OnTHEotherHAND...
New Member
- Joined
- Apr 19, 2007
- Messages
- 58
- Reaction score
- 0
Ok. I did get a little carried away with that last post. Frankly I was curious. Curious to see what kind of reaction there might be to the tactic of torture as a means of cracking the... :silenced: silent X
I know that hiring the job done would not be that difficult. Its a matter of knowing where to look But, if I were being played a fool by an individual, who I had reason to believe had killed and stashed my daughter, it would be me and him.
Just me and him. Alone.
Back to the present. The most frustrating thing to me as I have followed this case from day one, has been trying to speculate and fill in the missing pieces without accurate, admissible clues.
As an uninformed public audience, we are still on square one with LE on square 101. Thousands of man hours have gone into interviewing, searching, asking, time-lining, re-interviewing, re-searching, brainstorming, digging, etc. And, by some of the best in the business. Without a doubt, the investigators on this case have enough information to have solved this mystery by now.
Of course, solving and proving are two different deals and proving in court vs. a top notch defense attorney is still another
Even still, I fail to see how solving and/or prosecution of this case would be compromised by allowing public access to the facts. What is it that I do not understand here?
rd. Please help me out here if you would. Why is a SILENT LE critical to cracking the SILENT X? I just dont get it.
otoh
I know that hiring the job done would not be that difficult. Its a matter of knowing where to look But, if I were being played a fool by an individual, who I had reason to believe had killed and stashed my daughter, it would be me and him.
Just me and him. Alone.
Back to the present. The most frustrating thing to me as I have followed this case from day one, has been trying to speculate and fill in the missing pieces without accurate, admissible clues.
As an uninformed public audience, we are still on square one with LE on square 101. Thousands of man hours have gone into interviewing, searching, asking, time-lining, re-interviewing, re-searching, brainstorming, digging, etc. And, by some of the best in the business. Without a doubt, the investigators on this case have enough information to have solved this mystery by now.
Of course, solving and proving are two different deals and proving in court vs. a top notch defense attorney is still another
Even still, I fail to see how solving and/or prosecution of this case would be compromised by allowing public access to the facts. What is it that I do not understand here?
rd. Please help me out here if you would. Why is a SILENT LE critical to cracking the SILENT X? I just dont get it.
otoh