"G (Guilty)" vs "NG (Not Guilty)" Where do you stand? #3

Status
Not open for further replies.
MISSING CHILDREN DON'T HAVE THE LUXURY OF WAITING A COUPLE OF WEEKS TO BE FOUND!:banghead:
If they aren't already dead they are being abused,sexually assaulted,possibly tortured.Then they are usually killed.The urgency for LE was heightened because Caylee had already been gone for 31 days.
LE doesn't have to guess.They got their info despite the obstruction of KC ,Cindy,George and Lee.
If someone breaks into your home and assaults you and steals your possesions who are YOU going to call?

Amen Miss James!!!

The 31 days is exactly why there was no Amber Alert issued!!! Seems the A's cannot figure this out for themselves! I'll join you in the :banghead:
 
Bold one: There is no proof of that. That is not a fact.
Bold Two: Not confirmed. Fbi Email says can not confirm human decomp.
Bold Three: Fbi report said fabric didn't match. Consistent with coming from a different source.
Bold four: I would expect things from her home to be there. She did live there of course.
Bold Five: They don't know who performed that search if indeed the search happened.
This is another reason why I lean not guilty. There are many false reports out there.

Per your bold one I offer up the Forensic Entomology Report that was released 11/06/09. It clearly states on page 1 and page 7 that there are coffin flies because of the decomp in the trunk, in the trash bag and on the napkins/paper towels. So that has been proven already.
 
Are you saying that he would in some way not be honest because of his wife being a member of the defense? I really do not understand the purpose of this post.

(smile)

I suspect Dr. Baden has watched the long ago movie, Adam's Rib, starring Katherine Hepburn and Spencer Tracy. They played attorneys who were married to one another and ended up opposing each other in a murder trial -- wife shot cheating husband. It's a classic.

Oh, and it certainly didn't do anything for his love life or their marriage.

(chuckle)
 
I'll bite..............there has been previous speculation and discussion about "A family code". I wonder what the reason for "riddles" would be. Is it your opinion that KC and / or members of the A family attempted to offer info via "code"? Is there an example you could offer for consideration? I am truly intrigued.

No, Sorry. I know nothing of any c o d e . I was responding to a snarky post. I am sorry, I should not do that.

I have thought of something interesting tho, but don't know where to post it.
 
Not only that...as I have stated previously, when it comes time for trial, we will also being hearing from expert witnesses to discuss and opinion the various reports, lab findings, etc that we are seeing now (with no explanation) and in which we are trying to speculate what they reflect.

The evidence we HAVE seen will be much more clear and understandable when explained by a person deemed as an "expert" in that particular field.

I am looking forward to the SA extracting the information they need from the experts. I also think the cross examination of these experts will be very interesting.
 
Oh please- perhaps they could just beat it out of her. This barbaric mentality does not produce results.

Obviously in this case they are not in the business of solving riddles.
Maybe Casey could have given them her codebook?
 
Thank you for this comment. I agree that Fbi appears to be impartial. I found it interesting that the shorts were 100 percent cotton and still in tact.

I wonder if this has to do with water submersion, and you just took my brain somewhere (watch out when that happens)....Caylee's body had been scattered, but IIRC, the portion of her body with the shorts appears to have been dragged from the upper portion of her body while there was still soft tissue, and was maybe still in the shorts...Correct me if I am wrong there, and I will go back to the original docs to find out why I thought that...

Anyway, if her torse was submerged but her lower portion was not submerged, due to being dragged away from the "ditch", perhaps water broke down the cotton in her shirt faster than the shorts would have decomposed in the air...

Which could also mean that Caylee had been dismembered by animals when the area was dry and the shorts stayed dry...which would peg the time that Caylee's body was there to before August 18-19th, before Fay.

My brain just let out a little puff of smoke, gotta take a breather...Make any sense?
 
Bold one: There is no proof of that. That is not a fact.
Bold Two: Not confirmed. Fbi Email says can not confirm human decomp.
Bold Three: Fbi report said fabric didn't match. Consistent with coming from a different source.
Bold four: I would expect things from her home to be there. She did live there of course.
Bold Five: They don't know who performed that search if indeed the search happened.
This is another reason why I lean not guilty. There are many false reports out there.

We know, we know.....Junk Science! Or is it Junque Science? :waitasec:
 
Join the Police then, and try to interview sociopaths like Casey in a touchy feely way if you want when a child is missing and see how far it gets you.
Y Melich had already been told by Cindy that Casey was lying about everything, was out of control and needed to be in jail. He was soon to find out what a liar she was first hand. As Mark Klaas says there is NO punishment severe enough for these sadistic bullies like Casey, these murderers of helpless little children. I think they showed saintly restraint in dealing with this woman. She deserves everything that comes her way- she will get it the old fashioned way, she earned it.

