Hope Sykes arrested 1/20/2010

  • #661
FWIW IMHO--the sting may have been set up and the players caught were caught because they freely and willingly put together a drug deal. IMHO LE didn't set these ppl up in order to trap them about Haleigh. These ppl chose to focus on drug consumption and drug deals and drug trafficking while Haleigh is still out there somewhere. Is it beneficial that these players (you don't know how hard I'm biting my tongue here with the word players lol) are safe and secure and will perhaps start flapping their lips to cut deals to LE. In the words of Palin "you betcha!" :)


They were caught because someone was aware of their actions, made a point to let them do their own thing, and when opportunity arose, they got 'em. They were dealing dope on their own. LE knew this. What an opportunity!
 
  • #662
IMO, Hope understood her plea. If we had the transcript of the court minutes, we would see that the Judge would have made sure she understood her plea.

What Hope did know, IMO, was that cousin Ronald had plead nolo contendre' in one of his cases in the past. He did not serve jail/prison time. I think Hope knew that the PSI she waived would have been read by the Judge and he would have seen that she had been out of jail for only two weeks (possession) before getting arrested in this case. That would have been included in a PSI. As it stood, with waiving the PSI, the Judge could not take that into consideration as it was an arrest and not yet a conviction. Hope was in the vehicle when the pills changed hands and that makes everyone responsible to a degree for just having been there. Except for the UC officer, obviously.

Also, Hope will still have to go to court for her possession charge even if she is in prison. So she will have 15+ years unless it is time served.

Hope gambled and lost.

JMO

Thanks for explaining that! It still bothers me that someone can serve 15 years for dealing drugs but a child molester can serve less than five many times.
 
  • #663
The bust Tommy was caught in was fewer pills. The minimum for his charge is 3 years I think. I don't think he will do near the time the others are going to do.

3-5 IMO




I agree. I think he will get 3 years, but because he has cooperated with LE in Haleigh's disappearance, he will probably get probation. I don't think he knows anything about what happened that night, but I do think he offered his opinion as to where her body could be if Ronald and Misty were involved. He still has other charges pending, and he could do some time for the B&E's, and prior drug charges. It will be a minimal sentence. IMHO
 
  • #664
Earlier, my mouse stopped working. I was completely paralyzed for a while. Anyway, I thought that Hope's earlier charges, before the trafficing charges, were for possession. Ron pleaded NOLO at least three times for his earlier charges and did not see any sentence other than time served or one day. Are these other past charges for Hope that I'm not aware of? Before the trafficing charges?

She has outstanding possession charges--here's the one 2 weeks prior to THE big bust.

http://public.pcso.us/jail/bookingDetails.aspx?SYSID=758264&IMG=53175
 
  • #665
Maybe it's just me. I remember when the call was released how Hope sounded as if she didn't understand why her lawyer plead no-contest
and here we are today, she is facing 15yrs. I wonder if she will appeal and get new counsel? Yes, she may of signed documents stating she understood but what did she understand is the question? What did her attorney lead her to believe or what state of mind was she in when she was explained what no-contest meant? I agree, she should be punished for her crime. But when I see at all the monsters that kill and get 5-10yrs or the sex offenders who get a few years or probation, well it just makes me feel that our justice system is so corrupt. Not that I am defending Hope. Just saying, if they are going to give a dope head 15 yrs, they need to give killers and Sex Offenders worst sentences.




I feel the tape shows she did not understand what a plea of no contest meant for her. She may have grounds for appeal given plea of no contest was not entered into knowingly or voluntarily. If her attorney failed to inform her that her plea would result in mandatory minimum sentence of 15 years, this omission may constitute ineffective assistance of counsel. I am not familiar with FL statute, but I would check into this if I were her family. Any FL attorneys on Websleuths? Feel free to weigh in.

Please know, I feel she should be punished for her crime. But I also feel she deserves to have adequate legal representation. Was this a rookie attorney? :waitasec:

The judge told her what the possible sentences were.
Her attorney did her job.
Told her if she went to trial she could do 30.
Obviously told her about the other programs (which Hope clearly says she is not doing).

The attorney cannot make Hope's decision for her. Whining after the fact that you didn't expect to do fifteen years, and that no one likes you does not make for ineffective counsel. If you have a client (that is one of 300 court appointed clients) that does not want to listen or cooperate the best you can do is get them fifteen instead of thirty. If the attorney thought she would be acquitted at trial I am sure she would have told her that was her recommendation. Hope and her mother discuss what the attorney told her was likely to happen at trial.

