My apologies. I thought the introduction of another child's existence came from you to start with. I would not have known of this except for reading your prior posts. My response was not aimed at determining who should have custody either. It was on figuring out if another child was fact or rumor, as you say. Since the issue was raised it is relevant only as to character of a major figure in the case. That is all. I am in no way asking you to discuss particulars as to age. Only to verify.
No apologies needed... Ive just taken some slack for bringing this topic up.. and I want to make sure im quoted correctly if it comes from my posts. I am sure another child is indeed fact. The circumstances of why and where she lives are not.