Gilgo Beach LISK Serial Killer, Rex Heuermann, charged with 7 murders, July 2023 #16

I thought the same thing! I don't know that I knew the house was his childhood house, but finding out the room of interest was his childhood bedroom was definitely new to me. In a grotesque way, it makes sense that he would chose that as his kill room, especially if his disturbing habits started at a young age. IMO, he began perfecting his plans and crimes in that room.
Seems like a but uncommon pattern. Didn't he lose his dad as a boy, maybe his dark side had its roots in his mom, dating again. Madonna, wh*** complex. Even if what he could maybe have was normal and healthy, it just seems like for every SK there's a story like that lurking in the past. Can't deal with mommy being a sexual human being, develops somehow into serious perverse misogyny. And he chose to play that out throughout his adulthood, killing as he went.

That is one sick, sadistic creature.

JMO
 
John Ray on the Peacock documentary:

JR thinks too many unexplored angles.

After looking at that documentary, I tend to agree. The Peacock documentary just seemed like an AE infomercial on how she didn't know her husband did it. There was practically no new information on anything-- other than how AE never knew her husband was a sadistic serial murderer. And there was precious little provided by her to support the rationale behind her decision to fall in love all over again with RH (gag me) when she went to visit him behind bars.

I'd like to believe she didn't know; I hope it gets easier to somehow believe this, though. Because right now, it's still for me incredibly difficult (jmo).
 
John Ray on the Peacock documentary:

JR thinks too many unexplored angles.

After looking at that documentary, I tend to agree. The Peacock documentary just seemed like an AE infomercial on how she didn't know her husband did it. There was practically no new information on anything-- other than how AE never knew her husband was a sadistic serial murderer. And there was precious little provided by her to support the rationale behind her decision to fall in love all over again with RH (gag me) when she went to visit him behind bars.

I'd like to believe she didn't know; I hope it gets easier to somehow believe this, though. Because right now, it's still for me incredibly difficult (jmo).
That was great. He said he could do 8 hours, but this is only 2. What a tease!

Personally, regarding the H family, I’m mostly concerned with what VH may have been through
as a toddler.

It was interesting to hear that Pak fell asleep during his lie detector test. Yeah, lets clear him. That’s the gold standard of innocence!
 
Last edited:
Newsweek Article about a possible coast to coast murder spree.
He does look like the Virginia sketch of the suspect who murdered Alicia Showalter
1750783648200.webp
 
The height is off in the Showalter description but how weirded out or reliable were the eye witnesses?
also another detail that rings true is this man was approaching various women and this reminds me of Rex..approaching women in parks and on trains ( that we know about).

then add in a green pick up truck just to make it super extra suspicious. mOO
 
another thought is that Rex likes small women based on his victim profiles..so was he approaching
petite women? were these witnesses of smaller stature?

I ask because not only does it add to everything we already know about Rex but also small women
tend to think a man who is very tall is 6 feet tall..so they might tend to think at least 6 feet tall...because even though Rex is huge he was not always super heavy like he is now so even at 6'4 or whatever his height is he didn't have this mountainous look he has now. Really if you are 5ft 2 inches tall - 6 feet tall is really just miles above you.

so maybe it's like he had to be 6 feet tall or more...add the stress of trying to give police a description.

mOO
 
Last edited:
Which errors do you see? I didn't notice, but it maybe because of my memory.
The dates for Reynolds murder - typical chatAi_2025 problem.

”Alicia Showalter Reynolds, a 25-year-old PhD student at Johns Hopkins, was driving to Charlottesville, Virginia on March 2, 1996.”

And then:

”Reynolds was one of five young women who disappeared in that area between 2009 and 2014. Samantha Clarke, 19, was last seen in Orange, Virginia shortly after midnight on Sept. 13, 2010. The Town of Orange Police Department reclassified her disappearance as a murder 11 years later.”

I don’t know how journalists can’t even be bothered to cast a cursory glance at the text that’s been written by a tool for their review.
 
Last edited:
I guess if you are a grammarian. The points come across well though. AI does make errors and that is the nature of the beast. It's the world we all are living in now, even if we don't like it. I'm afraid it is here to stay. Maybe the developers can strive to make it error proof one day.😉
I was hoping we could use it for something worthwhile - like AlphaFold - and retain a demand that humans take a responsibility before publishing material….at least at this early stage of AI evolution.

Also, this is not about grammar. It’s about facts. Years. First AR was killed in 1996 then she was murdered 2009-2014.
 
Last edited:
I guess if you are a grammarian. The points come across well though. AI does make errors and that is the nature of the beast. It's the world we all are living in now, even if we don't like it. I'm afraid it is here to stay. Maybe the developers can strive to make it error proof one day.😉
Error-proof. What a wonderful vision. Not sure error-proof is possible - with or without AI. I read briefly and saw a glaring error that reminded me of a horrible mistake inserted by an editor in one of my stories. Presidential dates. Of an assassinated president. The editor "fixed" it to the usual 4 year cycle. AND printed it without my seeing it again. So, I wondered about this article . . . it may not have been AI responsible for the glaring errors. IF an editor changed something, I feel very confident the writer is livid!
 
Error-proof. What a wonderful vision. Not sure error-proof is possible - with or without AI. I read briefly and saw a glaring error that reminded me of a horrible mistake inserted by an editor in one of my stories. Presidential dates. Of an assassinated president. The editor "fixed" it to the usual 4 year cycle. AND printed it without my seeing it again. So, I wondered about this article . . . it may not have been AI responsible for the glaring errors. IF an editor changed something, I feel very confident the writer is livid!
Very wise - I guess I was just thinking about the other day when copilot kept giving me first good code, then bad code. And referring to line numbering of the code incorrectly.

The last few years’ AI development has given the second law of thermodynamics a further boost.

But sure, it could be an editor who will blame it on flaky Claude. The net effect on the internet is an increase of incorrect statements. Which will not make future models any better.
 

Members online

Online statistics

Members online
168
Guests online
734
Total visitors
902

Forum statistics

Threads
626,348
Messages
18,524,868
Members
241,025
Latest member
mpandasaur
Back
Top