- Joined
- Apr 28, 2014
- Messages
- 1,532
- Reaction score
- 14,960
Something just occurred to me concerning his searches. The timing of his searching for names and the date LE knew who a body was would be incriminating IF RH ever searched by name for someone who was still unidentified. That would not have happened, of course, if his searches were just broad searches for updates on LISK.Indeed. I know his internet search history is part of LEs key evidence (that they have released), but I don’t recall Karen ever being a part of that. However, her identity was revealed during the course of RHs arrest and subsequent investigation. I don’t know if that means she was a potential victim, still a potential victim or ruled out completely, for whatever reason.
If a body had been found but was unidentified and RH searched for the name of the woman she was later identified to be . . . WOW
After names were announced, of course, by name searches wouldn't mean anything. Don't many of us do that for background? But if RH ever searched too early, perhaps trying to see if LE had any idea who she was, that would be very damning evidence.
Perhaps he did not know their real names as I believe many or most used aliases. But any name later associated with the victim and a location would be telling. As would searches for news of locations where a victim was later found.
LE seems to have so very much information on so many devices to trawl through, how time consuming if must be (and take an army) to examine and compare every detail, then connect all the tiny pieces.
I just wonder at the stories all those searches really tell.