I am just curious and I will admit that I don't know. Do you know if they did diagnose her as an sociopath? I did hear that the Judge had ordered an examination. It is my understanding that it can only be diagnosed by a professional and that professional has to interview that person.

The other term was pathological liar. Was that diagnosed?
See? this is where I am not that smart.

Ps, I do not have any respect for Mark Klaas what so ever.
 
Thank you. However, at this time, I'm not interested in what changes are proposed or underway in the penalty phase. I'm interested in what statute contains your alleged lesser charge 'requirement' (as discussed in prior posts).
I think this was meant for the thread...not just you.
 
As I recall, CA and GA asked the tough questions in a kind manner, "What have you done?" "Sweetheart, I don't know your involvement..."

And that got them how much closer to any truth????????????

I guess after the second quote I get your point.

You must believe in this interrogation tactic in this situation. I just Don't and that is my opinion.
 
I am just curious and I will admit that I don't know. Do you know if they did diagnose her as an sociopath? I did hear that the Judge had ordered an examination. It is my understanding that it can only be diagnosed by a professional and that professional has to interview that person.

The other term was pathological liar. Was that diagnosed?
See? this is where I am not that smart.

Ps, I do not have any respect for Mark Klaas what so ever.
Highly inflammatory.

PS- didn't you say that she couldn't remember what happened because she is a "pathological liar"?
 
Bold one: There is no proof of that. That is not a fact.
Bold Two: Not confirmed. Fbi Email says can not confirm human decomp.
Bold Three: Fbi report said fabric didn't match. Consistent with coming from a different source.
Bold four: I would expect things from her home to be there. She did live there of course.
Bold Five: They don't know who performed that search if indeed the search happened.
This is another reason why I lean not guilty. There are many false reports out there.

NTS I respect your opinion about innocence. However, I would give your posts alot more credence if they were not so blatantly incorrect and false or if you gave links to that information.
 
I am just curious and I will admit that I don't know. Do you know if they did diagnose her as an sociopath? I did hear that the Judge had ordered an examination. It is my understanding that it can only be diagnosed by a professional and that professional has to interview that person.

The other term was pathological liar. Was that diagnosed?
See? this is where I am not that smart.

Ps, I do not have any respect for Mark Klaas what so ever.

bbm

:shocked2::shocked2::shocked2::furious:
 
I am just curious and I will admit that I don't know. Do you know if they did diagnose her as an sociopath? I did hear that the Judge had ordered an examination. It is my understanding that it can only be diagnosed by a professional and that professional has to interview that person.
The other term was pathological liar. Was that diagnosed?
See? this is where I am not that smart.

Ps, I do not have any respect for Mark Klaas what so ever.


It is my understanding that the judge actually ordered two psych exams when KC was first released, and no, we have not seen any results of that testing, nor do I expect that we will.

No respect for Mark Klaas "whatsoever"? Does this mean that any "bad" he does (in your own opinion) greatly outweighs any "good" he has done in utilizing his personal tragedy towards the prevention of missing and exploited children?
 
Couple good cotton tidbits here, and I am trying to stay on topic by applying this directly to the time that Caylee's body was there, which will help us to understand the primary question-Did KC have the opportunity to place Caylee there? And would the duct tape fibers have degraded in the water faster than the shorts degraded some distance away?

http://www.swicofil.com/products/001cotton.html

There are more links on this that make my head spin a little, but it seems acidic, stagnant water and fungus all have their effects on cotton. Caylee's body was located by a tree covered in fungus IIRC.
 
I am just curious and I will admit that I don't know. Do you know if they did diagnose her as an sociopath? I did hear that the Judge had ordered an examination. It is my understanding that it can only be diagnosed by a professional and that professional has to interview that person.

The other term was pathological liar. Was that diagnosed?
See? this is where I am not that smart.

Ps, I do not have any respect for Mark Klaas what so ever.

Her own mother diagnosed her as a Sociopath.. that's enough for me!
 
I am just curious and I will admit that I don't know. Do you know if they did diagnose her as an sociopath? I did hear that the Judge had ordered an examination. It is my understanding that it can only be diagnosed by a professional and that professional has to interview that person.

The other term was pathological liar. Was that diagnosed?
See? this is where I am not that smart.

Ps, I do not have any respect for Mark Klaas what so ever.

Why no respect for Mark Klaas? :waitasec: Because he took his daughter's tragedy and turned it into something productive? Just curious why you have no respect for him? Oh wait, I think I've got it now.....he has stated on national tv that he believes KC is GUILTY, GUILTY, GUILTY!!!
 
I guess after the second quote I get your point.

You must believe in this interrogation tactic in this situation. I just Don't and that is my opinion.


Just curious...when you were growing up, did you ever play the game "Clue"?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Staff online

Members online

Online statistics

Members online
284
Guests online
775
Total visitors
1,059

Forum statistics

Threads
625,909
Messages
18,513,484
Members
240,882
Latest member
neurotic_cat
Back
Top