Wudge
New Member
Mary Lacy's exoneration of the Ramsey's is on par with Mike Nifong being positive a gang rape occured....it's a worthless PR move that has nothing to do with actual evidence.
Lacy herself has previously said the unknown DNA could be from the killer or there could be an innocent explanation for it...I don't see how finding the DNA on the leggings changes that.
If you review the Duke Lacrosse case threads, you will find I called Nifong four to six months ahead of time; i.e., a corrupt prosecutor. As for a fruitcake, I always maintained Elizabeth Smart was abducted by a fruitcake too.
Regarding the DNA, the male DNA that was found with JonBenet's blood was baseline exonerating. However, the recent DNA testing found the DNA from that same man on two different places on JonBenet's leggings. It's not reasonable to believe the DNA from an unknown male innocently turned up on both her leggings and her underpants on the night she was sexually assaulted and murdered.
HTH