- Joined
- May 20, 2014
- Messages
- 9,431
- Reaction score
- 35,718
Julian Borger has been speaking to Richard Guthrie, a leading British expert on chemical and biological weapons, who runs the website CBW Events about the comments made by French prime minister Manuel Valls on a possible chemical attack.
This might be seen as a dangerous statement to make, Guthrie said. This sort of statement is often made after any kind of terror attack that causes extreme shock or is seen as a having been on a scale greater than has gone before, he added, giving the examples of the Lod airport massacre in 1972, US embassy bombings in Africa in 1998, and after the September 11 attacks in 2001.
There is a natural human reaction to novel fears, like an attack or recent incident that is more dreadful than previous experience, that bring forward fears of something even greater.
This often takes the form of fears of poison of some kind - humans have an innate inner dread of their surroundings, their air, their food, their water being poisoned.
Raising the spectre of the use of poison weapons whether by spread of chemical agents or the inducing of deliberate disease, while an understandable human reaction, can be counter-productive as it could make those with hostile intent take more of a focus on these sorts of weapons.
Guthrie said that unless there was specific information the French authorities had not released there is no clear evidence that the threat of use by terrorists of biological or chemical weapons is greater today than it was last week.
There has always been a low probability that a group might make an attempt to use such weapons, but the technical challenges are considerable.
Indeed, the scale of the impact and disruption caused by the atrocities in Paris on Friday night make it more likely that terror groups may wish to repeat that sort of attack rather than try something novel and technically challenging.
let's hope he is right!!