Identified! FL - Palm Beach Co, near State Rd 703, WhtFem 14-15, UP16314, in woods, Jun'74 - Suzanne Gale Poole

[GatorFL]

Here is another possible match
Rose Ann Hockenson The National Missing and Unidentified Persons System (NamUs)
Date of Last Contact February 14, 1973
Missing From Naranja, Florida (about 2 hour drive to North Palm Beach)
Missing Age 14 Years

I am going to email the Palm Beach PD. It's worth a shot.

Actually, email the Palm Beach Sheriff since this UID was not found in the town of Palm Beach.

 

[iulia]

The NamUs page for this UID is down.

 

[victoriarobinson642]

The NamUs page for this UID is down.

Great to hear!

 

[John/Jane Doe]

Great to hear!

I hope the Singer Island Jane Doe has been identified.

 

[Mysteries1974]

Have you seen this child?

This young lady is still on NCMEC. Although I am aware they tend to be a bit slower in removing solved cases. I hope we get some news on her soon!

 

[ChatteringBirds]

I'm afraid this will be a case of an identity that could have been made sooner but slipped through the cracks of an imperfect system. Sad if so, but at least it was (seemingly) finally possible to make the I.D.

 

[chaddylex]

Wow. I have been wondering for a long time who this Jane Doe is. I turned in Rose Hockenson two weeks ago but I never heard back. (I also turned in Rose as a possible match to the Altamonte Jane Doe) which the detective is thinking it may be her.

 

[Mysteries1974]

Wow. I have been wondering for a long time who this Jane Doe is. I turned in Rose Hockenson two weeks ago but I never heard back. (I also turned in Rose as a possible match to the Altamonte Jane Doe) which the detective is thinking it may be her.

I’m gonna email Carrie Sutherland from NamUs and see if she knows why this girl was removed

 

[chaddylex]

I’m gonna email Carrie Sutherland from NamUs and see if she knows why this girl was removed

Great! I would love to know! Keep us posted!

 

[Mysteries1974]

Great! I would love to know! Keep us posted!

She responded with simply “Thank You!”

 

[chaddylex]

She responded with simply “Thank You!”

Dang, I wish she at least said if she was identified. Thanks for reaching out though.

 

[ChatteringBirds]

She responded with simply “Thank You!”

Hopefully that was an auto-response and you will receive a genuine response soon. (?)

 

[Mysteries1974]

Hopefully that was an auto-response and you will receive a genuine response soon. (?)

I think someone should now contact the law enforcement agency listed for this young lady. I wish she would’ve gone more into depth with her email regarding this Jane Doe.

 

[Diavola]

I think someone should now contact the law enforcement agency listed for this young lady. I wish she would’ve gone more into depth with her email regarding this Jane Doe.

There is another Jane Doe that got her NamUs removed recently that I'd like to know about.

 

[BigKeyManatee]

Thrilled to see the heading on this thread marked as “Resolved.”
Not second guessing or being cheeky, just trying to understand the usual procedures for such tagging.

• Is adding this tag something that only the Mods can do?
• Is there a subtext to the choice of tags used? I’ve seen these used in the Identified Forum: Match!, Resolved, and Identified. Are they used interchangeably?
• Was the Resolved status assumed based on the disappearance of this UID’s NamUs profile, or was there some confirmation from LE?

I understand that neither this community, nor the public at large, is privy to any information that individuals or LE choose not to make public. PBSO may or may not release a press statement for the Singer Island Doe. These remains are all that is left of a precious human life and their dignity and that of their living kin is paramount.

Progress with DNA identification has taken off with unparalleled success. I wonder if, as the frequency increases, the novelty and perhaps the perceived “newsworthiness” of releasing this information will decrease? It’s been hard to keep up of late.
Thanks y’all!

 

[Friday Fan]

Thrilled to see the heading on this thread marked as “Resolved.”
Not second guessing or being cheeky, just trying to understand the usual procedures for such tagging.

