I'm now curious about AE selling the jeep w/o ever having mentioned who was its owner when it was listed on eBay.
In real estate many states do not require the seller/broker to inform potential buyers that the property has a crime history.
Many agencies do inform the potential buyers though due to having been sued by the new owners claiming that they never would have purchased the property and/or lost money when finding out about the crime and sold the property.
Could someone have purchased RH's jeep not knowing it was his because it wasn't advertised as such and then sued AE/agent for not disclosing it had been his?
They would have found out from the bill of sale.
She could have transferred the jeep out of the Huermann/Ellerup name and then donated it to a non-profit organization that traveled on rough terrain.
Like she needs a few thousand dollars after her Peacock deal?
IMO
In real estate many states do not require the seller/broker to inform potential buyers that the property has a crime history.
Many agencies do inform the potential buyers though due to having been sued by the new owners claiming that they never would have purchased the property and/or lost money when finding out about the crime and sold the property.
Could someone have purchased RH's jeep not knowing it was his because it wasn't advertised as such and then sued AE/agent for not disclosing it had been his?
They would have found out from the bill of sale.
She could have transferred the jeep out of the Huermann/Ellerup name and then donated it to a non-profit organization that traveled on rough terrain.
Like she needs a few thousand dollars after her Peacock deal?
IMO