General theory thread and motives rehashed #4

Status
Not open for further replies.
Do you mean this?

http://www.artharris.com/2009/04/27/exclusive-haleigh-cummings-dads-solid-alibi/

I always thought this was a bit disingenuous. If people saw him at the plant all night that's one thing but cell phone pings do not show he never left the plant, it just shows that his phone didn't ping anywhere else. It's not surgically attached to his person and can be turned off at will.

Shoemaker, himself, stated Ron could not be accounted for the entire duration of his shift..JMHO
 
Shoemaker, himself, stated Ron could not be accounted for the entire duration of his shift..JMHO

I love they say, oh Ronald usually got to his shift 45 minutes early. Yeah right.:floorlaugh:jmo
 
I love they say, oh Ronald usually got to his shift 45 minutes early. Yeah right.:floorlaugh:jmo

If true it sounds like he couldn't be bothered to spend one minute with Haleigh. He'd have fleed home for no apparent reason the minute she got home from the school bus.
 
If true it sounds like he couldn't be bothered to spend one minute with Haleigh. He'd have fleed home for no apparent reason the minute she got home from the school bus.

AND...that is the story that want us to believe. Ron picked HaLeigh up, let her drive home, took her inside, kissy kiss with everyone and left to go to work. But before he left HaLeigh told him she would see him when he got home from work.... (and THAT line, is the most unbelievable, imo)

jmo
 
Do you mean this?

http://www.artharris.com/2009/04/27/exclusive-haleigh-cummings-dads-solid-alibi/

I always thought this was a bit disingenuous. If people saw him at the plant all night that's one thing but cell phone pings do not show he never left the plant, it just shows that his phone didn't ping anywhere else. It's not surgically attached to his person and can be turned off at will.


Someone tried to tell me that it was pings from two towers close to his work. I still don't understand two pings and all those calls that have been talked about. You're right, two pings during all those mystery hours is as much proof he was there all night, as AS or was TN's statement that someone saw Misty there so she was at home all night.
 
The "Misty's new interview" thread has given me reason to go back and look at all that she has said previously compared to what she says now. With that, it is reasonable to want to discuss prior interviews of hers as well as statements made by others. I know we are not supposed to discuss anything in that thread other than the interview so my I thought it best to post this here rather than there.

Everyone in this case has lied about one thing or another. Misty certainly has lied. Tommy has. TN and AS have contradicted themselves at times. So has Ron. Also, I believe Ron lies by omission as well.

I believe Ronald Cummings to be an abusive man. He has, no doubt in my mind, abused Amber, Crystal and Misty, and it is not a stretch to see that he also abused his children. We heard Crystal say that and Crystal also predicted something happening to her kids if they were left in Ronald's custody.

And something has happened to one of Crystal's kids. It happened while in Ronalds' custody. Someone harmed this child and there are a lot of opinions here about who did and who didn't do what.

I do not have a "favorite" perp. Meaning, I am not looking at this case to see who I despise the most and then naming that person the perp based solely on my personal feelings against the person.

I cannot stand Misty Croslin. Why she lies is irrelevant to me in a missing/murdered child case. Misty was a child herself and very immature but even a young child will come to see that they will have to tell the truth eventually...that lies will only get them so far before they are cornered with only the truth setting them free.

I do not like Tommy. To me he was so into his own pleasures that he in certain ways neglected the needs of his family. Pills at the bus stop FGS. He just wasn't a good dad or a good husband, by my standards.

Ronald Cummings was Haleigh's dad. He stole Haleigh from her mom and then when something happened to Haleigh, tried to blame her mom. He strutted around calling himself "the better parent."

A judge gave custody of two vulnerable children to an abusive temperamental dad, all because of his ability to lie and charm people into doing what he wanted. To me, Ron is a sociopath at the very least. Judges are not medical professionals and may not be expected to see personality disorders, but a little bit of background checking in the custody case would have give much important information to the court so that those children would NOT have been left in Ronald's custody...not in a million years.

