GUILTY FL - Sarah Boone, 42, charged with murdering boyfriend Jorge Torres, 42, by leaving him locked in suitcase, Winter Park, Feb 2020 #3

Status
Not open for further replies.
  • #1,261
As she sat there after her lawyer Owens left, I couldn’t help but wonder what was going on in her mind. I didn’t have any idea because I don’t think like she does…thankfully.

My heart goes out to Jorge’s family.
 
  • #1,262
Murder?

1.He got himself drunk that night
2.He put himself in the suitcase
3.He put himself in a position where he was dependent on a woman with known (especially by him) alcohol & emotional issues

A video featuring emotional drunk talk does not prove murderous intent

2 intoxicated people doing stupid intoxicated things
She passes out and he is trapped
Accident

Manslaughter/reckless homicide at best, if the system understands "justice"

May not satisfy a lynchmob but would closer to a just outcome

JMO on our broken system
 
  • #1,263
Manslaughter/reckless homicide at best, if the system understands "justice"

She was offered the maximum sentence for manslaughter as a plea deal and refused it.

 
  • #1,264
Murder?

1.He got himself drunk that night
2.He put himself in the suitcase
3.He put himself in a position where he was dependent on a woman with known (especially by him) alcohol & emotional issues

A video featuring emotional drunk talk does not prove murderous intent

2 intoxicated people doing stupid intoxicated things
She passes out and he is trapped
Accident

Manslaughter/reckless homicide at best, if the system understands "justice"

May not satisfy a lynchmob but would closer to a just outcome

JMO on our broken system

Yes the prosecution did understand justice and agrees with you about charging her with manslaughter. She was offered a 15 year manslaughter charge.

She had her chance to plead to manslaughter but instead chose to go to trial on 2nd degree murder charges.

She did not say she passed out. She hit his fingers with a bat when he was sticking out his fingers to unzip it. Then she deliberately left him alone in the living room and went upstairs to bed like normal. Then, for an hour, deliberately did not even check on him after she woke up.

This is not innocently falling asleep on the couch then waking up in a panic to unzip her boyfriend.

2 Cents
 
Last edited:
  • #1,265
She was offered the maximum sentence for manslaughter as a plea deal and refused it.

So you are agreeing with me, or..

I knew that but just don't get the celebratory glee for someone who sank themselves deeper than the system deemed necessary due to personality defects or failed creative logic. What happened to the facts? The system shouldn't allow you to do that to yourself. She deserves life because she made a dumb decision in the legal process? It's scary that people support that. CourtTV B.S. IMO

Some reform is needed regarding plea deals. They've become so common and usually tank any respectable outcome for victims and their families. This is the flip side. Plea deals are heinous.
 
  • #1,266
Yes the prosecution did understand justice and agrees with you about charging her with manslaughter. She was offered a 15 year manslaughter charge.

She had her chance to plead to manslaughter but instead chose to go to trial on 2nd degree murder charges.

She did not say she passed out. She hit his fingers with a bat when he was sticking out his fingers to unzip it. Then she deliberately left him alone in the living room and went upstairs to bed like normal. Then, for an hour, deliberately did not even check on him after she woke up.

This is not innocently falling asleep on the couch then waking up in a panic to unzip her boyfriend.

2 Cents
I think you're leaving out that they were intoxicated. And you're applying your common sense to their intoxicated event. Alcohol is not the excuse but the explanation for the bad behavior. Murderous intent does not need to be manufactured because hard evidence exists that bad decisions were made in the moment due to alcohol.

Is there other evidence she planned to take advantage of an opportunity and murder him? In a notebook, on her phone, did she speak with others about a plan to kill him?
 
  • #1,267
I think you're leaving out that they were intoxicated. And you're applying your common sense to their intoxicated event. Alcohol is not the excuse but the explanation for the bad behavior. Murderous intent does not need to be manufactured because hard evidence exists that bad decisions were made in the moment due to alcohol.

Is there other evidence she planned to take advantage of an opportunity and murder him? In a notebook, on her phone, did she speak with others about a plan to kill him?

On her phone.

She shows on her phone she knew beyond a reasonable doubt that he couldn't breath and wanted to be let out and she was happy with this.

Drinking takes away inhibitions and can show how you really feel. How she really felt came out that night.

Murderers cannot get away with murder by pleading intoxication. Intoxication is not a free pass in the justice system.

2 Cents
 
  • #1,268
  • #1,269
For what? The kidney of a murderer is special? I call false humility.
Does anyone believe she was really tested?

I think she played her penpal.

JMO
 
  • #1,270
Does anyone believe she was really tested?

I think she played her penpal.

JMO

Agree and I don’t believe she was tested. Everything is to inflate herself as a “good person”.
 
  • #1,271
Murder?

1.He got himself drunk that night
2.He put himself in the suitcase
3.He put himself in a position where he was dependent on a woman with known (especially by him) alcohol & emotional issues

A video featuring emotional drunk talk does not prove murderous intent

2 intoxicated people doing stupid intoxicated things
She passes out and he is trapped
Accident

Manslaughter/reckless homicide at best, if the system understands "justice"

May not satisfy a lynchmob but would closer to a just outcome

JMO on our broken system

Your version would have been a great excuse, however, Sarah Boone nee Paulson explained the court at great length how she intentionally murdered poor JT and for what reason.

