I have this crazy idea how you can eliminate the drug problem. It could really work, but it will NEVER happen LOL, tell me what you think. Forget about the obvious silliness of it, just if it will work.
I always believed that if you gave the cops a 10% bounty of all the cash recovered on a drug arrest and maybe 5% of the wholesale price of the drugs seized the drug trafficking would disappear like a bucket of steam on a cold night. You wouldn't have to give them overtime to pursue the drug dealers.
Back in my day the vice cops, we called them 'plainclothesmen' were always considered the cops that would make the best detectives. Those cops had a vested interest in finding gamblers to supplement their income. LOL. Trouble is when the cops found the gamblers they didn't arrest all of them. That gave rise to the Knapp Commission.
When I was assigned to the detective division I was assigned to the Manh. DA Sqd. I learned it was the practice of the office NOT to take on former plainclothesman It was tough enough to keep any cop honest and they certainly didn't want anyone that was already probably corrupted.
We had 2 detectives in our office. One guy could never shake off his time he spent undercover with the gangsters. He carried it forward. The bosses thought he was salvageable and so they assigned a straight arrow named AL to partner up with him hoping the straight arrow would influence the tainted guy. I guess you know what happened. It didn't work out the way boss wanted it.
I think we should remove the stigma that recreational drugs have. If grown adults want to smoke pot who am I to tell them they can't? They can't tell me I'm not aloud to have a beer. It's just insanity for people to think they should make decisions for other adults. Also it's not a new thing that a lot of the new drug problems are prescribed to people.
I have this crazy idea how you can eliminate the drug problem. It could really work, but it will NEVER happen LOL, tell me what you think. Forget about the obvious silliness of it, just if it will work.
I always believed that if you gave the cops a 10% bounty of all the cash recovered on a drug arrest and maybe 5% of the wholesale price of the drugs seized the drug trafficking would disappear like a bucket of steam on a cold night. You wouldn't have to give them overtime to pursue the drug dealers.
Back in my day the vice cops, we called them 'plainclothesmen' were always considered the cops that would make the best detectives. Those cops had a vested interest in finding gamblers to supplement their income. LOL. Trouble is when the cops found the gamblers they didn't arrest all of them. That gave rise to the Knapp Commission.
When I was assigned to the detective division I was assigned to the Manh. DA Sqd. I learned it was the practice of the office NOT to take on former plainclothesman It was tough enough to keep any cop honest and they certainly didn't want anyone that was already probably corrupted.
We had 2 detectives in our office. One guy could never shake off his time he spent undercover with the gangsters. He carried it forward. The bosses thought he was salvageable and so they assigned a straight arrow named AL to partner up with him hoping the straight arrow would influence the tainted guy. I guess you know what happened. It didn't work out the way boss wanted it.
As an adult and a mother, I would have no problem telling my adult children I dont want them smoking pot or doing any other drugs.
I always thought the way to get rid of the drug problem was to legalise them. The small percentage of the population who would abuse drugs would do it legally or illegally, but at least the drug business would not be an income source for the criminal enterprises.
I did some research about the Opium Wars in China between the British and the Chinese. The British fought to maintain the right to sell opium the the Chinese, so it was a war over profits.
According to the information I read, 25% of the adult male Chinese population was addicted to opium where the British had distribution control. So contrary to what I believed, human beings are not self-regulating when it comes to addictive and or illicit drugs; especially when there is a profit motive for the vendor.
Drug usuage will only decline when a) individuals realise that drug usage is not healthy,fun and enjoyable in the long term.
As long as people feel a enjoying joint or snorting a line is harmless we will have a drug problem.
MOO
As an adult and a mother, I would have no problem telling my adult children I dont want them smoking pot or doing any other drugs.
One question, just from curiosity. What will you tell the family of the victims of the Speed Freak Killers, what to the families of the victims of Coral Watts, what to the family of the victims of muggings driven by the need to finance the habit, what will you say to those victims who get raped by guys under the influence of their enjoyable drugs, what will you say to all of them after politics would follow your suggestion? Just curious.
Well that doesn't mean they have to listen to you. And I wasn't referring to telling our children. I mean if my neighbor wants to smoke a joint after work in the privacy of his own home who am I tell him he can't?
That already happens and some drugs are illegal. Let's not act like mass hysteria would happen with legalizing drugs. People who want to use drugs will seek them out whether they are legal or illegal. Why not take the control out of the drug cartels hands?
What do you say to people who lose their loved ones to drunk drivers, alcohol abuse, prescription drug abuse or any legal way to ruin your life? In my opinion the crime is probably worse because the drugs are illegal. Do you see drive by shootings because of bootlegging alcohol? Not anymore but when alcohol was prohibited there were incidents of people being killed over the control and sale of alcohol. Just like today when some drugs are illegal people are killed over the control and sale of them.
The top three criminal industries: Arms, drugs, sex-trafficking (I'm unsure of the order)
It's all about $$ and power. It's a sad world.
One question, just from curiosity. What will you tell the family of the victims of the Speed Freak Killers, what to the families of the victims of Coral Watts, what to the family of the victims of muggings driven by the need to finance the habit, what will you say to those victims who get raped by guys under the influence of their enjoyable drugs, what will you say to all of them after politics would follow your suggestion? Just curious.
As long as we generalize things so easily, we will find no solution. For example sex-trafficking and drug-trafficking are connected. On the other hand, arms is a two edged sword. In countries with harsher gun laws, explosives and C-weaponry has become very popular (see Japan and Sarin gas attacks for example). While the one country that demands by law that every male citizen has a weapon and even gives them the weapons (Swiss) has the lowest numbers in gun violence at all. So there are more things than just guns, maybe the way we treat the subject? Maybe some social consensus never spoken about?
I was just trying to put some levity into it and you guys get all serious with me. Fuggaditaboutit, it ain't gonna happen, i.e. a bounty for recoveries. There is a kind of bounty and that is overtime. Chump change thrown around like nickels and dimes. Funny thing about this funny solution I ran up the flagpole is it would probably work.
Peter I used the Opium Wars as an example why I am against leaglising drugs. Humans are not self-regulating.
I find it absolutely abhorent some states recently legalised marijuana use, it societal suicide.
Yes, we can go into more detail about these.
Yes, they can be related.
Yes, some unspoken consensus could be a factor.
I am certain I cannot provide a solution.
Finally, they still remain the top three criminal industries in the world and...
I still find it sad.