No actually I don't comprende. I asked for the twists, turns, ups and downs of which you are speaking as I haven't seen any evidence of them either in the press, by way of press releases or from factually based opinion. HTH
Associates?? Are we now suggesting that MB, SS, JS, SB and three alleged deceased individuals are somehow connected to the case other than being deceased, a mother, friend, girlfriend or wife?
As I recall, when the subject has be raised previously that maybe SS or AS were possibly connected to the case it was dismissed. MB, JS have never been implicated in anything, from what I have read.Please can you clarify what you mean TIA
Vehicle thefts don't seem to be a part of any of the cases. Someone closing up shop in regard to their business seems quite a normal thing especially when you consider that the company appears to have been being sabotaged in some way, just my opinion of course but still a possibility IMO. I see not too many twists and turns and that has been the problem for me. Everything was too neatly pointing to one person, eerily and suspiciously so as a matter of fact in my opinion.
As for MS, we may well find out that the guns had more to do with him than DM and that he used his friends (DM) properties, cell phone and vehicles as he did the Maple Court address, either that or someone(s) else did. KWIM?
With the constant unnecessary (IMO) focus on an apparently non existent chop shop, it often becomes negligible when talking about the black pickup belonging to TB. JMO. Thank you for the invite to read past posts but I have done already, without the prompt. The word used was thefts not theft on my part as it followed on from Swedies post which also said thefts (plural) HTH
We also have no idea whether the TB truck was stolen or by who. The focus always seems to be on DM, but I believe there is another accused and a felon sitting in the wings selling everything from drugs to guns. I guess the details will be revealed in due course. JMO
Don't chop shops like to get vehicles in and out ASAP? How many vehicles had come and gone from the hangar, leaving as few as ten when LE made the discovery?
Seems the chop shop was a fairly new business for DM, which IMO seemed to have started some time after WM's murder...so three to five months production? Oh BTW when reporters said "giant", pretty sure they meant the size of the building, not the amount of vehicles and parts within. Here are a couple of the numerous links on the subject of the chop shop. HTH and MOO.
I think you will find it says it was less than ten, (possibly one or even zero ?). MM's Harley is quite an enigma in my opinion. What did LE discover? Wasn't it just the alleged dismantled Harley?
There is no evidence of a chop shop, no charges for such either. Just claiming one existed is not enough to claim as a fact IMHO. As yet WM death is a suicide. 3-5 months production of what ?? just a nice clean hangar with no evidence of any chop shop !
Had any stolen vehicles been found we would have heard far more about it that that somewhat dated press article IMO. No charges laid for anything, not even the alleged dismantled uninsured Harley from what I can tell.
To the point, plan and simple...This case is very complex as opposed to the peppers and cocaine one which RP won. "Associates"... knowing or having a connection by my definition. HTH.
BTW vehicle thefts do seem to be connected to this case: the theory TB was murdered for his truck, the HD and its trailer found in the hangar.
Hmm, sabotaged business. You're obviously speaking of DM. He's the one who refused to comply with recommendations cleaning up his toys, allowing potential clients to be brought in to view the hangar in order to set up a business deals, sign contracts. BTW AS had contracts in hand IIRC. Closing up business is not the norm when someone signs a big contract for 25 years and especially when the business didn't even get under way...not normal.
Typically people sign those contracts when a business looks promising. WM was hopeful but DM saw it as a responsibility he didn't want because it would require too much ambition on his part. It was all about the money to carry on his carefree lifestyle, all play and no work
DM neatly pointed everything in his direction. Not such a smart idea when one is hoping to get away with murder. He figured he got away with two murders but didn't plan the third very well or he simply ran out of time. Burner phone, cover of darkness, his little hideaway in the country, the incinerator to make someone disappear (suggestively LB, and DM had hoped TB also), hiding TB's truck in his trailer and dumping it at his mother's until he felt the heat was off and safe enough to take it back to the hangar to start the chopping process. Just think, another week or so DM could have erased most of the trail he left.
What's really eerie is, according to his track record, three murders in approximately nine months. Had DM not been caught, by my calculations, DM may have had eight or more victims by now. :scared: Is this what he referred to when he said "For heaven sakes, it's right in front of everyone's face and no one seems to be able to figure it all out!?"? Was he saying there are more victims people/LE haven't connected him with?
We've recently had discussion covering the no charges/chop shop issue. Check out the other thread. HTH.