“I’d rather go to f—ing prison! That’s f—ed up!” she tells her mother on the jail phone, calling collect after court Wednesday. “I’m not going to boot camp. I’ll tell you, they think I’m bad now, wait ‘til I get out of that!”

“Hope, you screw up on anything at this point in the game, you will get to do 15 years” in prison,” said Katrina Belcher.



But Sykes keeps griping, upset that her sentencing date has been pushed back “until the end of this f—ing month again!”


“It’s because there are too many criminals,” says Belcher.
“’Too many criminals’ my 🤬🤬🤬,” says Sykes. It’s because “people just don’t like us.”


“No, baby,” says her mother, “You’re lucky you go in April. Ron got May and Misty got June. You know Misty qualifies for the same thing you do?”
“I don’t see how,” says Hope.
Her mother says the judge doesn’t look as if he likes Misty, ‘that he ain’t got no use for her.”
“Did you see how he acted towards me?” asks Hope. “(If he asks,) if I got a job, I ain’t gonna stand up and say, ‘Yeah, I was a stripper.’ I aint gonna do it. He acted like he don’t like me either.”
Judge Larue “didn’t eyeball you like he was doing Misty,” she says.


“I didn’t plead ‘No Contest,’” says Hope. “My lawyer plead no contest.”
“The judge asked, ‘Do you understand, when I get ready to sentence you, you could be looking at mandatory 30 years years?’” says her mother.
“So…was I supposed to have plead ‘Not guilty?”
“You have to do what your attorney advised you to do, but I surely thought you understood. She sat there and talked to you…She said the cops had you. On the video, in the back, when you got back in the car, you had the pills in your hand.”

“I didn’t have no pills in my ****ing hand Hope explodes.
“Well, at one point in the game, according to what they got on video, you had pills in your hand.”
“NO!” Hope roars.
“You had pills in your hand…”
“BULL****! NO! Not at one point in the ****ing game did I have no pills. She must have got you ****ed up or something because there is no pills.”
Her mother says Ronald Cummings lawyer Terry Shoemaker said they’d seen the videos from the front and rear.
“They have me sitting in the back…” says Hope. “Didn’t anybody see I (had) pills in my hand from the front.”
“They have another video of you in the back,” says her mother.
“I watched the back view (camera),” spits Hope, “ and it only shows Misty having the ****ing pills because Misty cupped two pills, (claimed) the dope boys ****ed ‘em over.”
Suddenly her mother begins to wonder why her lawyer plead Hope if she claims she’s not guilty.
“I don’t understand why …either,” says Hope, “because they’re not going to pin no 15 years on no ****ing pill I ain’t touched.”
“Ronald (Cummings, Haleigh’s father) said he’d testify on your behalf,” says Belcher.
“He already did,” says Hope. “We’re 10 steps ahead of the ****ing game.”
 
  • #666
  • #667
I guess us Fl Residents will stop getting discounts to DisneyWorld we are going to have to build a WING for the Crosling/Cumming Convict's

You've probably been taking care of them more than you know already.
 
  • #668
Didnt Ron tell someone he already knew he was going to do at least 25 years for the drug charges?

I think he already knows he is getting a long prison term.

imo


Yes, he did. It's the younger ones who were naive, as younger ones usually are, consequences-wise. RC knew he could get into big trouble. Donna Brock certainly should have known, as did Tommy. They've gotten away with things for a long time and didn't expect to be caught. I consider the two girls (H & M) to be a little less aware at the harshness of punishment. Those over 21, with families, certainly should have known the consequences. What's really amazing is how these people did this knowing they were being watched because of Haleigh. Boggles the mind.
 
  • #669
Misty's got time to stew...
 
  • #670
  • #671
I missed this somewhere along the way and appreciate any response. Are these charges state or Federal? tia

State. They were busted by county/state agents and/or local LE. If the Feds had busted them, it would be Federal.

Although LaLaw says they are Federal. I don't know. I don't think they were in federal court, but county court.
 
  • #672
Her lawyer also told her she is on videotape, that there is considerable evidence, and that she has priors. If convicted at trial she could do up to 30 years.

You can also tell that they discussed other programs because Hope says she is not doing this and she is not doing that. She refers to it as boot camp, but clearly she was told there were other programs they could request and she refused them.

