I think (a) would apply in this case. Joshua would have been born by now if he and his mother had been allowed to live.
Unfortunately, I don't think Joshua is counted.

jmo
I think (a) would apply in this case. Joshua would have been born by now if he and his mother had been allowed to live.
According to a copy of the indictment obtained by The Associated Press, Capobianco intentionally or knowingly caused Scott's death "in an especially heinous, atrocious, or cruel manner, manifesting exceptional depravity" during the period from Feb. 9 to Feb. 13. During that period, he also set fire to Scott's property, the indictment said. The bench warrant sets bail at $2 million for the murder and arson charges.
http://www.hawaiinewsnow.com/story/...sing-pregnant-woman-indicted-on-murder-charge
Latest mugshot. What is around his neck?
How much child support would he have had to pay? I don't know if that was the motive but I can't think of any others.
How much child support would he have had to pay? I don't know if that was the motive but I can't think of any others.
Speculation amongst locals was he had a new infatuation at the time who was due to return to Maui later that February. Speculators also reported new infatuation had said she didn't want to be a stepmother. No one was blaming her.
Anyone know why the charge is 2nd degree murder and not 1st? Because the body's not been found? If that's the case then there is no incentive (just the opposite) for SC to give it up.
I thought 1st degree was premeditated.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
This picture is actually scary. The other pictures he looks sad, aloof, confused. This picture he looks sick, twisted, etc..
I googled "manifesting exceptional depravity".... ..... ... what the hell did he do to her? And the specific dates of 2/9 - 2/13 ??
I am literally sick to my stomach right now. With every fiber of my being I feel for the family and send strength and love their way.
My uncle was murdered, I know the road ahead is tough.
The Hawaii statute someone posted is really weird as unlike other states it seems like Hawaii lists only certain circumstances for first degree. In most states, it is just whether it was premeditated. I am not sure if that Hawaii statute is correct bc it seems odd that Hawaii would limit it like that
Needless to say, in most states penalties for first and second degree are the same or similar so hope that is the case w Hawaii
Legal Definition of Murder in New York and several other states:
Second Degree Murder: Any premeditated murder or felony murder that does not involve special circumstances.
First Degree Murder: Not only is the murder premeditated, but it also involves special circumstances, such as
- murder of a police officer, judge, fireman or witness to a crime;
- multiple murders; and
- torture or especially heinous murders.
Note that under this legal system, a "regular" premeditated murder, without such special circumstances, is not a first-degree murder; nor are murders by poison or "lying in wait" per se first-degree murders.
Murder in the First Degree is codified in §125.27 of the penal code and is a Class A-1 felony.
This charge in New York differs from some states in that not only must the defendant have INTENT to cause the death of someone with death resulting, at least one of twelve factors which are aggravating must be present for it to rise to level of first degree.
It will be really hard to prove first degree without some evidence of preplanning without a body. You can get first degree even if the planning is just minutes before. But here it will be hard to show that. It can be equally plausible that they got into a fight or perhaps he got jealous of something and he pushed her and she died.
They need more evidence to show he lured her out there for a nefarious purpose. If it was legit that his car broke down -or even if that is questionable- it will be really hard to prove intentional murder. They also need more evidence of his not wanting the baby- that can help show motive, which though not required, might be there only link to show that he intended to kill her.
The case boils down to the fact that there are just too many coincidences going on. If he did not do it who did? You would have to buy the claim that a random murderer just showed up and killed her when all this stuff is going down with him. Of course it does happen once in a blue moon, but 99 percent of cases of this sort end up w the likely suspect being the killer
For anyone that is interested ID discovery had this case on. On verizon they had it listed on demand as of a few weeks ago. I think it was an episode of Disappeared.