GrainneDhu
Verified Expert
- Joined
- Jun 11, 2010
- Messages
- 5,159
- Reaction score
- 58
Sorry I am late to this. I always mean to respond quickly but seem to end up distracted and behind. :blushing:
Respectfully, I wonder if we read the same document? I have linked the one I read as it shows that TB did not, in fact, pass her drug tests. Both a hair and urine specimen tested positive for meth.
Nor was her eval considered a "pass'. Due to deception on the part of TB, the CD evaluator was not made aware of the positive meth tests, which negates the accuracy of the evaluation.
IMO, the whole episode from start to finish, smacks of a typical drug user attempting to manipulate the system- and at every turn. I can't think of motive for anyone but an addict to try to fudge UA and/or eval results.
Not one of my bumbling friends/relatives has faced any of the legal issues described in this document, much less the entire list of legal troubles.
Honestly not trying to bash anyone, nor be disagreeable. I just personally find it helpful to be realistic and neither cast people in a too negative or too positive light. jmo
http://www.state.ia.us/dentalboard/Orders/BertchFindingsMay08.pdf
I answered before I re-read the document. You're correct, she didn't pass every drug test.
I stand by my belief, however, that in this particular situation, AuntTB is telling the truth as she sees it. And that her view of the truth appears to be vague, without a tight grasp on the facts or on differentiating what she thinks, what other people think and what is actually known.
She appears to me to be someone who really, really enjoys media attention.