- Joined
- Apr 28, 2014
- Messages
- 1,692
- Reaction score
- 16,559
I've been thinking about this. While I believe RH was smirking because he believes he pulled something over on the State, I'm wondering if maybe he was allowed to think that in order for the prosecution to get what it wanted. Tierney is a seasoned DA. He's seen and dealt with ego and arrogance before.At least, according to the plea agreement, he has to serve his life sentences consecutively, not concurrently. I hope he's not eligible for parole, either. Kind of unusual plea agreement when the prosecution had so much evidence against him.
ETA: There are 3 first degree murder charges to be served consecutively, so it seems pretty likely he will be in prison for life.
The state got confession to guilt enough for three consecutive life sentences without parole or the right to appeal -- if I understood that correctly. If I am remembering correctly, at various times, attorneys or prosecutors on here have explained how much better it is to have a defendant pled it out than to put everything into the hands of a jury because there is truly never any way of knowing how a jury will go. These confessions are "bird in hand".
So, no more taxpayer money spent on a very expensive, drawn out trial, nor in the appeal or parole process. Also, I'm wondering if the FBI Behavioral aspect doesn't get RH into federal hands and completely off Suffolk County money. Is that a possibility? How does that work?
Of course RH is guilty of so many crimes: kidnapping, rape, torture and who can count them all. But to what real practical advantage would it be to charge and try him for all of them? He's in prison for the rest of his life. In New York, could any more be done?
Then, there's behind the scenes we know nothing about. The taskforce has continued to work. With RH in prison for life, perhaps Tierney can move on to other cases. With the suddenness and apparent speed we've seen here, I'm wondering if something else big might be in the works? Just musing and thinking here.