Ron did not cooperate with the LE investigation into the disappearance of his daughter, at least not for long. Why not? If he cared about his kids his life would have been an open book to LE for as long as it took to find out where Haleigh was and what happened that night in February 2009.

Then, this "better parent" who still had custody of his son goes out dealing drugs left and right until finallly he was caught in a drug sting designed solely for the purpose of bringing in all the players in the Haleigh case. This just shows that even in the face of having lost one child to his disgusting, self-serving lifestyle, this great dad not only ignored LE's pleas for information to find his daughter, but didn't care even a tiny bit about his surviving son.

I do not know if Ronald Cummings directly harmed Haleigh that day, but I do know that he directly harmed her via abuse on other days. And I will see for once and for all, if Ronald Cummings is just a victim of circumstance regarding Haleigh, and he had nothing to do with either her demise or the subsequent cover-up...WTF was he doing cavorting with the person LE had claimed was the last person to see Haleigh, the person with the key to the investigation, and maybe the person who killed his daughter????

Who does that? I mean, besides Ronald Cummings?
 
The "Misty's new interview" thread has given me reason to go back and look at all that she has said previously compared to what she says now. With that, it is reasonable to want to discuss prior interviews of hers as well as statements made by others. I know we are not supposed to discuss anything in that thread other than the interview so my I thought it best to post this here rather than there.

Everyone in this case has lied about one thing or another. Misty certainly has lied. Tommy has. TN and AS have contradicted themselves at times. So has Ron. Also, I believe Ron lies by omission as well.

I believe Ronald Cummings to be an abusive man. He has, no doubt in my mind, abused Amber, Crystal and Misty, and it is not a stretch to see that he also abused his children. We heard Crystal say that and Crystal also predicted something happening to her kids if they were left in Ronald's custody.

And something has happened to one of Crystal's kids. It happened while in Ronalds' custody. Someone harmed this child and there are a lot of opinions here about who did and who didn't do what.

I do not have a "favorite" perp. Meaning, I am not looking at this case to see who I despise the most and then naming that person the perp based solely on my personal feelings against the person.

I cannot stand Misty Croslin. Why she lies is irrelevant to me in a missing/murdered child case. Misty was a child herself and very immature but even a young child will come to see that they will have to tell the truth eventually...that lies will only get them so far before they are cornered with only the truth setting them free.

I do not like Tommy. To me he was so into his own pleasures that he in certain ways neglected the needs of his family. Pills at the bus stop FGS. He just wasn't a good dad or a good husband, by my standards.

Ronald Cummings was Haleigh's dad. He stole Haleigh from her mom and then when something happened to Haleigh, tried to blame her mom. He strutted around calling himself "the better parent."

A judge gave custody of two vulnerable children to an abusive temperamental dad, all because of his ability to lie and charm people into doing what he wanted. To me, Ron is a sociopath at the very least. Judges are not medical professionals and may not be expected to see personality disorders, but a little bit of background checking in the custody case would have give much important information to the court so that those children would NOT have been left in Ronald's custody...not in a million years.

Ron did not cooperate with the LE investigation into the disappearance of his daughter, at least not for long. Why not? If he cared about his kids his life would have been an open book to LE for as long as it took to find out where Haleigh was and what happened that night in February 2009.

Then, this "better parent" who still had custody of his son goes out dealing drugs left and right until finallly he was caught in a drug sting designed solely for the purpose of bringing in all the players in the Haleigh case. This just shows that even in the face of having lost one child to his disgusting, self-serving lifestyle, this great dad not only ignored LE's pleas for information to find his daughter, but didn't care even a tiny bit about his surviving son.

I do not know if Ronald Cummings directly harmed Haleigh that day, but I do know that he directly harmed her via abuse on other days. And I will see for once and for all, if Ronald Cummings is just a victim of circumstance regarding Haleigh, and he had nothing to do with either her demise or the subsequent cover-up...WTF was he doing cavorting with the person LE had claimed was the last person to see Haleigh, the person with the key to the investigation, and maybe the person who killed his daughter????

Who does that? I mean, besides Ronald Cummings?

