Suitcase video is played for the jury.
Every time I see it, it's awful anew.
JMO
Suitcase video is played for the jury.
Every time I see it, it's awful anew.
JMO
If there's appropriate justice and a conviction for JT it's due to SB being so stupid as to video Jorge begging to be let out of the suitcase because he can't breathe.It’s so awful. Every time I see the video or even read about it, I feel like I’m having trouble breathing in sympathetic response and start to panic. I cannot imagine Jorge’s torment and fear.
Incredibly damning for Sarah. The length of time he was in there belies claims of an accident. At best it’s criminally negligent homicide, at worst it’s pre-meditated first-degree murder.
It’s so awful. Every time I see the video or even read about it, I feel like I’m having trouble breathing in sympathetic response and start to panic. I cannot imagine Jorge’s torment and fear.
Incredibly damning for Sarah. The length of time he was in there belies claims of an accident. At best it’s criminally negligent homicide, at worst it’s pre-meditated first-degree murder.
How could that defense work when she had Jorge locked in a suitcase and said there wasn't any fighting going on that day/night?Her defence is no longer that it was an accident. Her defence is now officially self defence / battered spouse syndrome and the explanation that her story has changed after 4.5 years is due to not knowing herself that she had battered spouse syndrome. She is being put on the stand to testify by her lawyer so that she can explain exactly what happened within the 11 minutes between recordings that means she shifted from playing a game to enacting a BSS self-defence intentional killing.
After 4.5 years of vehemently stating there was nothing intentional, this is quite some shift.
Her defence is no longer that it was an accident. Her defence is now officially self defence / battered spouse syndrome and the explanation that her story has changed after 4.5 years is due to not knowing herself that she had battered spouse syndrome. She is being put on the stand to testify by her lawyer so that she can explain exactly what happened within the 11 minutes between recordings that means she shifted from playing a game to enacting a BSS self-defence intentional killing.
After 4.5 years of vehemently stating there was nothing intentional, this is quite some shift.
How could that defense work when she had Jorge locked in a suitcase and said there wasn't any fighting going on that day/night?
She's repeatedly said it was "a good day".
She wasn't in imminent danger for her life.
BBMOwens has said a couple of times that the 11 minutes between videos is what matters, and it's what's key to the case. I'm not understanding his thinking here. What does he think happened during those 11 minutes that makes Sarah innocent?
Owens has said a couple of times that the 11 minutes between videos is what matters, and it's what's key to the case. I'm not understanding his thinking here. What does he think happened during those 11 minutes that makes Sarah innocent?
Her defence is no longer that it was an accident. Her defence is now officially self defence / battered spouse syndrome and the explanation that her story has changed after 4.5 years is due to not knowing herself that she had battered spouse syndrome. She is being put on the stand to testify by her lawyer so that she can explain exactly what happened within the 11 minutes between recordings that means she shifted from playing a game to enacting a BSS self-defence intentional killing.
After 4.5 years of vehemently stating there was nothing intentional, this is quite some shift.
Seems like the defense's strategy boils down to SB's "version" of events and whether or not the jury will find her trustworthy. Now I haven't been keeping up with this trial as much as I want to, so I'm not sure of all that the jury has seen. But, IMO, if they saw any of that interview or the bodycam footage of the cops' initial encounter with her, SB shows herself to be untrustworthy right off the bat.Her defence is no longer that it was an accident. Her defence is now officially self defence / battered spouse syndrome and the explanation that her story has changed after 4.5 years is due to not knowing herself that she had battered spouse syndrome. She is being put on the stand to testify by her lawyer so that she can explain exactly what happened within the 11 minutes between recordings that means she shifted from playing a game to enacting a BSS self-defence intentional killing.
After 4.5 years of vehemently stating there was nothing intentional, this is quite some shift.
How could that defense work when she had Jorge locked in a suitcase and said there wasn't any fighting going on that day/night?
She's repeatedly said it was "a good day".
She wasn't in imminent danger for her life.