It is settled law, in a Supreme Court case decided in 1987, that:
the First Amendment protects a significant amount of verbal criticism and challenge directed at police officers. "Speech is often provocative and challenging. . . . [But it] is nevertheless protected against censorship or punishment, unless shown likely to produce a clear and present danger of a serious substantive evil that rises far above public inconvenience, annoyance, or unrest."
http://caselaw.lp.findlaw.com/script...=482&invol=451
It seems to me that any veteran police officer (and one who teaches classes about racial profiling at that) should know that saying Pig or yo mama or This is an outrage is protected speech.
This was no case of "clear and present danger or serious substantive evil"- it was just public inconvenience (at a very minor level), annoyance (to the cop), and as for unrest, I dunno. The small crowd gathered to watch Gates' humiliation didn't seem to jump into action. The policeman made a mistake, which he shouldn't have. Gates took umbrage, as he was legally entitled to. Police aren't supposed to arrest people for hurting their feelings, or swearing at them, or even insulting their lovely mothers.
What happened here was a case of a cop overstepping his authority.
Will anyone tell me why Professor Gates was a danger or an evil in this case? He was just a citizen, grumpy about being dissed by a cop. And if Sgt Crowley was afraid of a frail man 20 years his senior...Well.
Yes, and ideally, Prof Gates should have just kept his yap shut and it would have all ended quickly and well. But he didn't do anything illegal or even wrong.
Your right there are many people that continue to be racist. I never said that racism didn't exist. Sure people of all colors us their looks and education to their advantage. But you never hear a white man screaming that he was arrested because he is white. Gates was arrested because he wouldn't cooperate not because of the color of his skin. Yet he is claiming he was arrested soley because of the color of his skin. He won't admit that his actions had anything to do with it. That is why the issues of skin color will never die.
Did anyone already post that the woman was not even a neighbor but some woman out on a lunch break?
It is settled law, in a Supreme Court case decided in 1987, that:
Will anyone tell me why Professor Gates was a danger or an evil in this case? He was just a citizen, grumpy about being dissed by a cop. And if Sgt Crowley was afraid of a frail man 20 years his senior...Well.
Yes, and ideally, Prof Gates should have just kept his yap shut and it would have all ended quickly and well. But he didn't do anything illegal or even wrong.
Gates says this isn't about him at all and he will use it to improve fairness in the criminal justice system. I disagree. It IS about him. If he had behaved himself and had not started using the race card when it had nothing to do with profiling black men, this would never have happened. He is trying to use this for his cause which is a just one, but this does not apply. A neighbor called because someone was seen breaking into his house and LE responded. I can't see that his attitude has changed much.
Perhaps the reason you never see a white man saying he was arrested for being white is because it never happens and never has!
White men don't have the historical experiences that Blacks do of being arrested, jailed and convicted based on their color.
Statistically speaking, blacks commit more crimes than whites, or hispanics, based upon incarceration rates.
Although there may be some cases of people being convicted wrongly (i.e. based upon their color), the numbers can't be this far off. Numbers don't lie.
The statistics:
http://www.ojp.usdoj.gov/bjs/prisons.htm
Just stating the facts.
First, the Sargeant went there because of a suspicious person/burglary in progress. When Gates came to the door, the prudent thing to do is to get him out of the house to talk. Why? Because he could be in danger, as in a perp inside the house, holding a gun to him or a loved one. Or, the perp could be hiding in the house, unbeknownest to Gates.
When Gates acted like an azz and said he was gong back int eh house to get his ID, the officer followed him in. Why? Because if Gates was a nut job (which he was acting like) he could have returned with a gun.
All Gates had to do was to say, Thank you for coming, but it was me trying to get in my back door. There is no emergency, here is my ID. Sorry to have caused a false alarm.
But, instead he said "You're a racist", "you're just doing this because I am black", "this is what it is like to be a black man", "I'll talk to yo' mamma", "do you know who I am?" and who knows what other stupid things, all the while trying to get in touch with the police chief.
The guy is a professor. One would think he has better manners and social skills than he showed. But, he showed his azz, acting like a low rent.
Just because the charges were dropped doesn't mean Gates didn't do what he was arrested for. It just means that the DA wasn't going to prosecute the professor for a misdemeanor. He was given special treatment because of his status.
Anyone else would have had to answer the charges.
Personally, it has been my experience that Blacks are more prejudiced against Whites than the other way around. I have been the victim of racially motivated hate, physically attacked because I am White. My friend was shot and crippled for life by a Black man because she is White. We were both called racial slurs during the attacks.
I am sick of people pretending only Whites are capable of racism. Wake up. Gates made an azz of himself because of his preconceived notions of White police officers. That is called racism.
As a White person, I am tired of White people being blamed for the problems in the Black community and am insulted to be pre-judged as a racist because I am White.
I think the Black community would be surprised to know that MOST White people don't think about "race" when dealing with people. We deal with the person, not the race, and Black people are being mislead by others who have an agenda to keep people in a state of racial tension.
Actually, no. You cite facts (conviction rates) and then leap to an unsupported conclusion (that conviction rates fairly represent crimes committed).
We don't know the rate of wrongful convictions and I doubt you could get LE anywhere to allow such a rate to be accurately determined.
Prison stats only measure those who are incarcerated. To be incarcerated, one must be convicted, so at best, your stats reflect conviction rates, not crime rates.
Further, prison stats do not include those who are sentenced only to probation, fines or other non-prison punishments. Are the rates for these "light" sentences the same for all races? I doubt it.
We don't know how many people accused of crimes were allowed to enter rehab or some sort of pretrial intervention program that kept them out of prison.
Poor people are more likely to commit crimes. For a variety of historical reasons, African-Americans are more likely to be poor than other Americans.
Those who are less educated are more likely to commit crimes. I don't think I need to explain the state of many predominantly black schools in this country.
Laws and sentencing guidelines heavily punish blue-collar or street crime (more likely to involve blacks) relative to white-collar crimes.
Laws and sentencing guidelines heavily punish drugs used by the (often black) urban poor relative to drugs (including alcohol) favored by the white middle-class.
Etc. and so forth.
I don't think Gates was arrested for being black. I think he was arrested for being a pompous,arrogant,a**. I think his atitude comes more from being a Harvard professor than being of color.