Well, maybe he was just so smitten with Misty he just said to himself, I dont care if she did kill my daughter, or any of her kin did, I love her anyways? Its either that or he killed and disposed of his child.

jmo
 
The "Misty's new interview" thread has given me reason to go back and look at all that she has said previously compared to what she says now. With that, it is reasonable to want to discuss prior interviews of hers as well as statements made by others. I know we are not supposed to discuss anything in that thread other than the interview so my I thought it best to post this here rather than there.

Everyone in this case has lied about one thing or another. Misty certainly has lied. Tommy has. TN and AS have contradicted themselves at times. So has Ron. Also, I believe Ron lies by omission as well.

I believe Ronald Cummings to be an abusive man. He has, no doubt in my mind, abused Amber, Crystal and Misty, and it is not a stretch to see that he also abused his children. We heard Crystal say that and Crystal also predicted something happening to her kids if they were left in Ronald's custody.

And something has happened to one of Crystal's kids. It happened while in Ronalds' custody. Someone harmed this child and there are a lot of opinions here about who did and who didn't do what.

I do not have a "favorite" perp. Meaning, I am not looking at this case to see who I despise the most and then naming that person the perp based solely on my personal feelings against the person.

I cannot stand Misty Croslin. Why she lies is irrelevant to me in a missing/murdered child case. Misty was a child herself and very immature but even a young child will come to see that they will have to tell the truth eventually...that lies will only get them so far before they are cornered with only the truth setting them free.

I do not like Tommy. To me he was so into his own pleasures that he in certain ways neglected the needs of his family. Pills at the bus stop FGS. He just wasn't a good dad or a good husband, by my standards.

Ronald Cummings was Haleigh's dad. He stole Haleigh from her mom and then when something happened to Haleigh, tried to blame her mom. He strutted around calling himself "the better parent."

A judge gave custody of two vulnerable children to an abusive temperamental dad, all because of his ability to lie and charm people into doing what he wanted. To me, Ron is a sociopath at the very least. Judges are not medical professionals and may not be expected to see personality disorders, but a little bit of background checking in the custody case would have give much important information to the court so that those children would NOT have been left in Ronald's custody...not in a million years.

Ron did not cooperate with the LE investigation into the disappearance of his daughter, at least not for long. Why not? If he cared about his kids his life would have been an open book to LE for as long as it took to find out where Haleigh was and what happened that night in February 2009.

Then, this "better parent" who still had custody of his son goes out dealing drugs left and right until finallly he was caught in a drug sting designed solely for the purpose of bringing in all the players in the Haleigh case. This just shows that even in the face of having lost one child to his disgusting, self-serving lifestyle, this great dad not only ignored LE's pleas for information to find his daughter, but didn't care even a tiny bit about his surviving son.

I do not know if Ronald Cummings directly harmed Haleigh that day, but I do know that he directly harmed her via abuse on other days. And I will see for once and for all, if Ronald Cummings is just a victim of circumstance regarding Haleigh, and he had nothing to do with either her demise or the subsequent cover-up...WTF was he doing cavorting with the person LE had claimed was the last person to see Haleigh, the person with the key to the investigation, and maybe the person who killed his daughter????Who does that? I mean, besides Ronald Cummings?

Good post. Especially the parts that I bolded. People rarely do anything without a reason, and unfortunately reason's that benefit THEMSELVES. Ronald does lie by omission....and so does Misty. What they havent said speaks volumes..there is a reason for this.

