I’ve been reading
Sexual Homicide: Patterns & Motives by Robert Ressler, Ann Burgess, and John Douglas. There’s a (somewhat) similar crime discussed in the book — it was interesting to see how the case was investigated and just thought I’d share.
*** WARNING: graphic details ***
Victim (found deceased on the rooftop of an apartment building in Chicago):
- beaten about the face and strangled with the strap of her purse
- nipples cut off after death and placed on her chest
- “You can’t stop me.” was scrawled in ink on the inside of thigh
- “F*** you” was scrawled on abdomen
- a pendant in the form of a Jewish sign (Chai), which she usually wore as a good luck piece around her neck, was missing and presumed taken by the murderer
- earrings were placed symmetrically on either side of her head
- jaw and nose broken and molars loosened
- multiple face fractures caused by a blunt force
- postmortem bite marks visible on thighs, as well as contusions, hemorrhages, and lacerations of the body
COD: strangulation (first manual, then ligature, with the strap of her purse)
“The fact that the murderer used a weapon of opportunity indicated that he did not prepare to commit this crime. He probably used his fist to render her unconscious, which may be the reason no one heard any screams.”
“This crime’s style is a single homicide with the murderer’s primary intent making it a sexually motivated type of crime. There was a degree of planning indicated by the organization and sophistication of the crime scene. The idea of murder had probably occupied the killer for a long period of time. The sexual fantasies may have started through the use and collecting of sadistic 









depicting torture and violent sexual acts.”
“The crime was considered very high risk for the offender. He committed the crime in broad daylight, and there was a possibility that other people might see him. It appeared that the victim happened to cross the path of the offender. The location of the crime suggested the offender felt comfortable in the area. He had been here before, and he felt that no one would interrupt the murder.”
“The crime scene indicated that the murder was one event, not one of a series of events. It also appeared to be a first-time killing, and the subject was not a typical organized offender. There were elements of both disorganization and organization; the offender might fall into a mixed category.”
“The crime scene was not staged. Sadistic ritualistic fantasy generated the sexual motivation for murder. He placed the victim in a degrading posture, which reflected his lack of remorse about the killing. The crime scene portrayed the intricacies of a long-standing murderous fantasy. The positioning of the victim suggested that the offender was acting out something he had seen before, perhaps in a fantasy or in a sadomasochistic pornographic magazine.”
“He positioned her earrings in a ritualistic manner, and he wrote on her body. This reflects some sort of imagery that he probably had repeated over and over in his mind. He took her necklace as a souvenir, perhaps to carry around in his pocket. The investigative profilers also noted that the body was positioned in the form of the woman’s missing Jewish symbol.”
“The sexual acts showed controlled aggression, but rage or hatred of women was obviously present. Although the offender might have preferred his victim conscious, he had to render her unconscious because he did not want to get caught. He did not want the woman screaming for help. The murderer’s infliction of sexual, sadistic acts on an inanimate body suggests that he was disorganized. He probably would be a very confused person, possibly with previous mental problems. The fact that he inflicted acts on a dead or unconscious person indicated his inability to function with a live or conscious person. The crime scene reflected that the killer felt justified in his actions and that he felt no remorse. He was not subtle. He left the victim in a provocative, humiliating position, exactly the way he wanted her to be found. He challenged the police in the message he wrote on the victim; the messages also indicated that the subject might well kill again.”
“The crime received intense coverage by the local media because it was such an extraordinary homicide. The local police responded to a radio call of a homicide. They in turn notified the detective bureau, which notified the forensic crime scene unit, medical examiner’s office, and the county district attorney’s office. A task force was immediately assembled of approximately twenty-six detectives and supervisors. An intensive investigation resulted, which included speaking to and interviewing more than two thousand people. Records checks of known sex offenders in the area proved fruitless. Handwriting samples were taken of possible suspects to compare to the writing on the body. Mental hospitals in the area were checked for people who might fit the profile of this type of killer.”
The FBI’s Behavorial Science Unit was contacted in order to draw up a profile. The outcome of the investigation was the apprehension of a suspect
thirteen months after the discovery of the victim’s body.