• Is adding this tag something that only the Mods can do?
• Is there a subtext to the choice of tags used? I’ve seen these used in the Identified Forum: Match!, Resolved, and Identified. Are they used interchangeably?
• Was the Resolved status assumed based on the disappearance of this UID’s NamUs profile, or was there some confirmation from LE?

I understand that neither this community, nor the public at large, is privy to any information that individuals or LE choose not to make public. PBSO may or may not release a press statement for the Singer Island Doe. These remains are all that is left of a precious human life and their dignity and that of their living kin is paramount.

Progress with DNA identification has taken off with unparalleled success. I wonder if, as the frequency increases, the novelty and perhaps the perceived “newsworthiness” of releasing this information will decrease? It’s been hard to keep up of late.
Thanks y’all!

There are some strange cases, that probably should just be stuck in a "resolved" file (obviously this is not one of them):
Examples:

• Skeletal remains are non-human
• Grave robbers
• Minor committing the crime of grave robbing. (Yes it happens)
• Medical school cadaver mishaps and stunts
• Mix Up (Case that was identified previously but for some reason marked as UID. We had one here dated from 1985)
• Archeological remains previously assumed to be recent
• Cemetery mishaps (A pond was recently dug on a very old cemetery)
• Misplaced remains
• Remains stolen from medical examiners offices decades ago

 

[Melt71]

There is another Jane Doe that got her NamUs removed recently that I'd like to know about.

. I’ve posted the family’s video to the other Doe’s thread and it’s been amended to show her name.

 

[chaddylex]

Thrilled to see the heading on this thread marked as “Resolved.”
Not second guessing or being cheeky, just trying to understand the usual procedures for such tagging.

• Is adding this tag something that only the Mods can do?
• Is there a subtext to the choice of tags used? I’ve seen these used in the Identified Forum: Match!, Resolved, and Identified. Are they used interchangeably?
• Was the Resolved status assumed based on the disappearance of this UID’s NamUs profile, or was there some confirmation from LE?

I understand that neither this community, nor the public at large, is privy to any information that individuals or LE choose not to make public. PBSO may or may not release a press statement for the Singer Island Doe. These remains are all that is left of a precious human life and their dignity and that of their living kin is paramount.

Progress with DNA identification has taken off with unparalleled success. I wonder if, as the frequency increases, the novelty and perhaps the perceived “newsworthiness” of releasing this information will decrease? It’s been hard to keep up of late.
Thanks y’all!

I was wondering the same thing. I have belonged to Websleuths for about 15 years. I believe if other profiles were taking down in NamUs their thread here wasn't always tagged as being "resolved" unless they knew more than what the general public knows. I hope we do find out she was finally identified, even if they don't release her name.

 

[BigKeyManatee]

There are some strange cases, that probably should just be stuck in a "resolved" file (obviously this is not one of them):
Examples:

• Skeletal remains are non-human
• Grave robbers
• Minor committing the crime of grave robbing. (Yes it happens)
• Medical school cadaver mishaps and stunts
• Mix Up (Case that was identified previously but for some reason marked as UID. We had one here dated from 1985)
• Archeological remains previously assumed to be recent
• Cemetery mishaps (A pond was recently dug on a very old cemetery)
• Misplaced remains
• Remains stolen from medical examiners offices decades ago

Thank you! This is so thorough and about 8 more than I could think of!

 

[Friday Fan]

Thank you! This is so thorough and about 8 more than I could think of!

Here's the case of a likely "Mix Up". I think he was likely identified within a year or so after he was killed. I think he was in the Doe Network as Unidentified. His NAMUS did not have LE contact info. I remember trying to figure out if he was Bexar County Sheriff's or San Antonio PD. Obviously this was a homicide.


He still persists as an UID on Texas DPS: unDetails


https://wiki/Bexar_County_John_Doe_(1987) (Can't get link to work, but he's on there)
43UMTX
The National Missing and Unidentified Persons System (NamUs)