- Joined
- Nov 4, 2017
- Messages
- 3,076
- Reaction score
- 24,718
At the very least, a witness, yes. She and her attorney can't have it both ways. Her hair was found on victims, inside burlap, and on tape that was found, wrapped around the skeletal remains of victims. But she doesn't think he's capable of being the killer. How might it have gotten there if not by RH? And her lawyer made a comment way back, suggesting RH might be guilty. Which is it then?The point about the hairs is it leads so obviously to Rex, it makes the witness' behavior bizarre. It doesn't make his wife an instant suspect, it makes her an instant witness, and she should be searching information at home, not in hearings.
She doesn't think he is capable? She would know better than I, frankly. She has the ability to help identify exculpatory information, and, since her life and Rex's are clearly somewhat adjacent to the murders, find clues to point LE in a more productive direction.
I disagree about Rex (if he's the perp) not noticing a hair. Clearly he noticed hairs and avoided them. Otherwise, there would have been many more found at the scene.
MOO
I agree about noticing the hairs. Only four hairs found on four women's remains even using tape, a belt and burlap for packaging. You'd think there'd be more. MOO.
Last edited: