General theory thread and motives rehashed #3

Status
Not open for further replies.
OK, picking up where we left off, Crystal fired off a letter to the Honorable R. Mitchell Prugh the day after his ruling was recorded in Putnam County. I’m not completely sure of how she actually found out about this travesty, but find out she certainly did.

To anyone who says Crystal Sheffield didn’t fight for her children, please read this letter.

How did Crystal find out so soon? Logic tells me Ron called her as soon as he got what he wanted from the judge....called her and gloated. That's JMO and I'm sticking to it.
 
Just proves how vindictive RC and TN are. TN helped RC fill out the statement. They used an address they knew without a doubt it was not Crystal's. I am no lawyer but how is that not fraud? But, of course they weren't even considering the children's feelings in not being able to see their mother. This is too infuriating.
I agree. All of this lying was deliberate fraud and Ronald Cummings should be held accountable...even if CS doesn't file a complaint, the courts should do it on Haleigh's behalf. He should be charged with fraud, contempt of court, filing false reports, and anything else illegal he did. I don't care if he doesn't serve a day really, well, I think he should, but I think his permanent record should show what he did. If this court just ignores what he did, what does that say? MOO.
 
Ron signed a petition that contains a blurb at the end stating he was swearing under oath to the truthfulness of the claims made in said petition.

Ronald Cummings lied under oath.

If the Statute of Limitations has not passed on this offense, he could and should be charged. I would not mind one bit seeing a few more years added to his current sentence.

Ron's lies have devastated Crystal and her family many times over, allowed him custody of children that IMO he should never have been allowed around unsupervised, then derailed the investigation into the disappearance of his daughter.

I cannot say what I really think of this [unsusual person] because of TOS.
 
Ron signed a petition that contains a blurb at the end stating he was swearing under oath to the truthfulness of the claims made in said petition.

Ronald Cummings lied under oath.

If the Statute of Limitations has not passed on this offense, he could and should be charged. I would not mind one bit seeing a few more years added to his current sentence.

Ron's lies have devastated Crystal and her family many times over, allowed him custody of children that IMO he should never have been allowed around unsupervised, then derailed the investigation into the disappearance of his daughter.

I cannot say what I really think of this [unsusual person] because of TOS.
In the statement when the Arrowbrook address is used, TN name is typed in at the bottom as a non-lawyer helping RC fill out the statement. I didn't see that on other doc's, but would TN also be under oath also as someone helping fill out the info?
 
I agree. All of this lying was deliberate fraud and Ronald Cummings should be held accountable...even if CS doesn't file a complaint, the courts should do it on Haleigh's behalf. He should be charged with fraud, contempt of court, filing false reports, and anything else illegal he did. I don't care if he doesn't serve a day really, well, I think he should, but I think his permanent record should show what he did. If this court just ignores what he did, what does that say? MOO.

History shows that Law Enforcement, State Attorney General and the Court system have consistently ignored or refused to act on a lot of illegal things that Ronald Cummings has done.
 
In the statement when the Arrowbrook address is used, TN name is typed in at the bottom as a non-lawyer helping RC fill out the statement. I didn't see that on other doc's, but would TN also be under oath also as someone helping fill out the info?

I can't answer that but it is a very good question.
 
History shows that Law Enforcement, State Attorney General and the Court system have consistently ignored or refused to act on a lot of illegal things that Ronald Cummings has done.

They should have put him away for 25 years when they had the chance. I do not even hesitate to say that any info Ron gave authorities as part of his plea deal were probably lies. And that nothing will be done about it.
 
History shows that Law Enforcement, State Attorney General and the Court system have consistently ignored or refused to act on a lot of illegal things that Ronald Cummings has done.
well, he's locked up for 15 years, so that's a start. Now that he is actually in the pen his record is tarnished and it's usually easier to go after a convict or ex convict. Maybe that's not right, but it's one of the benefits a criminal loses...the assumption of being an honest, upstanding person. MOO
 
It is unbelievable how these documents but into perspective who is ultimately responsible for Haleigh not being here now. It is RC who either directly or indirectly caused harm to this child. Shame on the judge, shame on RC, shame on the rest , who supported this sham of misrepresentation
 
:furious: It's time for a drink.

