From link posted way earlier upthread:
"...why would he try to reach all the way down into a mat to grab his shoes? The mat was about 6 feet tall; there was no way he could expect his arms to reach the bottom. And even if he did reach into the mat, how could he have fallen in? The center hole in the top of the rolled mat was 14¼ inches in diameter, according to the incident report, but the coroner measured Johnson's shoulders as 19 inches across. He couldn't even fit into the mouth of the hole, they believe, much less fall all the way to the bottom.
And what about all the other people who used the gym that day? Could no one see him? If Kendrick fell in arms first and hit the bottom of the mat, the Johnsons ask, wouldn't his legs have been sticking in the air? The Daily Times reported that the mats were 7 feet tall. At that height, they would have been tall enough to fully conceal Kendrick's body. But the incident report says the mats were only 6 feet 2 inches, and after Kendrick's death the Johnsons took photos of Kenneth standing next to the upright mats, all of which make them appear to be about 6 feet in height. Kendrick was 5-foot-10. The Johnsons argue that if he'd fallen in with his arms stretched out in front of him, then at least part of his legs would have remained sticking out.
...
One of the photographs included in the investigative report raises another question about Kendrick's death. It shows Kendrick's other pair of shoes, orange-and-white Nikes, in the mat with Kendrick, only they're not at the bottom of the mat where Kendrick would have been reaching. Instead, the Nikes are almost on top of him, lodged between Kendrick's lower body and the inside of the mat. If Kendrick was reaching into the mat when he fell, then how, the Johnsons ask, did a pair of shoes end up falling in after him?"
http://www.grantland.com/story/_/id...-17-year-old-football-player-valdosta-georgia