PeterThomasFan
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Dec 27, 2013
- Messages
- 2,186
- Reaction score
- 2,197
Witness testified his opinion is vehicle belonged to Moorers
Monday, April 18th 2016, 11:27 am EDT
Monday, April 18th 2016, 1:10 pm EDT
CONWAY, SC (WMBF) - One of the state's proposed expert witnesses began testifying Monday morning during a pre-trial hearing for Heather Elvis kidnapping suspect Sidney Moorer.
Grant Fredericks, who works in forensic video analysis, testified that he is a contract instructor at the FBI National Academy and has taught forensic video analysis in a number of countries.
During questioning by prosecuting attorney Nancy Livesay, Fredericks talked at length about reverse projection, which is the process of overlaying temporary images of a scene with historic images of a scene in order to make observations or to obtain measurements.
Headlight spread patterns were also discussed during the opening of Monday's hearing, which also came into play to identify a vehicle in question involved in this case, according to the witness.
Fredericks testified that he could not identify a truck related to the case without the use of this science. He said his opinion is the vehicle involved in the case did belong to the defendant.
[ ]
Monday, April 18th 2016, 11:27 am EDT
Monday, April 18th 2016, 1:10 pm EDT
CONWAY, SC (WMBF) - One of the state's proposed expert witnesses began testifying Monday morning during a pre-trial hearing for Heather Elvis kidnapping suspect Sidney Moorer.
Grant Fredericks, who works in forensic video analysis, testified that he is a contract instructor at the FBI National Academy and has taught forensic video analysis in a number of countries.
During questioning by prosecuting attorney Nancy Livesay, Fredericks talked at length about reverse projection, which is the process of overlaying temporary images of a scene with historic images of a scene in order to make observations or to obtain measurements.
Headlight spread patterns were also discussed during the opening of Monday's hearing, which also came into play to identify a vehicle in question involved in this case, according to the witness.
Fredericks testified that he could not identify a truck related to the case without the use of this science. He said his opinion is the vehicle involved in the case did belong to the defendant.
[ ]