Fire Island I’m guessing.I hadn’t heard of Jamie Seymour before. Wow she looks good as a LISK victim! IMO…And she could fit the timeline perfectly. Right there between Jessica and Maureen. But where could he have dumped her?
Fire island Doe? That was Karen Vergata I think.Fire Island I’m guessing.
Green Rubbermaid containers make, IMO, sense to have been utensils of the gardening wife perhaps.I'm not really sure if green Rubbermaid containers would be in higher demand on Christmas just because they're green. Do you expect green plant pots or rakes to go on sale during Christmas?
No, I don’t mean KV. RH seems to enjoy bringing parts of his different victims together and so far no one else than KV has been found on FI.Fire island Doe? That was Karen Vergata I think.
Jamie Seymour is most likely dead. Yes, still an opinion, but backed by fact. She had a huge lump on her neck from a thyroid condition. She would have eventually showed up at a doctors office. But she has not.
Oh ok. I see what you mean. I thought you were actually referring to a doe that had been found. I feel like Karen Vergata may, have at least partially, been dumped into the ocean and washed ashore. That would be another reason a body may never turn up.No, I don’t mean KV. RH seems to enjoy bringing parts of his different victims together and so far no one else than KV has been found on FI.
So I’m thinking he may have placed others’ body parts on FI that are yet to be recovered. So that KV would have company or something.
It’s a wild not to say desperate guess.
Good work here @Mr.Dandy @TOMBISHOP and @SimsGuy67 …..I completely agree about men. I don’t think they are part of his victim list but….. it does prove that there were other killers using parts of Long Island as their dumping ground. I don’t know if that fact alone muddies the waters but it is true. It could see doubt about some of the other estranged victims.
I really, really feel strongly about Jamie as a potential victim. There are just too many similarities to other victims. Occupation, last seen location, time of year (two years almost to the day after the last charged murder), age, physical description (she's taller than some, but only an inch taller than Megan, she also has hazel eyes and a slim build) ....I hadn’t heard of Jamie Seymour before. Wow she looks good as a LISK victim! IMO…And she could fit the timeline perfectly. Right there between Jessica and Maureen. But where could he have dumped her?
Good work here @Mr.Dandy @TOMBISHOP and @SimsGuy67 …..
IDK….. wondering if might be good not to remove any possible victims yet based on the victims gender? Thinking - what if the assailant was not initially aware of the individual’s gender? Or maybe it was
I could see this. I wonder if he tried different disposal methods but found he really liked when they were discovered and made the news. He needed his trophies.I really, really feel strongly about Jamie as a potential victim. There are just too many similarities to other victims. Occupation, last seen location, time of year (two years almost to the day after the last charged murder), age, physical description (she's taller than some, but only an inch taller than Megan, she also has hazel eyes and a slim build) ....
As to why no part of her has been found, well, maybe he disposed of her differently. I think on his kill plan he mentioned dumpsters as a possible disposal option. If she went to landfill, possibly dismembered and scattered between several different bins, she will never be found. If she's somewhere still on the island, either in the woods or on the dunes, she may one day be recovered.
MOO
There is a new post today by Jamie's ex- boyfriend on her thread..I really, really feel strongly about Jamie as a potential victim. There are just too many similarities to other victims. Occupation, last seen location, time of year (two years almost to the day after the last charged murder), age, physical description (she's taller than some, but only an inch taller than Megan, she also has hazel eyes and a slim build) ....
As to why no part of her has been found, well, maybe he disposed of her differently. I think on his kill plan he mentioned dumpsters as a possible disposal option. If she went to landfill, possibly dismembered and scattered between several different bins, she will never be found. If she's somewhere still on the island, either in the woods or on the dunes, she may one day be recovered.
MOO
I've got those exact same green (and blue) Rubbermaid containers. I'm going to say I've had them since the early 90's. Not Christmas colors but the colors of the day. Rose/pink was also around then and I have that color too. Same colors my kitchen counters were when we built in '89.Green Rubbermaid containers make, IMO, sense to have been utensils of the gardening wife perhaps.
Somewhere up thread IIRC @Mr.Dandy I believe I recall reading something along those lines? I believe that computer or similar internet search history had indicated the suspect was searching for updates on victims in the case? And IIRC details as to possible discoveries in the case as they were being reported? (I won’t be able to find it now. And I don’t think I am confusing with another case but I might well be.) MOOThat’s very interesting…. The plane crash. Part of me wonders if Rex was excited when his victims were found. Not that she is one, just hypothetically. Excited, but nervous too. If Karen was his victim, she would have been the first known dismemberment. Now, that’s a pretty hard thing to pull off… regardless of who killed her. It requires time, space, tools, privacy, ideal clean up.
As for records, I’m sure LE looked for Karen herself and any other potential suspects they may have had back then. They would be terrible cops if they didn’t. Now that Rex is out, I hope they cross reference with him
Indeed. I know his internet search history is part of LEs key evidence (that they have released), but I don’t recall Karen ever being a part of that. However, her identity was revealed during the course of RHs arrest and subsequent investigation. I don’t know if that means she was a potential victim, still a potential victim or ruled out completely, for whatever reason.Somewhere up thread IIRC @Mr.Dandy I believe I recall reading something along those lines? I believe that computer or similar internet search history had indicated the suspect was searching for updates on victims in the case? And IIRC details as to possible discoveries in the case as they were being reported? (I won’t be able to find it now. And I don’t think I am confusing with another case but I might well be.) MOO
Something just occurred to me concerning his searches. The timing of his searching for names and the date LE knew who a body was would be incriminating IF RH ever searched by name for someone who was still unidentified. That would not have happened, of course, if his searches were just broad searches for updates on LISK.Indeed. I know his internet search history is part of LEs key evidence (that they have released), but I don’t recall Karen ever being a part of that. However, her identity was revealed during the course of RHs arrest and subsequent investigation. I don’t know if that means she was a potential victim, still a potential victim or ruled out completely, for whatever reason.
Oh wouldn’t that be interesting. Suppose they got Karen’s name from Rex….and sure enough, the remains were hers? That would be a wow! Of course, that’s only speculation at this point.Something just occurred to me concerning his searches. The timing of his searching for names and the date LE knew who a body was would be incriminating IF RH ever searched by name for someone who was still unidentified. That would not have happened, of course, if his searches were just broad searches for updates on LISK.
If a body had been found but was unidentified and RH searched for the name of the woman she was later identified to be . . . WOW
After names were announced, of course, by name searches wouldn't mean anything. Don't many of us do that for background? But if RH ever searched too early, perhaps trying to see if LE had any idea who she was, that would be very damning evidence.
Perhaps he did not know their real names as I believe many or most used aliases. But any name later associated with the victim and a location would be telling. As would searches for news of locations where a victim was later found.
LE seems to have so very much information on so many devices to trawl through, how time consuming if must be (and take an army) to examine and compare every detail, then connect all the tiny pieces.
I just wonder at the stories all those searches really tell.
I definitely think he’d had contact with every girl at least once before, with the exception of maybe Sandra and Valerie. Sandra, we just don’t know enough about, and Valerie wasn’t a frequent visitor of New York. At least from what I read about her. If anyone can contradict that, I’d love to see it.Maybe, he stalked the girls before his first contact already until he got their real name. With the real name he was able to control, whether the girls officially would be missing by someone in the near future and since when and by whom (relative or not).