Florida Bar Allegedly Prepares Case against Baez

[Purple Iris]

^ What Purple Iris said.

:clap:

He does not want to work. Bottom line.

He's ~entitled~ to money he did not earn because he's ....... well, he's Baez the Incredible.

:floorlaugh:

Mrs. Baez may have a different perspective once he's out on his behind.

Thank You Numbers ~
Well, if the woman is smart, she's been keeping some very, very detailed notes and copies of documents if she's been able to get her hands on any; to throw in his face and shut him up.
And, has been keeping them far away, in a very safe place.

I know I would have been had I decided to stick around this long.
She has to know what he is all about, and, sometimes, woman can be just a taad bit sneakier than a man, and, it doesn't take a Law Degree either for alot of them~!!

 

[kaRN]

“I believe your partner is not only a liar but incompetent,” NeJame said to Mason. “I'm going to say this in light of what he said to me -- he made up complete and total fabrications.”

IMO MN is our hero!! http://www.wesh.com/news/24817269/detail.html

 

[Reality Orlando]

FIRST ON ORLANDOSENTINEL.COM
New complaint lodged against Casey attorney Jose Baez

Florida Bar confirms new complaint against Jose Baez

"Baez hung up the phone as soon as a reporter called to ask about the complaint Wednesday.

The new file is the latest professional or ethical issue raised against Baez, Casey Anthony's lead attorney."

I didn't see the link to the Sentinal so please excuse me if this has already been posted:
http://www.orlandosentinel.com/news/os-jose-baez-bar-complaint-20110202,0,6636437.story

 

[CarolinaMoon]

Okay, I went back and did a little homework and I think I have figured out the nature of the bar complaint. If what I found is true, anyone could have filed it because the information is right there in front of our eyes.

August 9, 2010

Defense motion:

http://www.wftv.com/pdf/24581279/detail.html

Baez "hints" that Conway had the ability to take notes and duplicate documents.

11. Additionally, TES counsel acknowledges that he allowed another lawyer, not part of the defense team, to review all of the documents at his leisure. Interestingly enough, that lawyer now represents the parents of the Defendant, who were previously represented by TES counsel, for whatever purposes, primarily related sole to media appearances. There were no issues of privacy raised then; no indications that that lawyer was restricted from having copies or making notes; no indications that that lawyer had to pay cash in advance to look at the files...

The untruthful information in boldface. We know from previous pleadings that Conway was not permitted to take notes or duplicate documents. He just tagged those which mentioned Suburban Drive.

August 16, 2010

Brad Conway resigns based on recent defense filings. (So, this doesn't have to do with the April 5 hearing after all.)

http://www.wesh.com/r/24643120/detail.html

"The defense motion filed on August 9, 2010 contains allegations that are not in fact true. As an officer of the court I cannot stand idly by knowing allegations involving me have been misstated. I am now a witness to an innacurate legal pleading filed in our court system. As such, I cannot continue in good conscience as a legal representative," Conway's letter said.


Conway's resignation letter

http://www.wesh.com/news/24643776/detail.html

I hope this helps.

 

[ThinkTank]

Okay, I went back and did a little homework and I think I have figured out the nature of the bar complaint. If what I found is true, anyone could have filed it because the information is right there in front of our eyes.

August 9, 2010

Defense motion:

http://www.wftv.com/pdf/24581279/detail.html

Baez "hints" that Conway had the ability to take notes and duplicate documents.

11. Additionally, TES counsel acknowledges that he allowed another lawyer, not part of the defense team, to review all of the documents at his leisure. Interestingly enough, that lawyer now represents the parents of the Defendant, who were previously represented by TES counsel, for whatever purposes, primarily related sole to media appearances. There were no issues of privacy raised then; no indications that that lawyer was restricted from having copies or making notes; no indications that that lawyer had to pay cash in advance to look at the files...

The untruthful information in boldface. We know from previous pleadings that Conway was not permitted to take notes or duplicate documents. He just tagged those which mentioned Suburban Drive.

August 16, 2010

Brad Conway resigns based on recent defense filings. (So, this doesn't have to do with the April 5 hearing after all.)

http://www.wesh.com/r/24643120/detail.html

"The defense motion filed on August 9, 2010 contains allegations that are not in fact true. As an officer of the court I cannot stand idly by knowing allegations involving me have been misstated. I am now a witness to an innacurate legal pleading filed in our court system. As such, I cannot continue in good conscience as a legal representative," Conway's letter said.


Conway's resignation letter

http://www.wesh.com/news/24643776/detail.html

I hope this helps.

This recent incident of Conway claiming that Baez lied to the Court is not the first time Conway has said that Baez lied to the Court.
The first time was when Conway resigned over it - Baez lied about the Anthony's waiver of conflict and other things in that regard.
In the latest incident Conway claims that Baez lied to the Court about Conway having information about information in the TES documents that is exculpatory.
IMO Conway should have filed a Bar complaint the first time he had evidence of Baez lying to the Court.

Whoever filed the latest Bar complaint could have filed a complaint regarding the tampering investigation, and not about Conway's accusations of Baez lying to the Court?