I think it is time that Sarah Paulson stopped using her poor ex husband's name since she hates him so much and stop dragging her son into the situation.

Justice has been served.
 
  • #1,272
Does anyone believe she was really tested?

I think she played her penpal.

JMO

Nah, just like she didn't have cancer. She'll play any card that one.
 
  • #1,273
I think you're leaving out that they were intoxicated. And you're applying your common sense to their intoxicated event. Alcohol is not the excuse but the explanation for the bad behavior. Murderous intent does not need to be manufactured because hard evidence exists that bad decisions were made in the moment due to alcohol.

Is there other evidence she planned to take advantage of an opportunity and murder him? In a notebook, on her phone, did she speak with others about a plan to kill him?

With the greatest of respect, catch up!

There's a wealth of information on this thread and on the legal commentator youtubers sites. SB has been on remand for nearly five years in jail and gone through nine different lawyers.

We have debated, discussed, and commented on every aspect of this case for years now. Read up.
 
  • #1,274
Something that came out in court yesterday, during SB's long and tedious forgiveness speech, is that it was definitely JT's brother Mo who attacked him and severely harmed him. The reason for that was SB had been showing him 'all her bruises'. So. Now we know for sure that she caused that attack. An attack which left JT needing facial reconstruction.

There was never a single piece of evidence given in court that JT had harmed SB except in one incident where the police realised he was trying to fend her off and he was also injured - her scratch marks on his neck. Her ex-husband described that same behaviour perpetrated by SB - drunken violent attacks in which he had to fend her off. Those took place before SB ever knew JT. She was always a violent drunk.
 
  • #1,275
Murder?

1.He got himself drunk that night
2.He put himself in the suitcase
3.He put himself in a position where he was dependent on a woman with known (especially by him) alcohol & emotional issues

A video featuring emotional drunk talk does not prove murderous intent

2 intoxicated people doing stupid intoxicated things
She passes out and he is trapped
Accident

Manslaughter/reckless homicide at best, if the system understands "justice"

May not satisfy a lynchmob but would closer to a just outcome

JMO on our broken system
She wasn't so drunk that she couldn't instantly formulate a plan and decide that zipping him in would be an excellent way of keeping him trapped to have to listen to her, and punish him for his previous wrongs against her.

She wasn't so drunk that she couldn't apply logic/reason/memory of his transgressions to why she wanted him in the case and what she wanted to say to him, and actually respond cognitively to him saying he couldn't breathe.

She wasn't so drunk that she couldn't remember she was creating her own library of videos of him, and then film him for over two minutes with a steady hand.

She wasn't so drunk that next day speaking to an officer outside she couldn't remember wanting him to squirm when she zipped him in. In other words pay.


She is responsible for her defense. It wasn't that she was too intoxicated to form intent, it was that she intended to keep him hostage and then lied that she thought he could get himself out. She wouldn't have felt as safe as she did to sit and laugh at him, if she thought he could get out and attack her, right then or when she went to bed.

She left him and went to bed knowing he couldn't breathe - how can we tell that? - because she acknowledged that to him, the danger she had put him in, on film. Yep, you can't breathe and it's for all the times you did this and this.

IMO
 
  • #1,276
So, who is paying for Owens and his huge team and all their expenses now?

It wasn't the state and tax payer.
It isn't SB who is legally indigent.
Is SB allowed to write a book and profit from sales?
Is Owens allowed to write a book about her and profit from sales?
If so, does he have to wait until after her Appeal?
Will Owens be obliged to bankrupt his business if he can't pay large bills and fees he owes to other legal professionals and consultants?

Did Owens act shady taking on the case in the first place knowing his client had no chance of winning and also that he had no payment arrangement?

Did Owens and his contacts and the BSS BSers view this as a test case and do it for free?
 
  • #1,277
Thanks to all who took one for the team and listened to SB’s post-sentencing courtroom speech. Jack Rice’s reaction says it all.

@jackrice
Look up narcissism in the dictionary and Sarah Boone’s face will be there. On
@CourtTV

@CourtTVUK
with @AshleyCourtTVand
@lawyerschiff

IMG_3377.jpeg

 
  • #1,278
  • #1,279
Thanks to all who took one for the team and listened to SB’s post-sentencing courtroom speech. Jack Rice’s reaction says it all.

@jackrice
Look up narcissism in the dictionary and Sarah Boone’s face will be there. On
@CourtTV

@CourtTVUK
with @AshleyCourtTVand
@lawyerschiff

View attachment 548721


I like the closing statement that SB has told her truth and this is the 'cost' of it.
SB's truth is wildly out of kilter with everyone else's but she really doesn't seem to care.
.
 
  • #1,280
Life lol, she could have been out in 10 years if she'd accepted the plea. Classic narcissist, goodbye.
Isn't that crazy?!
Narcissistic through and through.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Staff online

Members online

Online statistics

Members online
125
Guests online
2,776
Total visitors
2,901

Forum statistics

Threads
632,151
Messages
18,622,696
Members
243,034
Latest member
RepresentingTheLBC
Back
Top