The lawyer can only tell her their opinion.
Hope is 19, mommy's opinion is irrelevant.
Following mom's legal advise is Hope's option.
And the judge asked her if she was knowingly and willingly entering the plea and did she understand the possible sentence. It is sad on many levels but she had ample opportunity to go down other avenues. Even if the lawyer told her to enter the no contest plea she could have told the judge this was her lawyer's decision and she really wants to stick with her not guilty and go to trial. That is why the defendant has to be in court and talk to the judge. He wouldn't have accepted the no contest if she had said other people had made the decision for her. She is not new to the court system.
I agree with your analysis. Hope seems to have a whole slew of relatives that have been in and out of the system and chose to listen to them instead of her attorney. If I was in trouble and my lawyer told me to pray for a good outcome I would seriously listen to what she had to say. And pray.
 
  • #673
Wow, what a family reunion planned for May 13th. And they all have the same judge, they must be sweating right now.
 
  • #674
Earlier, my mouse stopped working. I was completely paralyzed for a while. Anyway, I thought that Hope's earlier charges, before the trafficing charges, were for possession. Ron pleaded NOLO at least three times for his earlier charges and did not see any sentence other than time served or one day. Are these other past charges for Hope that I'm not aware of? Before the trafficing charges?

Ron takes a no contest on some of the non drug charges, I think it was the trespassing and hunting charges. On the drug charge he takes a deferred for treatment and therefor is not convicted for one batch, and is charged but not prosecuted for the ones the looooong list of drugs he was caught with (meth, ghb, cocaine, etc...). What deal he made to get those to not be prosecuted we don't know. But he never actually does a no contest to a serious drug charge.
 
  • #675
Judge LaRue is going to be real busy on May 13 with RC, TC, HC, LC. WOW
Mistys turn June 3.

Does anyone know what Donna's date is in St. Johns?

"Snip" http://doris.clk.co.st-johns.fl.us/...DONNA+MICHELLE&ps=50&m=name&s=4&caseid=192641

Case Number: 10000130CFMA Status: OPEN
Clerk File Date: 1/21/2010 Status Date: 1/21/2010
SAO Case No: (N/A) Total Fees Due: 0.00
Booking No: 100331
Agency: FDLE Custody Location: COUNTY JAIL
Judge
BERGER, WENDY W

Plaintiff Attorneys
STATE OF FLORIDA ROYS, JACQUELYN

Defendant Attorneys
BROCK, DONNA MICHELLE HINES, MICHAEL P

Charges: Disposition:
TRAFFICKING IN OXYCODONE (28 G - 30 KG) (893.135 1c1c) (N/A)

Case Number Party Type Charge Case Status Disposition Fees Due Next Court Event

Date Event Judge Location Result
6/21/2010 9:00:00 AM FELONY JURY TRIAL BERGER, WENDY W Courtroom 328
6/15/2010 9:00:00 AM FELONY DOCKET CALL BERGER, WENDY W Courtroom 328

4/6/2010 9:00:00 AM FELONY PRETRIAL BERGER, WENDY W Courtroom 328 CONTINUED
 
  • #676
Someone may need to remind her she will most probably be experiencing long-term consequences of menopause before she is ever released.. Perhaps then she will understand more fully...JMO

She would never have children of her own...
 
  • #677
Someone may need to remind her she will most probably be experiencing long-term consequences of menopause before she is ever released.. Perhaps then she will understand more fully...JMO

Emeralgem, I was going to laughingly agree with you that, that would possibly hit home... however, I'm sure that someone would have to explain menopause to her first... *smile*
 
  • #678
So this is where Hope came up with six years and the boot camp idea (which she clearly said she did not want to be a part of). This was entirely up to the judge's discretion and would have gotten her out of the minimum mandatory.





Alternative Sentencing: Youthful Offender Downward Departures

.fullpost{display:inline;} A “youthful offender” (YO) is any person who is sentenced as such by the court or is classified as such by the Department of Corrections pursuant to section 958.04.[FN1] There are two ways by which a defendant can become entitled to the benefits of the YO statute. Either the trial court can sentence the defendant as a YO, or the Department of Corrections can designate a defendant who was sentenced as an adult to be a YO.[FN2]

Qualification

Pursuant to section 958.04, F.S., the court may sentence as a YO any person:

(a) Who is at least 18 years of age or who has been transferred for prosecution to the criminal division of the circuit court pursuant to chapter 985;

(b) Who is found guilty of or who has tendered, and the court has accepted, a plea of nolo contendere or guilty to a crime that is, under the laws of this state, a felony if the offender is younger than 21 years of age at the time sentence is imposed; and

(c) Who has not previously been classified as a youthful offender under the provisions of chapter 985; however, a person who has been found guilty of a capital or life felony may not be sentenced as a YO under the Youthful Offender Act.