You are right lies will only get Misty so far...and she is at the end. The only way she can get further and help herself is to keep lying. WHY? Because she is guilty as can be. To tell the truth now would not help her, it would only make things worse...because she is guilty of causing the death of Haleigh, otherwise she would be singing like a canary. Period. She has tried to implicate many people in this, hoping that something would stick to someone so she could escape being looked at any longer. This points to guilt and also if she was throwing stuff around hoping it would stick, she would certainly point the finger at anyone she knew to be guilty. This is not a LOYAL person who would sacrifice herself by anymeans. Levi is so right.....the fact that she did not take immunity speaks louder and truer than anything else in this case ever has. It has solitified my ever changing views in this case. It has also made me admit that I have been wrong...about Ronald. I believed him for so long, and as the above post pointed out, I was fooled and charmed, like so many others, by him. I should know better. I do believe that he is a sociopath and I do believe that he is at least partly to blame for his child's death. I believe the child was given drugs to sleep, by Ron's permission or order, by phone. I do believe he was at werk when Haleigh actually died. But that Misty had frantically called him when she discovered the child was no longer breathing. I believe that it is possible that someone else was involved in the cover up, but probably not Tommy, as I believe he would have told by now...he is in prison, because he has lied and lied and lied trying to find something that would explain the childs dissapearance and now no one believes anything he says. He is not the sharpest knife in the drawer. I think if he knew for certain, he would have said by now. The only thing that bothers me about this part is the rat in the mailbox. If Tommy knows nothing, then why the rat? And if he does know, and Ron is safely behind bars, why doesnt Tommy tell the truth? This part bothers me.

Timmy fled...Timmy helped in the cover up. But where was Joe during all this? Due to his silence I believe he really may not know anything or he would have spoke up when fingers were being pointed at him.

I doubt TN and AS were involved, but anything is possible. I think they are more guilty of enjoying the attention, as is FH and LC. I believe HC is completely in the dark about what happened that night, and he really would like to know.

There was no blood found in the MH or any signs of violence, so this is why I feel she was ODed...I just can not bellieve that any of these players are so good that they would have been able to completely cover up any signs of a violent death, or even a sexual assault resulting in a death. I think Haleigh vomitted on the blankets during her death and that was the reason behind them being washed.

As someone so brilliantly pointed out in an earlier post, Ron knew he was going to do a lot of time...yes, he did. He also knew this was connected to Haleigh being missing and since he knew he would be worse off by telling what happened (because he would implicate himself), he would have to do the whole sentence for the drug dealing. I do think he was told upfront and even shown the video evidence right away, so he knew that they had him and his only way out was tellling all he knew about that night...but he didnt because he is to blame, so he knew he was going to face all the time for the drug charges.

Everything, IMO, done in this case is done for a reason...for selfish reasons only. Everyone is out to save their own arses and no one is covering for anybody. All of them would throw one another under the bus if they knew they could to get this over and done with.
 
Good post. Especially the parts that I bolded. People rarely do anything without a reason, and unfortunately reason's that benefit THEMSELVES. Ronald does lie by omission....and so does Misty. What they havent said speaks volumes..there is a reason for this.

You are right lies will only get Misty so far...and she is at the end. The only way she can get further and help herself is to keep lying. WHY? Because she is guilty as can be. To tell the truth now would not help her, it would only make things worse...because she is guilty of causing the death of Haleigh, otherwise she would be singing like a canary. Period. She has tried to implicate many people in this, hoping that something would stick to someone so she could escape being looked at any longer. This points to guilt and also if she was throwing stuff around hoping it would stick, she would certainly point the finger at anyone she knew to be guilty. This is not a LOYAL person who would sacrifice herself by anymeans. Levi is so right.....the fact that she did not take immunity speaks louder and truer than anything else in this case ever has. It has solitified my ever changing views in this case. It has also made me admit that I have been wrong...about Ronald. I believed him for so long, and as the above post pointed out, I was fooled and charmed, like so many others, by him. I should know better. I do believe that he is a sociopath and I do believe that he is at least partly to blame for his child's death. I believe the child was given drugs to sleep, by Ron's permission or order, by phone. I do believe he was at werk when Haleigh actually died. But that Misty had frantically called him when she discovered the child was no longer breathing. I believe that it is possible that someone else was involved in the cover up, but probably not Tommy, as I believe he would have told by now...he is in prison, because he has lied and lied and lied trying to find something that would explain the childs dissapearance and now no one believes anything he says. He is not the sharpest knife in the drawer. I think if he knew for certain, he would have said by now. The only thing that bothers me about this part is the rat in the mailbox. If Tommy knows nothing, then why the rat? And if he does know, and Ron is safely behind bars, why doesnt Tommy tell the truth? This part bothers me.

