I believe she was found with the top half of her body fully exposed, but had left the house in a jacket, so the defense may try to argue she removed some of those layers herself during her run.In their opening statement, the defense casually said it was just a circumstantial case, which it clearly isn’t.
I thought it was strange that the only cross examination in the three hours I saw, was to of one of her roommates. Following up on a question the prosecution asked about the clothes Laken wore running, the defense wanted to know if she ever took off layers of her clothes when she was running, specifically, “the layer between her bra and her jacket”…..her shirt. Why would they ask that!? Are they going for a blame the victim defense in some way? I certainly hope not!
Some people do run in just a sports bra - I don't think that what happened here in the middle of winter, but I don't see the clothing discussion as victim blaming, it's important on both sides given how she was found.
At least the defense was not asking lots of inane/painful questions to her strong and brave roommates like we have seen in other trials. So impressed at how poised the three of them were up on the stand.