His mouth was taped - he was mumbling in phone call to a neighbourEqually, if your hands were tied, you might try using your teeth to untie/bite through the string.
(But if only your nose is free from tape, that wouldn’t be possible)
His mouth was taped - he was mumbling in phone call to a neighbourEqually, if your hands were tied, you might try using your teeth to untie/bite through the string.
(But if only your nose is free from tape, that wouldn’t be possible)
So... I was right - you must use your teeth. It means saliva on the string. And saliva is distinct DNA.
I think the poor baby's whereabouts is a top secret - for her safety. I also think the best place for her (for the time being) is with her maternal granny because of striking resemblance between C and her mother. It might soothe the girl's longing for her Mommy. My heart breaks for sweet little Lydia.I know I keep returning to this, but I don’t think anyone’s been to properly answer (sorry if I’ve missed it in an earlier thread).
Is Lydia being cared for by B or by someone else?
I appreciate he has not been named as a POI, but given AK’s comments about widening the scope of the investigation, if the baby is still with B, that to me speaks volumes about where this case is going - if there was even the slightest doubt the baby could be in danger, LE wouldn’t take the risk. B is also a key witness so surprised he’d not under police protection too, but they could be watching/guarding his house undercover JIMO
The LE Brigadier's initials are AK, so I'll refer to him by that for convenience.
3:20 AK: In regard to the hypnotherapist, the "framing" of the (criminal) investigation must go everywhere. Literally everywhere. Because there are so many gaps . . . so many answers (to unanswered questions) are needed.
4:30 newsman: we had heard (news reports) of a struggle (between the victim and the alleged perpetrator), but no DNA was found on her nails. The crime scene is sparse of genetic material. AK: (correcting the newsman's characterization of the crime scene as "sparse") They say: "nonexistent." Nonexistent. At least that's what I've heard and if it's accurate. Crime scenes "speak", but this crime scene, however, is "speechless."
5:15 newsman: "experienced" robbers enter (to break in) but don't even have string or tape (to bind and restrain victims), and yet the only prints (implying fingerprints here I would think) belong to the husband. AK agrees that this is an issue.
5:30 AK: there's also an additional question from my perspective, "for what reason would robbers, who commit a robbery and a murder, take the memory cards from the cameras?" They (robbers who operate in the standard modus operandi of robbers) "grab them (the cameras) and go." Removing the memory cards is a time-consuming process. A robber does his damage (whatever damage he inflicts on the victims), and leaves. (implying a robber isn't going to sit around and take the time to remove memory cards from cameras).
6:20 newsman: Do you think that things might be different than the version of things that we've been getting from the crime editors (in the general media) AK: Yes, I believe so.
newsman: Don't tell us details. Are the investigations going in a different "framing" (of the case)? AK: The "framing" (of the case) has widened/broadened. newsman: widened in regard to persons? AK: To persons. That's my assessment/evaluation. I hope that I'm wrong.
7:40 AK: Another thing that made an impression on me was that from the hypothesis that they (the alleged perpetrators) found this money, once they were informed about it, BUT without there being any disarray in the space/environment (where it was located). This is very important and must be investigated. And besides that, there wasn't any general disarray in the rest of the house.
8:00 AK: And the most important: everyone who knows about dogs knows that when strangers enter into (a dog's territory) he'll raise/whip-up a fuss (and cause a commotion by barking). Here what happened? How'd they catch the dog? How'd they tie the dog? How'd they hang dog? And the next door neighbor lady heard nothing (no barking, etc.)?
8:30 newsman: answer me this one question, did CC defend herself or not? AK: if she defended herself there would be signs, but here we have no such signs. No scratches, no bruising of her skin*, no DNA on her nails.
*ecchymosis: a discoloration of the skin resulting from bleeding underneath, typically caused by bruising. (Oxford dictionary)
So...If I understood correctly (mind the mechanic translator, police connect 2 robberies (C and B house, another pilot house). And in these 2 cases there is the same perp (short, stocky and with "honey" coloured eyes) and whose mask fell off TWICE!
I have only 1 comment: Justice for Caroline!No comment?
Door NR 1 : The same gang really has been robbing both pilot’s houseSo...If I understood correctly (mind the mechanic translator, police connect 2 robberies (C and B house, another pilot house). And in these 2 cases there is the same perp (short, stocky and with "honey" coloured eyes) and whose mask fell off TWICE!
I know I keep returning to this, but I don’t think anyone’s been to properly answer (sorry if I’ve missed it in an earlier thread).
Is Lydia being cared for by B or by someone else?
I appreciate he has not been named as a POI, but given AK’s comments about widening the scope of the investigation, if the baby is still with B, that to me speaks volumes about where this case is going - if there was even the slightest doubt the baby could be in danger, LE wouldn’t take the risk. B is also a key witness so surprised he’d not under police protection too, but they could be watching/guarding his house undercover JIMO
I'd say it depends on the identity of the murderer, which, in turn, might provide insight into the motive for her murder.Is it thought that CC’s murder was the prime reason for events that night, or a spontaneous consequence?
Like in the Maya Millete case, many worry about the children being hurt before arrests are made, but they have no right to remove children from a home before they have gathered the evidence they need to prosecute someone.I know I keep returning to this, but I don’t think anyone’s been to properly answer (sorry if I’ve missed it in an earlier thread).
Is Lydia being cared for by B or by someone else?
I appreciate he has not been named as a POI, but given AK’s comments about widening the scope of the investigation, if the baby is still with B, that to me speaks volumes about where this case is going - if there was even the slightest doubt the baby could be in danger, LE wouldn’t take the risk. B is also a key witness so surprised he’d not under police protection too, but they could be watching/guarding his house undercover JIMO
Since the hypnotherapist is now a POI, I'm permitted to post this here.
This is a media interview with the "President of the Greek Psychological Association."
She says that the hypnotherapist has neither the university degree nor the professional license to practice which are required in order for her to declare herself a psychologist. Under Greek law these two requirements are needed to declare oneself as a psychologist. She talks with the newspersons about how a real psychologist is forbidden to go on TV and make disclosures about the confidential relationship between psychologist and patients, and reveal details about their life and the case. The newsman asks her if they intend to file a lawsuit against the hypnotherapist, and she says that they certainly will do so.
My phone auto-translates this into English as;