2 glasses of wine already. My lights went off earlier (someone hit a transformer). I was able to find my candles, cheese and crackers, Jazz CD's and wine, and went to my patio. Haven't done that in a long time. Nice........
Gnarly Head Old Vine Zin...um um
 
Concerned Pap:


:yourock:


I have been preaching that this is what happened for two years. I have attempted to respond to every single person who spoke against Crystal Sheffield and her not wanting or caring about her chldren. I have called the Court in Putnam County for a long time but citizens of PC are the ones who can change the Judge, not an outsider.

I would like to personally thank Papa for proving everything I have been saying for X2 years is true. Papa is a true Hero. I assumed almost every point I've been making by reading between the lines of the paperwork that was available online. It was removed and now I am SO glad we have Papa to lead the way. And lead the way he has. I feel redeemed.

Shout Out to Papa
:woohoo:
 
These documents made me make a connection. In an early news report, Misty was referred to as Ron's cousin. Well, HS is Ron's cousin...and she was arrested too. Since one of the documents said Ron's aunt was going to help out, I wonder where HS was living at the time or if she ever stayed with Misty while Ron was at work. I guess what I was thinking, is maybe the reporter didn't really get the family relation wrong. MOO.
 
On October 26, 2005, EIGHT DAYS after he was arrested for drug violations in Sarasota County, FL, Mr. Cummings filed a motion to set a hearing for custody of the children. On the same day, he filed a motion for default against Crystal claiming she had not responded to his petition filed on 9/16/2005, when in fact, Crystal had filed the pro se response letter which I posted last night and it was received and recorded on 10/18/2005.

By coincidence, Crystal’s response was filed and recorded THE SAME DAY RONALD CUMMINGS WAS ARRESTED in Sarasota County!

Mr. Cummings was attempting to obtain a judgment by default and gain custody of the children less than a week after he bonded out of jail on his newest drug charges! He was trying to get the children before he even knew if he was going to remain a free man or go to prison as he allegedly told Crystal!

Be sure you notice the address for Crystal given by Mr. Cummings on these actions.

I thank you for posting the documents, Papa. You like facts, most if not all your posts are based on facts, I like facts so I just wanted to point out the fact Ron was arrested in Sarasota Co. on Sept. 26, 2005, not on
Oct. 18, 2005 as stated in the above post which makes some of the allegations against RC not true. I don't like to see allegations posted against anyone, no matter who it is, that are false. In no way do I think this was done intentionally, honest mistake, we all make them, I just like to set the record straight if I can.

Oct. 18 is when the charges were dropped/abandoned. I posted the docket and bolded the arrest date below.
(this is one of those dockets one must read from the bottom up!)


Criminal Case Details

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Defendant Name: CUMMINGS RONALD L
Date of Birth: 10/29/1983
Case Number: 2005 CF 017999 NC
Uniform Case Number: 582005CF0179990001NC
Clerk Filing Date: 9/29/2005
Defense Attorney: PUBLIC DEFENDER
Judge:


Scheduled Court Appearance(s):
Date Time Location Description


Charges:
Statute Code General Offense Character Statute Description Disposition Date Disposition
893.13(6A) Principal DRUGS POSSESS-CONTROLLED SUBSTANCE WITHOUT PRESCRIPTION 10/18/2005 Dropped/Abandoned
893.13(6A) Principal DRUGS POSSESS-CONTROLLED SUBSTANCE WITHOUT PRESCRIPTION 10/18/2005 Dropped/Abandoned
893.147(1) Principal NARCOTIC EQUIP POSSESS-AND OR USE 10/18/2005 Dropped/Abandoned
741.31 Principal VIOL INJUNCTION PROTECTION DOMESTIC VIOLENCE 10/18/2005 Dropped/Abandoned
499.03 Principal DRUGS-POSSESS NEW LEGEND DRUG WO PRESCRIPTION 10/18/2005 Dropped/Abandoned