The public will not know who filed the latest Bar complaint, or what the complaint is based on, until after the case has been investigated by the Bar, and either closed, or action taken.

 

[CarolinaMoon]

This recent incident of Conway claiming that Baez lied to the Court is not the first time Conway has said that Baez lied to the Court.
The first time was when Conway resigned over it - Baez lied about the Anthony's waiver of conflict and other things in that regard.
In the latest incident Conway claims that Baez lied to the Court about Conway having information about information in the TES documents that is exculpatory.
IMO Conway should have filed a Bar complaint the first time he had evidence of Baez lying to the Court.

Whoever filed the latest Bar complaint could have filed a complaint regarding the tampering investigation, and not about Conway's accusations of Baez lying to the Court?

The public will not know who filed the latest Bar complaint, or what the complaint is based on, until after the case has been investigated by the Bar, and either closed, or action taken.

Absolutely. But for tampering, they have to have tied Baez directly to it. He was trying to use Conway as a middle man and Conway didn't help him.

We know Mort had the document... Laura sent it to him (based on the post-it-note). What we probably won't know for a long time hasn't been revealed since it's an ongoing investigation! I'm patient, but not THAT patient lately! :banghead:

 

[The World According]

http://www.wftv.com/video/18147900/index.html#

The gag order hearing, by request

 

[Horace Finklestein]

This is just my take on it, it will never go to trial...I've been worried about from the get go. Listen to the recorded statement from LE with Kelly S...It was very interesting.

...why wouldn't it go to trial?

 

[A_News_Junkie]

http://www.wftv.com/video/18147900/index.html#

The gag order hearing, by request

:maddening: You scared me -- I thought this was late breaking news - as in a new request! Whewwwwwwwww!

 

[mitzi]

Sending them the correct info would fall on deaf ears (imo).
I really think JB and WESH have some sort of 'understanding'.

Yup! I think Kealing and JB are "tight". Kealing seems to be "tight" also with a certain blogger who likes to soak his chicken with a sauce before grilling it. :innocent:

 

[A_News_Junkie]

Okay, where is TWA when I need her! Could it have been said during the August 21st hearing? This article is dated: April 5, 2010.

"Assistant State Attorney Linda Drane Burdick wants the transcripts for the two-hour hearing on Aug. 21, 2009. She doesn't explain in her one-page request filed Monday why the state seeks the information."


http://articles.orlandosentinel.com..._caylee-anthony-texas-equusearch-defense-team

The day JJ didn't show up.
http://www.wftv.com/video/23056801/index.html
(BTW this is the day the stream was messing up really bad. JB mentioned BC at about 27 min mark, but still have not heard him say that BC had docs in his possession comment. This is interesting to re-listen to.) bedtime: So will have to listen tomorrow unless the night shift finds the part while I dream!)

 

[Leila]

I'm shocked JVM or Nancy Grace haven't covered more about the latest "bombshells" this week.

I'd think the parallel investigation, and Florida Bar investigation into Casey's lead attorney falls short of newsworthy for them? ~shrugs~

Nancy Grace is an attorney and many of her guests are also attorneys, so I suspect that they don't want to be put in a position of making comments on another attorney's ethics or courtroom manners.

 

[A_News_Junkie]

Does anyone know exactly why MJ responded so strong on this day?
[ame="http://websleuths.com/forums/showpost.php?p=5567781&postcount=1"]Websleuths Crime Sleuthing Community - View Single Post - 08.30.10 NeJame Calls Baez 'Liar'[/ame]
Originally posted by: momtective!!!
08.30.10 NeJame Calls Baez 'Liar'
NeJame then told Cheney Mason, another member of the Anthony defense team, that Baez is a liar and incompetent.

“I believe your partner is not only a liar but incompetent,” NeJame said to Mason. “I'm going to say this in light of what he said to me -- he made up complete and total fabrications.”

http://www.wesh.com/r/24817269/detail.html

 

[nums24]

In Conway's transcript, Conway says that Baez represented to the Court that Conway had seen documents, when Conway reviewed the TES files, that would prove that Caylee's body was not there at the remains site on Suburban, and Conway says that is absolutely not true. Conway says he never told Baez anything like that.

http://www.orlandosentinel.com/news/os-jose-baez-bar-complaint-20110202,0,3961011,full.story

excerpts

"On the surface of it, Mr. Baez filed a motion with the court in which he claimed that I had had access to Texas EquuSearch records under circumstances that were untrue," Conway said, "and that I was, let's say, given preferential treatment. That was also untrue."

"On the surface, those statements that he basically swore to in filing this with the court, that was untrue," Conway said.

Conway went on to say that Baez also claimed that Conway had information that would corroborate the defense claim that Caylee's remains were not at the location where they were ultimately found in December 2008 during a brief period when Casey Anthony was out of jail.

"And that was not true," Conway told the investigators."

