, something was filed today on a probable cause to issue a warrant on him - but that doesn't make ANY sense either in that that posting showed specifically 2010 drug charges, which are completely irrelevant to this matter.

I'm new here - surely don't want to rock any boats. But I can't stop thinking that that post was contrived and/or edited for some silly reason ::shrugs:: MOO - but something isn't right about this one.

You guys are right, if a case was entered into the clerk of courts website in 2010 as that post indicated, it should have a 2010 in the number. 2011 indicates a case filed this year. Even if LE was re-opening a case or just now deciding to go forward with a warrant or something similar, it would still have the 2010 number. Like I said, I've never seen anything like that in my 12+ years experience with the OC clerk system.

...and I just hit 1,000 posts love me some Websleuths!

 

[Patty G]

Here is a link to the mandate from the appeal. The person is Dale Wayne Smith the year is 1984 and the attorney is J. Russell Hornsby (the younger Hornsby is representing the wife now). I am still looking for orginal case I saw it the other day but did not post it due to TOS and not wanting to put out things about someone not named as a suspect, however with your post about no criminal record I did feel the need to correct that post. I saw the orginal post about it in one of the earlier threads and that is what lead me to orginally search for it.

http://or.occompt.com/recorder/eagleweb/downloads/2769283.pdf?id=DOCC2769283.A0&parent=DOCC2769283

Need a birth date so I know which Dale it is.

 

[SuziQ]

What if the offense was in 2010 but charges not file until 2011?

 

[Angelonline]

Need a birth date so I know which Dale it is.

Since Jr would have been 13 I am pretty positive this is Sr. The sentence if IRC was 60 days in jail. Still looking for the file.

 

[TexasLil]

Did you pull that list from "Date Filed" using 5/8/11? I am on the site for "Date Filed" and my numbers all start with: 2011-CF-006

Now I am really confused.

Patty,

Use the date format 12/08/2011

Those are today's cases and all reference 2011-CF-016

 

[my_tee_mouse]

I've read these threads a long time, but never post (sit here and talk to you out loud, but this is my first post). I'm a paralegal by profession and I saw this and decided to go look myself at the Orange County Clerk site. I have to say? When you run that case number that was posted - there is no such case number I see comes up at all. Period. Nor anyone with THAT particular date of birth with the name Dale W Smith, for that matter. something seems extremely hinky about this one. JMHO

RBBM
:rolling::rolling:

AND

:welcome4:

 

[nobodynoz]

If true, that simply sucks.

But it is a very good lesson. Trying to think of the positive. :crazy:

 

[my_tee_mouse]

:great: Another nap......more breaking news! And better yet, I'm sick....I will be napping a lot!!! :woohoo:

Way to take one for the team, closer!!! :rocker::crazy:

(Feel better soon!)

 

[Psychic Sleuth]

After: 5/8/2011 Date Filed On or Before: 5/8/2011 Sort By: Filed Date

December not May!!

Today is 12/8/2011 not 5/8/2011 :innocent:

 

[Faithern]

You are using 5/8/2011, but we are in December

 

[Patty G]

After: 5/8/2011 Date Filed On or Before: 5/8/2011 Sort By: Filed Date

December not May!!

I just realized my mistake everyone. Somehow I went from December back to May.

So sorry, I started in December, but no clue how I ended up back in May ... :blushing:

 

[Psychic Sleuth]

I just realized my mistake everyone. Somehow I went from December back to May.

So sorry, I started in December, but no clue how I ended up back in May ... :blushing:

LOL it's ok, we all do these things once in a while