Timmy fled...Timmy helped in the cover up. But where was Joe during all this? Due to his silence I believe he really may not know anything or he would have spoke up when fingers were being pointed at him.

I doubt TN and AS were involved, but anything is possible. I think they are more guilty of enjoying the attention, as is FH and LC. I believe HC is completely in the dark about what happened that night, and he really would like to know.

There was no blood found in the MH or any signs of violence, so this is why I feel she was ODed...I just can not bellieve that any of these players are so good that they would have been able to completely cover up any signs of a violent death, or even a sexual assault resulting in a death. I think Haleigh vomitted on the blankets during her death and that was the reason behind them being washed.

As someone so brilliantly pointed out in an earlier post, Ron knew he was going to do a lot of time...yes, he did. He also knew this was connected to Haleigh being missing and since he knew he would be worse off by telling what happened (because he would implicate himself), he would have to do the whole sentence for the drug dealing. I do think he was told upfront and even shown the video evidence right away, so he knew that they had him and his only way out was tellling all he knew about that night...but he didnt because he is to blame, so he knew he was going to face all the time for the drug charges.

Everything, IMO, done in this case is done for a reason...for selfish reasons only. Everyone is out to save their own arses and no one is covering for anybody. All of them would throw one another under the bus if they knew they could to get this over and done with.
This is what I think about that rat...Ron sent it to Tommy to keep him from ratting on Misty. Tommy told cops that he went by and Misty was gone. Was that part true? LE acted like they believed it, because they let him out of jail for that tidbit. If Tommy was willing to say that much, and then got the rat as a reminder to shut up, then why in the heck didn't he eventually tell more? and He does know more or Ron wouldn't have bothered with him. IMO, Tommy isn't scared of Ron or dead rats. So Why hasn't he finished what he started? I don't think Tommy is any more loyal to Misty than she is to him, so WTH is the hold up here? Once the JO story didn't pan out, Tommy was backed into a corner and should have been forced to tell the truth. Misty recanted, so why didn't he? If he was lying for her, why didn't he follow her lead? The jig was up. She told LE point blank to ask Tommy. He knew everything. That was her cue to spill the beans. If he's not the perp, then I seriously don't get him. If it wasn't for Tommy, I would be 100% convinced that Misty was the perp and Ron was covering for her. Tommy shouldn't factor in at all, but here he is...involved in every scenario, always hovering around in the background, never too far from what's happening.MOO.
 
The "Misty's new interview" thread has given me reason to go back and look at all that she has said previously compared to what she says now. With that, it is reasonable to want to discuss prior interviews of hers as well as statements made by others. I know we are not supposed to discuss anything in that thread other than the interview so my I thought it best to post this here rather than there.

Everyone in this case has lied about one thing or another. Misty certainly has lied. Tommy has. TN and AS have contradicted themselves at times. So has Ron. Also, I believe Ron lies by omission as well.

I believe Ronald Cummings to be an abusive man. He has, no doubt in my mind, abused Amber, Crystal and Misty, and it is not a stretch to see that he also abused his children. We heard Crystal say that and Crystal also predicted something happening to her kids if they were left in Ronald's custody.

And something has happened to one of Crystal's kids. It happened while in Ronalds' custody. Someone harmed this child and there are a lot of opinions here about who did and who didn't do what.

I do not have a "favorite" perp. Meaning, I am not looking at this case to see who I despise the most and then naming that person the perp based solely on my personal feelings against the person.

I cannot stand Misty Croslin. Why she lies is irrelevant to me in a missing/murdered child case. Misty was a child herself and very immature but even a young child will come to see that they will have to tell the truth eventually...that lies will only get them so far before they are cornered with only the truth setting them free.

I do not like Tommy. To me he was so into his own pleasures that he in certain ways neglected the needs of his family. Pills at the bus stop FGS. He just wasn't a good dad or a good husband, by my standards.

Ronald Cummings was Haleigh's dad. He stole Haleigh from her mom and then when something happened to Haleigh, tried to blame her mom. He strutted around calling himself "the better parent."

