IMO, this case is almost impossible to discuss, because those who believe it murder must also believe in an elaborate and wide-ranging conspiracy theory, of which there has been absolutely no evidence. I find it to be bordering on LE bashing. No, I take that back. It's LE bashing, teacher/school bashing, student bashing (as this could not have been committed by one person), coroner bashing, and more. And most of the evidence that does exist/is known, is ignored or dismissed. That's why we've never seen any sort of theory of the murder which can fit within the known facts. The autopsy performed by a rent-a-pathologist that was paid by a lawyer (who clearly intends on launching a lawsuit) is taken as better evidence than that of the coroner.
So very frustrating.
I can't state unequivocally that I believe it was murder. I simply don't know.
I do know, though, that there are many aspects of the official theory of KJ's death that don't make sense to me. I've already mentioned them numerous times so I won't repeat them.
Here is my theory of a murder--no, manslaughter--that I believe fits within the known facts and completely disregards the second autopsy.
KJ enters the gym and encounters the students who school officials acknowledge were in the gym at the time. Some sort of altercation ensues, resulting in the bruising on KJ's face noted by the EMTs. A stunned but still alive KJ is stuffed into the mat--most likely not to kill him, but to teach him a lesson or humiliate him--where he dies of positional asphyxia per the autopsy report.
Such an altercation could easily take place within the 10-minute timeframe between KJ entering the gym and the next class coming in, and a few punches thrown would not result in the perpetrators being noticeably covered in blood, either.
Nor does it require those students lying in wait for KJ. It could have simply been a chance encounter.
I'm not much of a conspiracy theorist, either. But if it is true what the local poster said upthread, the sheriff had determined within two hours or so of the body being found that it wasn't a result of foul play. That being the case, no conspiracy is required--a lackadaisical investigation that doesn't dig very deep will most certainly not uncover foul play, especially if no foul play is a foregone conclusion already.
Finally, I don't think questioning the actions and statements of a law enforcement official who admits to violating the law requiring prompt notification of the coroner is LE bashing. With that one action he's already damaged his credibility in my eyes and subjected his actions and statements to greater scrutiny than if he hadn't.
What evidence am I ignoring or dismissing? This is not meant sarcastically--we all have blind spots.