Just Jayla
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Apr 19, 2009
- Messages
- 3,222
- Reaction score
- 210
George?
Cindy
George?
KC was not all that broke in the sense that she found a way to steal $400 cash from Amy, write forged checks and later (after the car was towed I'm sure), had approx. $200 in her wallet. She could've saved some or put something together, all-be-it in a criminal manner!
George?
I never thought that it would be abnormal for the skull to have moved around with the influx and outflux of water. However, I think if RK could have been more accurate about what exactly he did to the bag/skull on 12/11, we would know if he was the one that lifted it from its side to an upright position-if it was on its side and if the debris being on the side of the interior of the skull was not from the saline wash and dry period.
While I don't believe he had anything to do with anything other than being a sleuther-who-won't-admit-it...
Why would Casey and TL break the lock off of George's shed to rob 5 gallons of gas? I just can't understand this.
It could be theorized that KC was not ready to leave her car yet because she was worried about evidence of Caylee being in the trunk. In other words, she was scared to leave the car abandoned and had to make sure she got gas for it ASAP.
She may have told TL they would get it from her house instead of borrowing from him because of pride (not wanting to ask him for money), or TL was broke and gas was at $4.00 a gallon then, or she thought going to buy a gas can and gas was more trouble than breaking into the shed which was fairly close by.
I don't think it has anything to do with her wanting the tape from the can, or wanting to burn down the car later, or anything like that...I think she just figured that $10 or so dollars for the can plus gas money was too much in lieu of going to the house. She also may have figured that if she went and bought one small can, TL would expect her to go back to a station and fill up. If she got two cans from her dad, she could argue she had plenty of gas and did not need to go spend non-existent money at a station.
I thought both Vass and Statheropoulos had come up with databases with the chemical compounds found in human decomposition (hence the 41 and 86 numbers). I'm pretty sure I remember someone asking Vass on the stand if he had a database of chemicals that are found in human decomposition, referring to this exact thing. So, if he chooses now, even though he's developed this database, that only 5 are the important ones, how can I see him as credible?
In regards to the trash thing, my post pointed out that the other study that was done, with 6 partitially filled bins in a controlled environment (50 F), less than 50% also tested positive for dimethyl sulfide. Did the researchers attempt to find out why those bins tested positive for that?
Why would Casey and TL break the lock off of George's shed to rob 5 gallons of gas? I just can't understand this.
Why wasn't the detail of all of the phone and computer activity spelled out like above post at the trial? Surely I did not miss all of that, I only missed a few short bits. The amount of activity and the number of calls from Casey trying to reach her parents is pretty astounding. Not sure what conclusions could be drawn but surely it points to something having happened, and Casey, not reaching anyone, deals with it herself.
Also am confused about the contined computer activity 1-3pm when Casey was said to be gone before 1pm by George...?
Yes, you are correct in the 41 & 86 being the total numbers of compounds in each man's database (41=Vass and 86=Dr.S). The credibility of either of the studies has nothing to do with the 5...that's just the number JA used when he excluded found compounds that were not easily explained by other means. I was just commenting on the math in your post because you were using the 5 against the *total* numbers in each database to get to a ratio. You'd have include the excluded compounds as a nominator to do that...
As for the study on the trash bins, I don't think Dr. S. was trying to prove anything, he was just recording results. But the blogger's point, as I read it, was that Dr. Furton used the study as a red herring - there was no trash in a cleaned car trunk when the air samples were taken in this case.
Casey was panicking...she just killed her daughter and wanted mommy and daddy to cover her azzzzz.Why wasn't the detail of all of the phone and computer activity spelled out like above post at the trial? Surely I did not miss all of that, I only missed a few short bits. The amount of activity and the number of calls from Casey trying to reach her parents is pretty astounding. Not sure what conclusions could be drawn but surely it points to something having happened, and Casey, not reaching anyone, deals with it herself.
George says she told him they were not coming home. they were staying WITH the nanny and Cindy already knew this. Why would they automatically think she was calling them to babysit?CA had been keeping Caylee every night except the June 1,7 and 9th KC moved out of her house *June 2nd I think. I do believe KC did have Caylee during the day,My guess is she was trying to arrange for her parents to watch Caylee that night. She'd been staying over at TL's without Caylee. I heard someone on some site say TL told her not to bring Caylee overnights. Does anybody have any confirmation on that?
Does anybody have the internet history for that time to see what sites were visited?
George says she told him they were not coming home. they were staying WITH the nanny and Cindy already knew this. Why would they automatically think she was calling them to babysit?CA had been keeping Caylee every night except the June 1,7 and 9th KC moved out of her house *June 2nd I think. I do believe KC did have Caylee during the day,
* I need to verify that
Actually, now I can see why the state did not want to go into detail about her phone calls on the 16th, as the calls lean toward an accident having happened and the State sure did not want anyone to think that, even if true, IMO...