A judge gave custody of two vulnerable children to an abusive temperamental dad, all because of his ability to lie and charm people into doing what he wanted. To me, Ron is a sociopath at the very least. Judges are not medical professionals and may not be expected to see personality disorders, but a little bit of background checking in the custody case would have give much important information to the court so that those children would NOT have been left in Ronald's custody...not in a million years.

Ron did not cooperate with the LE investigation into the disappearance of his daughter, at least not for long. Why not? If he cared about his kids his life would have been an open book to LE for as long as it took to find out where Haleigh was and what happened that night in February 2009.

Then, this "better parent" who still had custody of his son goes out dealing drugs left and right until finallly he was caught in a drug sting designed solely for the purpose of bringing in all the players in the Haleigh case. This just shows that even in the face of having lost one child to his disgusting, self-serving lifestyle, this great dad not only ignored LE's pleas for information to find his daughter, but didn't care even a tiny bit about his surviving son.

I do not know if Ronald Cummings directly harmed Haleigh that day, but I do know that he directly harmed her via abuse on other days. And I will see for once and for all, if Ronald Cummings is just a victim of circumstance regarding Haleigh, and he had nothing to do with either her demise or the subsequent cover-up...WTF was he doing cavorting with the person LE had claimed was the last person to see Haleigh, the person with the key to the investigation, and maybe the person who killed his daughter????

Who does that? I mean, besides Ronald Cummings?
I can't say I can't stand Misty. I can't even say I can't stand Ron. It was those stupid honeymoon pictures that did it for me. What I saw were 2 young, really immature something or others. Misty looked like a little kid and Ron with his crooked hat and silly face looked like a lovestruck school boy. And they were married!!! and smiling and hamming it up! And his daughter was missing. oh my goodness. These were pictures of the real Ron and Misty. He wasn't the tough guy we'd heard about and she wasn't the lying little witch. IDK what they were, but those pictures convinced me, (I don't know why), that whatever happened... it wasn't premeditated or calculated. They looked so out of touch that I started thinking that whatever happened, happened because of their immaturity and total disregard for the children's safety. They looked like 2 kids trying to take care of 2 other kids. I'm not sure what it means, but if nothing else, those pictures showed a different side to those 2MOO.
 
Did Misty confirm she was offered immunity?
She said something or somebody said she said, lol, (I'll have to look), that if she gave up something, anything, that she would be let out of jail. She didn't use the word immunity. MOO.
 
She said something or somebody said she said, lol, (I'll have to look), that if she gave up something, anything, that she would be let out of jail. She didn't use the word immunity. MOO.

i believe it was reported by AH, for whatever that is worth :)


I hope someone explained to Misty exactly what immunity was, like her attorney, in a way that Misty will understand. JMO
 
She said something or somebody said she said, lol, (I'll have to look), that if she gave up something, anything, that she would be let out of jail. She didn't use the word immunity. MOO.

If the LE truly thought Misty had killed Haleigh and disposed of her, they would not offer her immunity. The LE know Ronald is behind all of this and she is covering, they have known since they both failed their lie detectors, imo.

Anyways, its only Art Harris who says LE offered her immunity, and I need confirmation from them to consider that a factor with her.

jmo
 
If the LE truly thought Misty had killed Haleigh and disposed of her, they would not offer her immunity. The LE know Ronald is behind all of this and she is covering, they have known since they both failed their lie detectors, imo.

Anyways, its only Art Harris who says LE offered her immunity, and I need confirmation from them to consider that a factor with her.

jmo
That's what I thought at 1st & even felt relief that Misty wan't the perp. BUT then I started thinking... maybe LE in an attempt to retrieve Haleigh's body, offered the immunity to put an end to this. The reported immunity didn't affect her drug sentence, so she would still be stuck with the 25 years. I was thinking that maybe LE considered 25 years just for what she did...because she was a minor at the time. IDK, that's just guesswork on my part, because I don't know how immunity works. Is LE allowed to work with a suspected perp like this? It doesn't seem likely, but I was trying to consider the different possibilities, and I have to admit, this idea has kind of stuck with me. But if this is the case, Misty's lawyer should have jumped on the chance. Why wouldn't she protect herself from future prosecution? There's just no figuring these people out. MOO.
 