Sentencing Options

In lieu of other criminal penalties authorized by law and notwithstanding any imposition of consecutive sentences, the court is required to dispose of the criminal case as follows:

(a) The court may place a YO under supervision on probation or in a community control program, with or without an adjudication of guilt, under such conditions as the court may lawfully impose for a period of not more than 6 years. Such period of supervision may not exceed the maximum sentence for the offense for which the YO was found guilty.

(b) The court may impose a period of incarceration as a condition of probation or community control, which period of incarceration shall be served in a county facility, a Department of Corrections probation and restitution center, or a community residential facility that is owned and operated by any public or private entity providing such services. A YO may not be required to serve a period of incarceration in a community correctional center as defined in section 944.026, F.S. Admission to a Department of Corrections facility or center is contingent upon the availability of bed space, taking into account the purpose and function of such facility or center, and placement in such a facility or center may not exceed 364 days.

(c) The court may impose a split sentence whereby the YO is to be placed on probation or community control upon completion of any specified period of incarceration; however, if the incarceration period is to be served in a Department of Corrections facility other than a probation and restitution center or community residential facility, such period must be for not less than 1 year or more than 4 years. The period of probation or community control must commence immediately upon the release of the YO from incarceration. The period of incarceration imposed or served and the period of probation or community control, when added together, may not not exceed 6 years.

(d) The court may commit the YO to the custody of the Department of Corrections for a period of not more than 6 years, provided that any such commitment may not exceed the maximum sentence for the offense for which the YO has been convicted. Successful participation in the YO program by an offender who is sentenced as a YO by the court pursuant to this section, or is classified as such by the Department of Corrections, may result in a recommendation to the court, by the Department of Corrections, for a modification or early termination of probation, community control, or the sentence at any time prior to the scheduled expiration of such term. When a modification of the sentence results in the reduction of a term of incarceration, the court may impose a term of probation or community control which, when added to the term of incarceration, shall not exceed the original sentence imposed.

Consecutive Sentencing

Consecutive YO sentences exceeding the applicable maximum of six years are illegal.[FN3] A sentencing court can impose any YO sentence, so long as no matter how many sentences are imposed, the total does not exceed four years incarceration followed by two years probation or community control allowed by the applicable youthful offender statute.[FN4]

Violation of Probation or Community Control

A violation or alleged violation of probation or the terms of a community control program subjects the youthful offender to the provisions of section 948.06. However, no youthful offender can be committed to the custody of the Department of Corrections for a substantive violation for a period longer than the maximum sentence for the offense for which the youthful offender was found guilty, with credit for time served while incarcerated, or for a technical or nonsubstantive violation for a period longer than six years or for a period longer than the maximum sentence for the offense for which he or she was found guilty, whichever is less, with credit for time served while incarcerated.[FN5] The legislature has not defined “substantive violation” or “technical or nonsubstantive violation,” but courts examining the Youthful Offender Act have defined “substantive violation” as a new separate criminal offense by a youthful offender.[FN6] In contrast, a technical violation is a violation of a rule of probation or community control.[FN7]

Upward Departure

The provisions of the YO Act cannot be used to impose a greater sentence than the permissible sentence range as established by the Criminal Punishment Code pursuant to chapter 921 unless reasons are explained in writing by the trial court judge which reasonably justify departure. A sentence imposed outside of the Criminal Punishment Code is subject to appeal pursuant to section 924.06 or section 924.07, F.S.

Limits on Judicial Discretion

No one who has been found guilty of a life felony can be sentenced as a YO.[FN8] Otherwise, a trial court may exercise discretion and not impose a youthful offender sentence.[FN9] Failure to sentence a defendant as a youthful offender does not result in an illegal sentence.[FN10] A defendant may not be simultaneously sentenced as both a youthful offender and as an adult.[FN11] The sentencing court may not impose a youthful offender sentence on one count, but not another, even if part of a plea agreement.[FN12] As the intent of the Youthful Offender Act was to provide a sentencing alternative more stringent than the juvenile system but less harsh than the adult system, imposition of consecutive sentences as a youthful offender and as an adult would thwart the purpose of the Act.[FN13]

