- Joined
- May 15, 2010
- Messages
- 20,092
- Reaction score
- 55,571
In the earlier article cited by Ann-Tx, entitled, "John Goodman retrial: Prosecutors, defense spar from the start," I saw the following statement:
"If convicted again, Colbath can impose the same prison term or reduce the years, but it can't go higher."
from: http://www.sun-sentinel.com/local/palm-beach/fl-goodman-retrial-begins-20141011-story.html
I think that is an interesting point. Is this a Florida Statute? I guess it must be. I just find it interesting... Can anyone speak to this? Just curious & wanting to learn something...
Thanks.
ETA: I also noticed the following:
"Colbath has expressed concerns that one or more of the trial witnesses will inadvertently blurt out something about the first trial anyway — that didn't happen Saturday. The jurors, six women and four men, are expected to believe the heir to a Texas air conditioning fortune testified at a prior hearing."
Hmmmm -- that may be the way witnesses and the principals are supposed to refer to prior testimony -- as a hearing. Interesting. They've got to handle it somehow. Is this the way Florida handles all retrials? It could certainly be cumbersome at times, methinks.
"If convicted again, Colbath can impose the same prison term or reduce the years, but it can't go higher."
from: http://www.sun-sentinel.com/local/palm-beach/fl-goodman-retrial-begins-20141011-story.html
I think that is an interesting point. Is this a Florida Statute? I guess it must be. I just find it interesting... Can anyone speak to this? Just curious & wanting to learn something...
Thanks.
ETA: I also noticed the following:
"Colbath has expressed concerns that one or more of the trial witnesses will inadvertently blurt out something about the first trial anyway — that didn't happen Saturday. The jurors, six women and four men, are expected to believe the heir to a Texas air conditioning fortune testified at a prior hearing."
Hmmmm -- that may be the way witnesses and the principals are supposed to refer to prior testimony -- as a hearing. Interesting. They've got to handle it somehow. Is this the way Florida handles all retrials? It could certainly be cumbersome at times, methinks.