GUILTY - Sidney Moorer, Obstruction of Justice Trial, Heather Elvis case, 28 Aug 2017 #1

Status
Not open for further replies.
  • #121
Thankfully over ruled but now I'm curious where he was going.

He was trying to "prove" that Furr doesn't have a good memory.
 
  • #122
WPDE ABC15‏Verified account @wpdeabc15

Det. Scales said Moorer met with officers outside. They were investigating missing person case. He was not under arrest, never cuffed
 
  • #123
Anyone know "who" that is sitting in front with the suspenders??
 
  • #124
You would think that woman giving the oath would wear something appropriate for work.... :dunno: JMO! :)

I missed that, will have to check it out next time she comes on the screen.

I want someone to tell the guy in the bright blue tee shirt that his shirt is INSIDE OUT!
 
  • #125
K must have missed something - the judge just got up and left? Jury must be out, right?
:crazy:
 
  • #126
Taylor Herlong WBTW @taylor_herlong

The state is presenting a CD with the dash cam video of the conversation between Moorer and Scales when he responded in 2013.

Judge is going to give jury a break before watching the dash cam video.
 
  • #127
He's trying to get facts thrown out based on stupid little details. :moo:

The details matter in an obstruction case or any case. Locals know this police department has major issues with the truth with other things going on and lots of lawsuits and firings. KT knows what he is doing. I'm not on the side of the defense but lots of his questioning makes complete sense for the area.
 
  • #128
I missed that, will have to check it out next time she comes on the screen.

I want someone to tell the guy in the bright blue tee shirt that his shirt is INSIDE OUT!


:laughcry: I missed that one - will have to look!


edited to add - just looked - yup - inside out! LOL!
 
  • #129
You would think that woman giving the oath would wear something appropriate for work.... :dunno: JMO! :)

some more tweets:

Next witness called by the state: HCPD Detective Brian Scales...but was a patrolman (road officer) at the time of Heather's disappearance

Scales was contacted by Officer Canterbury to respond with him to question Moorer at his home for missing person case

The conversation between Scales, Canterbury, another officer, and Moorer was recorded

At the time, officers believed Moorer was the last person to have spoken to Heather


from https://twitter.com/kaitlinstansell?lang=en

I honestly thought the same thing and then giving her the benefit of the doubt, she should have at least paid attention to the docket and known THIS case was on for today and would be streaming/taped etc.

IMO
 
  • #130
The details matter in an obstruction case or any case. Locals know this police department has major issues with the truth with other things going on and lots of lawsuits and firings. KT knows what he is doing. I'm not on the side of the defense but lots of his questioning makes complete sense for the area.

What DVD he rented/watched a week later is not relevant, IMO. What he does on his own personal time is his business.
 
  • #131
Regarding inside out t-shirt guy:

They made some of the ladies turn their shirts inside out b/c they had on Heather shirts. Consider it a rumor b/c I read it on the MCD FB page but I believe it to be true. He could be with them or wearing something they didn't want allowed in the court room.

Bless those women who went daily to the other trial and are there in support of Heather again now. IMO
 
  • #132
The details matter in an obstruction case or any case. Locals know this police department has major issues with the truth with other things going on and lots of lawsuits and firings. KT knows what he is doing. I'm not on the side of the defense but lots of his questioning makes complete sense for the area.

I understand. thank you.
 
  • #133
What DVD he rented/watched a week later is not relevant, IMO. What he does on his own personal time is his business.

yes but the difference in talked to or seen is relevant. He can remember the that but can't remember what he did the next day is the point. KT wants the jury to catch the talked to part. That is important here. Again I'm not defending the Moorers just saying that pros is saying SM lied and defense is saying he answered the question asked.
 
  • #134
Well the live stream stopped for me - I'll keep the tweet open, and going to go over to Savanna in No. Dakota case as that starts in a few minutes. See if I can find something on that one.

Plus it's getting late here....

:seeya:
 
  • #135
yes but the difference in talked to or seen is relevant. He can remember the that but can't remember what he did the next day is the point. KT wants the jury to catch the talked to part. That is important here. Again I'm not defending the Moorers just saying that pros is saying SM lied and defense is saying he answered the question asked.

Yes, I understand what you're saying and why they attempted to prove his memory sucked. If I were a juror I wouldn't place too much stock in "seen" and "talked" to since it was a report written by a third person. An innocent person would have said immediately, "I haven't seen her since October, but we did speak last night."
 
  • #136
Well the live stream stopped for me - I'll keep the tweet open, and going to go over to Savanna in No. Dakota case as that starts in a few minutes. See if I can find something on that one.

Plus it's getting late here....

:seeya:

Still working for me here: http://wpde.com/live/event
 
  • #137
  • #138
I really I wish i could here the tape!!!!! too garbled....
 
  • #139
i hope the jurors hear this recording better than we can. i can't understand anything being said.
 
  • #140
WPDE ABC15 @ Twitter

The jurors are now watching the tape that Det. Scales says records his conversation with Sidney Moorer.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Members online

Online statistics

Members online
112
Guests online
2,612
Total visitors
2,724

Forum statistics

Threads
632,543
Messages
18,628,259
Members
243,192
Latest member
Mcornillie5484
Back
Top