Imposition of sanctions other than those of the Youthful Offender Act is, in fact, prohibited once a court classifies a defendant as a YO. Minimum mandatory sentencing, in fact, is not applicable when a defendant is sentenced as a YO.[FN14] A YO sentence may be imposed on a defendant in lieu of a mandatory sentence under the “10-20-Life” scheme mandated by the firearm enhancement statute, section 775.087, F.S., because the firearm enhancement statute contains no language to supersede a YO sentence.[FN15] Imposition of the statutorily mandated minimum mandatory prison sentence and fine under the drug trafficking statute, section 893.135, F.S., is also preempted by the YO statute.[FN16] A defendant classified as a YO is not subject to the minimum mandatory provisions of the DUI manslaughter statute,[FN17] and the trial court can withhold adjudication for DUI offenses notwithstanding the mandatory language of section 316.656(1), F.S.[FN18] A defendant classified as a YO may, however, also be designated as a sexual offender or sexual predator.[FN19] If designated a sexual offender or sexual predator, the defendant is subject to the mandatory conditions of probation set out in section 948.30, F.S., notwithstanding the defendant’s designation as a YO.[FN20] An otherwise qualified defendant who was originally sentenced as an adult can be sentenced as a YO upon revocation of probation or community control.[FN21]

Mitigation of a Youthful Offender Sentence Through Boot Camp

One of the ways of further mitigating a YO sentence of is through successful completion of a basic training program run by the Department of Corrections. Section 958.04(2)(b), F.S., which governs the disposition of youthful offenders generally, states:

The court may impose a period of incarceration as a condition of probation or community control, which period of incarceration shall be served in either a county facility, a department probation and restitution center, or a community residential facility which is owned and operated by any public or private entity providing such services. . . . Placement in such a facility or center shall not exceed 364 days.​
Section 958.045, F.S., governs the Department of Corrections’s youthful offender basic training program, commonly referred to as “boot camp.” Subsection (5)(c) currently provides in part:

Upon the offender’s completion of the basic training program, the department shall submit a report to the court that describes the offender’s performance. If the offender’s performance has been satisfactory, the court shall issue an order modifying the sentence imposed and placing the offender on probation. . . . If the offender violates the conditions of probation, the court may revoke probation and impose any sentence that it might have originally imposed. [emphasis added]​
Up until section 958.045, F.S. was amended, effective July 1, 2006 to add the language permitting the court to sentence a violator to any sentence it might have originally imposed, when a defendant who had been sentenced as a YO successfully completed boot camp, the trial court was constrained to reduce the defendant’s remaining term of incarceration to a period of probation, and if a YO who has successfully completed boot camp subsequently violated the probation that followed, the trial court could impose a period of incarceration not to exceed 364 days in a specified facility for the violation.[FN22] Any sentence exceeding the 364 days permitted by the statute was illegal.[FN23] The defendant was also entitled to credit against these 364 days for all time previously served on that sentence.[FN24] This is still the rule for all youthful offenders whose offenses were committed prior to July 1, 2006.[FN25]

Presently, for violations of supervision involving offenses committed after July 1, 2006, the sentencing court is not constrained to sentence a youthful offender who has completed a boot camp program to not more than 364 days in the county jail per the Bloodworth decision, and can terminate the defendant’s youthful offender status and sentence the defendant under the Criminal Code for up to the statutory maximum for any offense before the court for sentencing.

The boot camp mitigator does not apply to all YO boot camp programs. Unlike the detailed provisions of the statute pertaining to the Department of Correction’s boot camp programs, section 946.046, F.S., the statute concerning county-run programs merely states:

In counties where there are county-operated youthful offender boot camp programs, other than boot camps described in section 958.04 or sheriff’s training and respect programs in section 985.4891, the court may sentence a youthful offender to such a boot camp. In county-operated youthful offender boot camp programs, juvenile offenders shall not be commingled with youthful offenders.[FN26]​
There are no provisions in the Youthful Offender Act requiring application of rules governing Department of Corrections boot camp facilities to the county-run programs. Moreover, the statute contains no specific provision comparable to section 958.045(5)(c) limiting sentences for youthful offenders who complete a county boot camp. Consequently, the trial court’s sentencing authority in such cases is not limited by section 958.045(5)(c).[FN27]
 
  • #679
Misty's case continued till June 3rd! I don't think that was done by accident. When the others are in federal prison, and Misty is sitting in jail awaiting her turn, it's gonna get exciting. I'm not sure it will take that long! If she can do the math......, she may realize she and Ronald will never be an item again. Once Ronald is sentenced, Misty will be talking a blue streak. I hope she is sweating bullets right now!
 
  • #680
I almost think if there are no arrests in Haleigh's case prior to these hearings, that LE will be happy to take whatever measure of justice they can get. But I am hopeful that we get some arrests SOON. But I am always hoping. :)

And IF that is the case, then I'm not satisfied and I'm quite concerned....JMO
 

Members online

Online statistics

Members online
72
Guests online
2,616
Total visitors
2,688

Forum statistics

Threads
632,701
Messages
18,630,703
Members
243,263
Latest member
timothee.flowers
Back
Top