Docket Information:
Date Description Pages Image
10/27/2005 COURT EVENT CANCELLED The following event: CRIMINAL - ARRAIGNMENT FELONY scheduled for 11/04/2005 at 9:00 am has been resulted as follows: Result: CANCELLED (Criminal) 0 None
10/27/2005 Payment of Court Cost 0 None
10/19/2005 ARREST BOND RECORD CREATED Ref: Bond/Pwr No.: 2005AA079210 Initial Charge #: 1 Initial Action Code: POSSESSION OF A CONTROLLED SUBSTANCE(MORPHINE) Prosecutor Count #: 1 Prosecutor Action Code: POSSESSION OF A CONTROLLED SUBSTANCE(MORPHINE) Bonding Co.: AA LARAZA BAIL BONDS Bond Amount: $5000 The following field(s) on arrest bond 1 have been modified: New Bond Status Added: BOND RELEASED New Bond Status Date Added: 10/18/2005 0 None
10/18/2005 NOTICE OF CASE DISPOSITION/ACTION-DECLINED 1 Image
10/5/2005 ARREST BOND RECORD CREATED Arrest Bond Added to Case with: Arrest Date: 09/26/2005 Initial Charge #: 1 Initial Action Code: POSSESSION OF A CONTROLLED SUBSTANCE(MORPHINE) Prosecutor Count #: Prosecutor Action Code: Custody Location: Bond Status: Posted Status Date: 09/28/2005 Bond Type: Surety Bond/Pwr No.: 2005AA079210 Bond Amount: $5000 Bonding Co.: AA LARAZA BAIL BONDS Cash Depositor: 0 None
10/3/2005 Court Event Set Event: CRIMINAL - ARRAIGNMENT FELONY Date: 11/04/2005 Time: 9:00 am Judge: ROBERTS, CHARLES E Location: Courtroom 3-A Result: CANCELLED (Criminal) 0 None
9/29/2005 ADVISORY HEARING BOND 2 Image
9/29/2005 COPY OF DRIVERS LICENSE 1 Image
9/29/2005 EVIDENCE / PROPERTY RECEIPT 10 Image
9/29/2005 REPORT 2 Image
9/29/2005 PROBABLE CAUSE AFFIDAVIT (FHPF05OFF062270) 17 Image
9/29/2005 NOTICE TO APPEAR - CRIMINAL 1 Image
9/28/2005 INVOCATION OF CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS 1 Image
9/28/2005 INDIGENCY CIRCUIT CASE APPROVED Receipt: 422546 Date: 10/27/ 1 Image
9/28/2005 BOND - PAPER POWER # 2005-AA-07 3 Image
9/28/2005 DECISION TO DECLINE TO APPLY FOR THE SERVICES OF THE PUBLIC DEFENDER 1 Image

http://courtweb.co.sarasota.fl.us/crimapp/crimdetail.asp?case_id=44204608

I have always wanted to read the documents on this case, esp. the probable cause affadavit and the evidence/property receipt.
 
well, he's locked up for 15 years, so that's a start. Now that he is actually in the pen his record is tarnished and it's usually easier to go after a convict or ex convict. Maybe that's not right, but it's one of the benefits a criminal loses...the assumption of being an honest, upstanding person. MOO

locked up for 15 yrs... maybe...

Drug Offenders, Non-Violent Criminals Could Get Less Prison Time with Proposed Bill that Loosens Mandatory Minimums

JACKSONVILLE, Fla. -- Should drug offenders and non-violent criminals spend less time in prison? Some lawmakers think so.