Could this be a figment of my imagination, your enigma? Is the photo and information lying? I guess everyone could be lying. All just to frame DM because after all everyone has something against him. Everyone is out to get DM for God know whatever reason. Maybe it's his millions or his hangar or just because everyone is jealous that he was a failure in so many aspects of life? Respectfully, what do you suspect everyones motives are to see DM suffer the rest of his life in prison? MOO.
View attachment 78150http://www.torontosun.com/2013/05/30/stolen-harley-found-on-property-of-accused-tim-bosma-killer
http://www.torontosun.com/2013/05/30/stolen-harley-found-on-property-of-accused-tim-bosma-killer
WM's death has been now ruled murder and DM is charged with his father's murder. HTH. Just because the evidence hasn't been presented in court, doesn't mean it's not real or we cannot believe what's in the MSM. MOO.
.
(modsnip)
Any vehicle (singular) that is stolen and dismantled is "Chopped" .... one is all it takes to fulfill the definition , and whether it is done in a basement , a small garage , or a huge hangar does not matter , it can properly be called a "Chop Shop"
And in Dellen's case we know he had at least two stolen vehicles , the motorcycle and Mr Bosmas truck which most likely would have been dismantled if not for that pesky murder charge that got in the way.
And it does not matter who did the dismantling , a hireling , a mechanic , the thief , or DM himself , the fact remains a stolen and chopped vehicle was found on premises owned by DM
The only thing yet to be determined is whether it was a small volume Chop Shop or a large volume Chop Shop
There have been no charges in regard to a chop shop. I have to disagree Arnie that all it takes for a chop shop is one dismantled vehicle. To me, thats like saying all you have to be to be a coffee shop is sell one cup of coffee or to be a toy shop you need only sell one Iggle Piggle. IMO
We do not know that DM stole anything, imo. It is very likely that DM had nothing to do with the HD and at this point we do not know the full story behind the Bosma truck. It is difficult to separate fact from fiction when stories are embellished from the actual basic facts ( limited as they are) of the case. IMO.
A jury will be extremely interested in who actually did what in regard to the case.I think it will be an integral part of the trial. People (juries) will hopefully be comprised of people who work with fact and will be able to separate that fact from embellishments by the Crown and all media. Hopefully ! MOO
Definition.— For purposes of this section, the term “chop shop” means any building, lot, facility, or other structure or premise where one or more persons engage in receiving, concealing, destroying, disassembling, dismantling, reassembling, or storing any passenger motor vehicle or passenger motor vehicle part which has been unlawfully obtained in order to alter, counterfeit, deface, destroy, disguise, falsify, forge, obliterate, or remove the identity, including the vehicle identification number or derivative thereof, of such vehicle or vehicle part and to distribute, sell, or dispose of such vehicle or vehicle part in interstate or foreign commerce.
So when does a coffee shop become a coffee shop? How many cups of coffee do they have to sell? Are they not a coffee shop on their first day? Or do they have to meet a certain threshhold of coffee sold to become a coffee shop? What is that magic number that turns a restaurant into a coffee shop?
I think if they INTEND to sell coffee, they are a coffee shop, and they don't even have to be selling coffee at that moment - they just have to have the intent to sell coffee.
I too think who actually did what in regard to the case will be an integral part of the trial. In fact, that may be a definition of a trial.
Certain people would not be admitted to the jury though. If someone has a rigid preconceived notion that DM is innocent, they will not be selected to serve on the jury. Unfortunately, I think the jury will share more in common with the majority here than with you, Tamarind. Your blind enthusiasm for DM would prevent you from serving on the jury.
The U.S. definition of a chop shop...
https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/18/2322
I can't imagine that Canada's definition is much different. The only stolen and dismantled items that we know of that were found in the hanger were the Harley and it's trailer. Since it was still there in pieces a year later, I guess it wasn't much of a chop shop IMO.
As for the coffee shop, IMO it wouldn't be much of a coffee shop either if it had only sold one cup of coffee. And I wouldn't be at all surprised if the proprietor of that coffee shop chose to cut costs and dismantle the business if the business development consultant couldn't manage to bring in any new business. Should the coffee shop remain open with no customers just because someone thought it was a good time and a good place? How long should that proprietor continue to lose money before deciding the plan just wasn't working?