After torchering myself listening to JB in all the TES Hearings and not find anything, I have concluded that either:

a. We missed something was stated in April 5, 2010 hearing that we missed because of technical problems (but BC was not present) link to watch -
[ame="http://www.websleuths.com/forums/showpost.php?p=5015551&postcount=8"]Websleuths Crime Sleuthing Community - View Single Post - 2010.04.05 - Today's Current News - ***NO DISCUSSIONS HERE PLEASE ***[/ame]


or

b. We missed something at the 7/15/2010 hearing, which started with a conference at the bench: http://www.wftv.com/news/24267000/detail.html

or

c. That something was stated during this in-chambers conference and perhaps with this doc dump new info sparked a memory and MN filed the complaint:

http://www.ninthcircuit.org/news/Hi... Texas Equusearch for Bad Faith 8-19-2010.pdf


These are the motions that reference BC:

Page 5, number 11: http://www.ninthcircuit.org/news/Hi...ication for Subpoena Duces Tecum 8-9-2010.pdf

http://www.ninthcircuit.org/news/Hi...or Rulings By Disqualified Judge 5-6-2010.pdf


The only other thing that stood out to me was this:

Conway told Orange County sheriff's investigators four months ago that Baez lied to Chief Judge Belvin Perry about how Conway had seen evidence showing Caylee's body was not in the woods four months before her remains were found, but Conway told them, "I certainly did not see that, wasn't aware of it."

 

[A_News_Junkie]

Okay, where is TWA when I need her! Could it have been said during the August 21st hearing? This article is dated: April 5, 2010.

"Assistant State Attorney Linda Drane Burdick wants the transcripts for the two-hour hearing on Aug. 21, 2009. She doesn't explain in her one-page request filed Monday why the state seeks the information."


http://articles.orlandosentinel.com..._caylee-anthony-texas-equusearch-defense-team

The day JJ didn't show up.
http://www.wftv.com/video/23056801/index.html
(BTW this is the day the stream was messing up really bad. JB mentioned BC at about 27 min mark, but still have not heard him say that BC had docs in his possession comment. This is interesting to re-listen to.) bedtime: So will have to listen tomorrow unless the night shift finds the part while I dream!)

Couldn't edit (time ran out! LOL) to add this:
part two is here: http://www.wftv.com/video/23057236/index.html
Starts with LDB talking about JB saying that TES was an agent of the state.... so if anyone wants it. Now off to bed with me, I hope! hehe
(This is also where the talk of the illegal recording was first brought up!)

 

[nums24]

Video Report - Casey Attorney Jose Baez Under Investigation


http://www.wesh.com/video/26719774/detail.html

 

[noonie]

Lazy is as lazy does???????????????? LOL NITE ALL

 

[A_News_Junkie]

Could someone please provide me with instructions as to how play the audio file for Brad Conway. This link was given: http://www.filefactory.com/file/b53c...BradConway.wma

But, being the computer challenged person that I am, I don't know what to do when I open it. Is there a player that must be downloaded or what?

Any help will be very much appreciated.

That link was not working for me so go here for link.
[ame="http://www.websleuths.com/forums/showpost.php?p=6083182&postcount=193"]Websleuths Crime Sleuthing Community - View Single Post - List of Motions **NO DISCUSSION HERE PLEASE**[/ame]

Then when Click here to skip to download link shows up - click that.
Then Click download now with filefactory basic.
Type the captcha words.
Click download now with filefactory basic.
Wait 30 seconds. (dream of the guilty verdict!)
Click where it says your download link is at bottom of page.
(an advertisement might play)
Click download with filefactory basic
opening bradConway.wma box will appear --
I said open with Windows media player
click okay
(wait and dream of other charges to be filed after guilty verdict - while it downloads...)
Press play or wait and it will autoplay.

That is how I did it -- good luck!

 

[Sherbie]

Wow. This is GREAT!!!!
:woohoo::woohoo::woohoo::woohoo:

I can't stop dancin! That's TWO Mr. Baez!!!!

I wonder how many complaints in one case gets you into serious trouble? Is it as many licks as it takes to get to the center of a tootsie roll pop?

Methinks that vacation is the LAST ONE Baez is going to have for a long while.

Is it too early to sing that NaNaHeyHeyGoodbye song? LOL

Depending on the age of the "new" Bar complaint, I wonder if his vacation might possibly be timed to coincide with investigative Bar interviews or a hearing.

 

[Sherbie]

imo it can! This man, this con-man, is Casey's appeal in the making. Nothing this man has done for Casey = a competent defense!

Howdy, OLG! :hug:

I am thinking that the one thing he has done right is bringing in other highly qualified co-counsel (which may cancel out his ineptitude since he is one of the team and not her sole defender).

I'm sure she'll claim it on appeal, but with so many other competent attorneys on her case (not to mention all the taxpayer-funded experts, labs, investigation -- the likes of which are probably unprecedented for an indigent defendant in FL), I don't see how she could win a claim of ineffective counsel.

I do believe at some point before the trial begins, it wouldn't be out of the question for the judge to question Casey again about her satisfaction with (and agreement to the methods of) her representation. Considering what the judge knows about JB and his antics, I think he will be proactive and take steps to ensure the inevitable DP "ineffective counsel" appellate issue fails.