Two bills that would change the mandatory minimum sentencing guidelines have been making the rounds in Tallahassee.


http://www.firstcoastnews.com/news/...Violent-Criminals-Could-Get-Less-Prison-Time-
 
Twall, Thank You for correcting the dates of Ronald Cummings arrest and incarceration in Sarasota County. It brings the actual deception perpetrated on the court into an even more clear focus.

On page 2 of his action for custody dated 9/16/2005, Ronald Cummings told the court of his stable home life and fulltime job.

“Father has a stable permanent home. holds a fulltime job”

He also told the court of how he alone had provided for the children for over 30 days:

“he has provided for children for over thirty days with no help from Mother”

We know from his own testimony that, of the thirty days preceding his filing date of 9/16/2005, Ronald Cummings actually spent, up to, two weeks in Texas and Mexico

From page 3 of the REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE GENERAL MAGISTRATE ON FINAL JUDGMENT OF PATERNITY dated 12/27/2005:

9. The father testified that he has had residential custody of the two children since mid-August 2005. The father testified that he picked the children up to take them on vacation to Mexico and Texas and when he returned he did not deliver them to the mother based on reports he received that the mother was abusing cocaine.

This was even supported, as to the dates, by Crystal’s testimony on page 9 of the same document:

18. The mother testified that the children lived with she and the father until their separation. After that the children lived with her until the father took them by mutual agreement for extended visitation in August 2005. The mother testified she did not hear from the father for over a month, and when they again made contact, she requested the children be returned to her custody and the father refused.

Now, thanks to your information, we find out several important facts.

-Ronald Cummings was arrested over 200 miles away from his home in Putnam County on MONDAY 9/26/2005 for drug charges, TEN DAYS after swearing to the court of his fulltime job.

-Ronald Cummings was arrested and incarcerated regarding these drug charges for three days, JUST LIKE CRYSTAL TOLD THE COURT in her letter, TEN DAYS after swearing to the court of how he cared and provided for the children.

-Ronald Cummings was arrested for these drug charges within a matter of days of his return from a country that is alleged to be one of the drug capitals of the world.

My question is very simple. When the hell did he find time for this fulltime job?
 
As most of you know, Crystal was not present for this hearing because she wasn’t even aware of it being scheduled.

Why wasn’t she aware? Because the address given to the court for Crystal by Ronald Cummings was, in fact, the address of a process server and NOT CRYSTAL SHEFFIELD!

Yesssssssss it goes to the process server who then takes it to crystal she must sign for it they dont just send it in the mail....

she gets served!

there is enuff blame to go around here she is no saint in my book.
Haleigh was with ron from the time she was 2. for 3 years she couldnt do anything????????
Sorry im not buying it.

Maybe now that she has Jr. she can finally do the right thing.
 
Yesssssssss it goes to the process server who then takes it to crystal she must sign for it they dont just send it in the mail....

she gets served!

there is enuff blame to go around here she is no saint in my book.
Haleigh was with ron from the time she was 2. for 3 years she couldnt do anything????????
Sorry im not buying it.

Maybe now that she has Jr. she can finally do the right thing.

Good morning Eileen, ITA, and the Bar document covers this. Back to theory and motive, Crystal did not have a motive imo, and was not involved in HaLeigh going missing. I keep coming back to Tommy. My theory now includes Tommy, and motive imo would be either abuse, or if HaLeigh witnessed something, his motive would have a couple parts, not wanting anyone to know, not wanting Ron and Lindsy in particular to know, wanting to keep his wife and children, and not wanting to end up in prison. A lot of motives imo, although I really hate to think about it. I also think it's possible if not ptobable that the individual who was not named in Misty's sentencing, who it was said abused her for several years, was Tommy. I just don't know. He puts himself there for a reason, and has told the Joe stories for a reason imo. I don't believe joe was involved. Jmo
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Members online

Online statistics

Members online
243
Guests online
485
Total visitors
728

Forum statistics

Threads
625,779
Messages
18,509,689
Members
240,841
Latest member
womanofsteel69
Back
Top