If the LE truly thought Misty had killed Haleigh and disposed of her, they would not offer her immunity. The LE know Ronald is behind all of this and she is covering, they have known since they both failed their lie detectors, imo.

Anyways, its only Art Harris who says LE offered her immunity, and I need confirmation from them to consider that a factor with her.

jmo
My main problem with LE is how hard they've been on Misty. called her the key and relentlessly hounded her. I just wanted them to cut her some slack, because of her age and life circumstances. Well, if this reported immunity offer is true, LE DID try to cut her some slack. Maybe when it's all said and done, they 'get' that her being in that house and playing mommy wasn't her doing. If the offer is true, I hope for Misty's sake that the reason she didn't take it is because she's not the perp. But if she is the perp, LE knows it. She took enough tests to determine that much. MOO.
 
Did Misty confirm she was offered immunity?

Not only has Misty not confirmed it, no one in LE has either.

Misty did say she was told at the time of her drug sentencing that if she talked she could walk. So maybe that's being seen as an immunity offer, but I have not heard Misty or any LE say she or anyone else has been offfered immunity for anything Haleigh related. Only that she could walk from the drug charges. And Tommy was told that as well; he mentioned it once in a phone conversation with Hank.
 
My main problem with LE is how hard they've been on Misty. called her the key and relentlessly hounded her. I just wanted them to cut her some slack, because of her age and life circumstances. Well, if this reported immunity offer is true, LE DID try to cut her some slack. Maybe when it's all said and done, they 'get' that her being in that house and playing mommy wasn't her doing. If the offer is true, I hope for Misty's sake that the reason she didn't take it is because she's not the perp. But if she is the perp, LE knows it. She took enough tests to determine that much. MOO.

She was 17, most kids at that age are ready for college or getting ready to go be deployed and fight for our country. What do you think happens when you are last known to be watching a missing child, comfort should not be extended to her,nor glossing her over using her age, its just not an excuse, imo. And LE has not even said they offered her immunity, so I cant pretend its true and work around that. jmo
 
She was 17, most kids at that age are ready for college or getting ready to go be deployed and fight for our country. What do you think happens when you are last known to be watching a missing child, comfort should not be extended to her,nor glossing her over using her age, its just not an excuse, imo. And LE has not even said they offered her immunity, so I cant pretend its true and work around that. jmo
She had just turned 17 and had moved in with Ron when she was 16. That's too young for somebody like Misty to be taking care of 2 kids... one not much more than a baby and the other one sick with special needs. Sorry, but IMO, Misty shouldn't have been there. And IMO, her age is a factor. One of the main reasons I think so is because of Ron's age. If this had been a case of 2 teenagers, I might feel differently, but he was a grown man who chose to move somebody like Misty in. Yes, her parents are at fault too, but Ron's kids were his responsibility, not theirs. Art Harris ran the immunity story based on information from his sources and I have no reason to not believe them. All MOO.
 
She had just turned 17 and had moved in with Ron when she was 16. That's too young for somebody like Misty to be taking care of 2 kids... one not much more than a baby and the other one sick with special needs. Sorry, but IMO, Misty shouldn't have been there. And IMO, her age is a factor. One of the main reasons I think so is because of Ron's age. If this had been a case of 2 teenagers, I might feel differently, but he was a grown man who chose to move somebody like Misty in. Yes, her parents are at fault too, but Ron's kids were his responsibility, not theirs. Art Harris ran the immunity story based on information from his sources and I have no reason to not believe them. All MOO.

Dodie, IF she had just been there just as a babysitter, for short periods of time, I think she was old enough. But you are right, she shoudn't have been there in the capacity she held. She wasn't old enough, mature enough, plus she was a druggie.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Staff online

Members online

Online statistics

Members online
230
Guests online
843
Total visitors
1,073

Forum statistics

Threads
625,922
Messages
18,514,134
Members
240,885
Latest member
taylurrc
Back
Top