- Joined
- Oct 15, 2008
- Messages
- 5,658
- Reaction score
- 57,231
I love the guy but have only one complaint. Casey should NOT be allowed to wear street clothes in court. She is on trial for murder and she should be shackled and in jail garb.
I love the guy but have only one complaint. Casey should NOT be allowed to wear street clothes in court. She is on trial for murder and she should be shackled and in jail garb.
I think he's just doing his job. I'm one of those who don't think judges should be praised for doing their jobs properly. He seems to be pretty fair to both sides and to be following the laws. He's doing what he's supposed to do, IMO. That pleases me because so many judges don't play by the rules but I don't think he's a "great judge" because he is doing the right thing.
I agree to some extent. You should not receive excessive praise for doing what you were hired to do.
However, the law is so full of nuances, not to mention a high number of basic rules and regulations, and the risks are astronomical. In this case, a mistake could result in ICA being put to death or being set free in error.
Judge Perry obviously not only knows the law and the nuances, but he never stops studying, looking up references, and double-checking his own work.
That little extra says it all. It's a trait I'd want in my judge and my surgeon.
I hear ya! I just believe all the things you listed are a big part of a judges job (a surgeon's too for that matter) and if they don't do those things then there is a problem. I give him props for doing his job right, don't get me wrong, but I don't find any of it to be "extra".
Point taken. :seeya:
But, sadly, in today's world, much of it is considered "extra." Too many believe they have studied enough and know it all and start coasting to the finish line.
BBMI know zip about Judges so I'm simply expressing myself.
I expected JP to be tougher. For instance, when CM whined about his schedule not being respected (or something like that) in reference to having to get AH's depo on a Saturday morning; CM asked the Judge why should we respect her schedule? That sounded childish to me. AH works on a cruise ship and that's the way it is so why can't they just work with it instead of cry and whine about the inconvenience it's causing them? JB complained to the Judge that they'd have to get a hotel room for Friday night in order to be there on Saturday morning. Just do it. JP has been telling them all along that they may have to work nights and weekends in order to get the job done. Heck I've had to do that in far less important jobs.
IMO it's about time for JP to tell the defense to quit complaining and do their job - it's crunch time.
CM is acting childish imo when he complains. He should have stayed retired then. He's never had to put in extra hours on a case before? I don't get it - are they all that poor that they can't afford a hotel room? They don't seem very devoted to their professionalism imo.
I hope JP calls them on this type of behavior soon. JB is never up-to-date on the status of the case when he appears before the judge for the status hearings. That's wasting JP's time. I expected JP to have a more demanding attitude from the way he presented himself at first.
Also, when I rewatched the last hearing, I can't tell you how much I appreciate HHJP reigning in Baez's ramblings.
Not exact, but my quickie impression.
HHJP: How many experts are left to depose, Mr Baez?
Baez: My list, which I have the name of experts -'
HHJP: How many?
Baez: There's people from the blah blah blah...blah blah blah blah -
HHJP: How Many?
I love me some HHJP!
BBM
IMO, HHJP did exactly that: 'Remember Oct 31.' He said that after every whining excuse.
Even going so far as calling Oct 31 the drop dead date!
BBM.I think a two week extension for certain, extremely specific depositions,while setting a hard line on the bulk of them sends the perfect message. It shows the judge is fair and reasonable, he can where needed and truly appropriate, make adjustments to the trial schedule to best serve the needs of the court, the witnesses, and occasionally the defendant. But it also says that he is the one firmly in charge. This largess will be extremely limited in its frequency and extremely minimal in the amount of time extended. It keeps them on a tight schedule while leaving virtually no avenues for appeal. Precisely what he is there to do.
His decision on the touch DNA testing of the shorts is a teachable example of this. Yes the defense can test the shorts for DNA. To deny that would have been a huge issue on appeal. No the evidence may not leave the jurisdiction of the courts or US law. So the defense has to find an acceptable domestic lab to do the test... oh yeah and the deadline for experts is Oct 31.
Yeah, HHJP seemed a little crabby. He's even cuter when he's crabby, with his little crabby cherub cheeks.....Love me some Judge Perry.