Charlie09
Former Member
- Joined
- Feb 26, 2009
- Messages
- 8,862
- Reaction score
- 31,873
WOW, yet another reason to keep religion out of government...
Really?
WOW, yet another reason to keep religion out of government...
Interview with one of the pardoned murderers. He says it was all an accident. Not according to the court and the witnesses but apparently the governor bought it. Further, he says that it's tradition that once you get into the governor's mansion (and get the opportunity to sweettalk him) you're a free man.
http://ac360.blogs.cnn.com/2012/01/13/video-exclusive-pardoned-mississippi-killer-speaks/?hpt=ac_mid
"Ozment already proved he can't live in our society, by our rules," said John Champion. "He committed the ultimate act by taking somebody's life, so, no, he should never be out," he said.
"I didn't want him to identify me or the other guy, so I shot him twice. ... I shot him in the head," Ozment said in the police confession.
Ozment said his share in the robbery was "between 50 and 60 dollars."
"When he was shot, and he fell to the ground, they said he was begging for help. ... You can't imagine how that feels," said McAbee, Montgomery's sister, as she began to cry.
"He has no obligation to do anything. He's been pardoned. He's a free man," said Barbour.
Found but all they can do is serve him. He doesn't have to comply.
http://www.cnn.com/video/?hpt=hp_c2#/video/us/2012/01/30/cooper-podcast-monday.cnn
AC360: Keeping Them Honest
Interesting video. Very interesting.
Everyone knows these weren't crimes of passion. Even the governor. He's just trying to cover his rear end.
I don't believe for one minute the governor consulted with Tammy Ellis' family. These people are still grief stricken and would have NEVER consented to Gatlin's early release.
And even if they were "not likely to commit another crime," they committed this one and were sentenced to prison...so in prison they should have stayed. Or should we have just stood over the body and told the family, "Oh well, 'studies' show he's not likely to commit another crime, so we'll just let him go on his merry way?" Is that what we should have done, Guvnah?I also have no clue as to what studies supposedly show that if a person commits so-called "crime of passion" they are not likely to commit another crime.
Of all the pardons issued by Mr. Barbour, the case involving Harry R. Bostick, first disclosed by a blogger in Oxford, Miss., Tom Freeland, may be the most confounding.
Mr. Bostick, a former criminal investigator for the I.R.S., was sentenced in May 2010 for his third drunken driving offense — a felony — and ordered into treatment.
Several former government lawyers and law enforcement officers who worked with him on federal tax prosecutions submitted letters on his behalf. In one, a former United States attorney, Jim Greenlee, argued that Mr. Bostick had reversed his destructive course of conduct. “He now fits the criteria and meets the human factors that make his pardon a wise decision,” Mr. Greenlee wrote.
In October, Mr. Bostick, 55, was arrested again for drunken driving, this time in an accident that left an 18-year-old waitress dead. The waitress, Charity Smith, was working at Cracker Barrel to save money for college. On a Friday night, her Buick collided with Mr. Bostick’s truck.
Mr. Bostick was charged with his fourth D.U.I. On Jan. 10, he was pardoned for his prior felony D.U.I. by Mr. Barbour.