JMO
Well as long as we're talking facts, the facts are that TB went on a test drive with two men, identified as DM and MS, in his truck. Neither TB nor his truck returned home. TB's burned remains were found in an incinerator owned by DM on property owned by DM. His STOLEN truck was found, seats removed, in a trailer owned by DM dropped off in the driveway of DM's mother. Put there by a vehicle with the proper 5th wheel trailer hitch to haul that large trailer, something DM also owned.
That truck was hidden somewhere else before it showed up in MB's driveway. I think we can all guess where LE have discovered the hidden location may have been. The Harley (in pieces) and trailer (illegally registered as a homemade one) which had been stolen about 6 months earlier, were also found in a hangar owned by DM. At the time LE suspected several other vehicles were stolen and in various forms of "chopping". We've seen the pictures of the various parts and engines all over the old hangar. SS, an automobile mechanic, was an "employee" of DM. For what? Why was SS employed by DM? And what was "business as usual" after DM was arrested?
The fact is, after over 2 years of investigating, only DM is facing a charge of Theft Over $5000. Do LE need to add a count for each item found in his possession or does that cover the broad "chop shop" possibility? And if they can't prove who stole the property in the hangar but want to charge someone with simple possession, then that would also be DM. They haven't done that either. So perhaps the charge that has been entered is enough to cover the whole vehicle aspect of this case.
Personally, I've never really subscribed to the "chop shop" theory as far as why there were vehicles and parts in the hangar and why they wanted a Dodge Ram truck with a specific engine at that particular time. In everything I've read, in order to do a conversion to a diesel engine in a truck like DM's red one, you'd pretty much need a whole vehicle for all the parts required. The Baha race was coming up, time was of the essence, and why pay 25 grand for something when you can just take it? Makes it all that more interesting and thrilling to get something for nothing. Same with the Harley. Maybe it was just the trailer he wanted and he got the Harley as a bonus. The ultimate move for a frugal guy. While all the stealing and chopping/altering may have only been for personal use, it's still illegal.
MOO
For all we know, one of the hangar elves might have taken some parts of the Harley home to his own garage in order to work on them. LE would then have more dirt on him than DM and could threaten the elf with charges if he did not testify against DM. So, no charges in exchange for the elf's testimony.
I think the chop shop was a hobby not a business, more of a lemonade stand than a coffee shop.
I think DM was developing a criminal lifestyle, and thought of himself as quite a master criminal because he had daring. He casually crossed every moral line. The stolen Harley is just one small thing in a larger general pattern. IMO.
If you can use one charge to cover other similar crimes, every criminal would want that deal. Steal as many things as you want and only face one count and one charge? That would just encourage crime sprees, realistically, like an all you can eat crime buffet.
As it is pointed out above, LE may have suspected a chop shop in the beginning, but have had over 2 years to investigate and still did not see fit to press charges against DM for the theft of the Harley, the trailer or any other vehicles. If LE can't prove who did it but want to charge someone anyway, why didn't they already? We know know that LE knows the name of the person that the trailer was registered to when it was stolen, and still DM was not charged with stealing it. That would lead people to believe that either DM wasn't the one that it was registered to, or that LE are incompetent, and I choose to believe the first option, personally.
The photos of cars and trucks in pieces were photos from another place and another time, they do not represent the MillardAir hanger in 2012 in any way. The photos of the new hanger looked completely different, gleaming and sparse. It would be quite a leap to say that the older photos of a different location are more representative and relevant than the new photos of the actual place, in my opinion.
Wasn't SS also employed while WM was still alive and no doubt a regular attendee at the hanger? To insinuate that DM was running a chop shop with someone who is not named as a suspect in anything is a bad enough accusation, but that would also mean that WM had to have been in on it too, since it was happening right under his nose for years, and in different locations, according to this insinuation.
If business as usual happened when WM was still alive, continued after his death, and was reinstated a few days after DM was arrested, in full view of LE who were no doubt continuing their investigation at the time, I doubt that 'business as usual' had been at all nefarious. LE would not have allowed an illegal business to continue as usual, that wouldn't make sense.
I'm curious why anyone would want to convert one vehicle to another nearly identical vehicle if you would need pretty much a whole new vehicle for all the parts, when it would be far easier just to trade in one for the other without going through all the intensive physical labour and expense involved? Especially if time was of the essence. Chopping and altering vehicles is not illegal, just the stealing part is.
The facts remain that there is no proof of a chop shop at the hanger and no charges related to a chop shop involving DM that we know of.
All my opinion only, again, except for the facts.