It just really bothers me to hear him take apart GA the way that he did.
It does me also however it's important to listen to it to dissect what he said vs. what the defense will actually show during the trial to back it up.
It just really bothers me to hear him take apart GA the way that he did.
Nobody knows for sure what pictures the jury saw during LDB's opening. She (LDB) did state that on one side of the screen was the last known picture of Caylee (on Father's day) and then she says until December 11, 2008 - so everyone is assuming that that picture was shown to the jurors.When LDB gave the opening statements, is it true that the jury was shown pics of Caylee alive and the Caylee's skull? I heard that, but I find it hard to believe that the A's would not have some kind of reaction, or even KC would not have some kind of reaction.
Okay, I'm not that suprised that KC would not have a reaction. But she should have at least faked one.
When LDB gave the opening statements, is it true that the jury was shown pics of Caylee alive and the Caylee's skull? I heard that, but I find it hard to believe that the A's would not have some kind of reaction, or even KC would not have some kind of reaction.
Okay, I'm not that suprised that KC would not have a reaction. But she should have at least faked one.
I wonder if the "alternate ending"/ Blanchard Park Showdown story will come into play.
That, including this ridiculous defense (actually more ridiculous the second time I watched it) would make 3 CaseyWorld scenarios that I know of. And wasn't there a time when the A's were under the impression that some band of criminals had Caylee or knew something, and Casey couldn't speak of them because doing so would risk everyone's lives? Anyone remember something to that effect?
Oh, my head.
I caught the replay on HLN, I had watched it online before. I found it more ridiculous the second time around, and I wouldn't have thought that possible. During the week after, the State blows most of Jose's opening statements out of the water. :floorlaugh:
Impression left with this time: that Casey sat in jail for over two years over an accident? Jose is saying, this is not a murder :nono: this was an accident. Shouldn't he, as an attorney have done something about that? Is it okay for a attorney to let his client stay in jail for years on suspicion of murder when they know it was an accident? And, if Casey is as fragile as Jose wants us to believe, isn't he even more responsible? :innocent:
And it made me furious to hear Jose say that Roy Kronk was a "morally bankrupt man." When that is exactly how to describe his client, ICA-and after including the work a day man who found the remains into this nightmare, he can use to describe himself. :cow: